Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $155M | $19.58B | $94M | $3.06T | $4.70T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98M | $127M | $40M | $318.27B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-42M | $-289M | $-3M | $125.22B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 25.8% | 78.3% | 68.3% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -78.0% | -68.3% | -7.9% | 46.8% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.8x | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $120M | $24M | $721K | $112.18B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $87M | $5M | $30.24B | $30.71B |
VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veritone, Inc. (VERI) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 163.1 | +63.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 330.1 | +230.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VERI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BBAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AEYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- Better valuation composite
- 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 0.97 vs MSFT's 1.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs VERI's 3.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.1% vs AEYE's -37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BBAI's -35.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs -19.5% |
VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 2 • VERI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • AEYE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 10482.6x AEYE's $40M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, VERI holds the edge at +32.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98M | $127M | $40M | $318.3B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | -$75M | -$504,000 | $192.6B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$42M | -$289M | -$3M | $125.2B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | -$56M | $2M | $72.9B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +25.8% | +78.3% | +68.3% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -78.0% | -68.3% | -7.9% | +46.8% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.6% | -2.3% | -7.6% | +39.3% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -47.1% | -44.3% | +5.5% | +22.9% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.4% | -0.9% | +7.9% | +18.3% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.8% | +52.0% | +29.0% | +23.4% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.2x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 16% valuation discount to GOOGL's 35.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.20x vs MSFT's 1.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155M | $19.6B | $94M | $3.06T | $4.70T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $258M | $19.5B | $89M | $3.14T | $4.73T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.22x | -5.05x | -30.16x | 30.16x | 35.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 24.76x | 28.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.60x | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 19.29x | 31.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 153.40x | 2.32x | 10.85x | 11.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.16x | 24.28x | 19.49x | 8.94x | 11.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 42.67x | 64.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-3 for VERI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VERI's 8.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs AEYE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -50.7% | -47.8% | +33.1% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.9% | -35.3% | -9.5% | +19.2% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.8% | -19.5% | -42.4% | +24.9% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -54.4% | -19.6% | -17.7% | +29.7% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.91x | 0.04x | 0.15x | 0.33x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $103M | -$63M | -$5M | $81.9B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $87M | $5M | $30.2B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $120M | $24M | $721,000 | $112.2B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.03x | -16.44x | -2.79x | 55.65x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,706 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,113 for VERI. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +137.1% total return vs AEYE's -37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.6% vs VERI's -17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.5% | -29.1% | -24.2% | -12.8% | +23.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.1% | +29.0% | -37.2% | -4.9% | +137.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.0% | +51.1% | +20.1% | +35.5% | +269.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -57.2% | -67.2% | +72.8% | +237.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | -57.9% | +67.6% | +770.8% | +991.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.1% | +14.7% | +6.3% | +10.6% | +54.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSFT and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VERI's 3.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs VERI's 23.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.34x | 3.31x | 2.29x | 0.89x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.42 | $9.39 | $16.39 | $555.45 | $392.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.22 | $2.96 | $5.31 | $356.28 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.1% | +44.1% | +46.0% | +74.1% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 59.4 | 65.8 | 54.0 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 33.8M | 194K | 32.9M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VERI as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 244.0% upside for VERI (target: $8) vs 4.6% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.78% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $6.00 | — | $551.75 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 4 | — | 81 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 19 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.23 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.0% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GOOGL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
VERI vs BBAI vs AEYE vs MSFT vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 2x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Veritone, Inc. (VERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
2x versus Alphabet Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +237. 1%, compared to -88. 9% for Veritone, Inc. (VERI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +991. 5% versus VERI's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Veritone, Inc. 's 3. 34β — meaning VERI is approximately 277% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 9% for Veritone, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veritone, Inc. grew EPS 38. 4% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -95. 2% for VERI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 28. 9x for Alphabet Inc. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VERI: 244. 0% to $7. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. VERI, BBAI, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VERI or BBAI or AEYE or MSFT or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +770. 8% 10Y return). Veritone, Inc. (VERI) carries a higher beta of 3. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +770. 8%, VERI: -83. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VERI and BBAI and AEYE and MSFT and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (VERI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and AEYE (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. MSFT pays a dividend while VERI, BBAI, AEYE, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.