Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRAB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VIA
Via Transportation, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.09B
5Y Perf.-22.2%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$158.17B
5Y Perf.+100.9%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.40B
5Y Perf.-65.8%
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$29M
5Y Perf.-98.7%
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$14.46B
5Y Perf.-71.4%

VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRAB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VIA logoVIA
UBER logoUBER
LYFT logoLYFT
BIRD logoBIRD
GRAB logoGRAB
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationApparel - RetailSoftware - Application
Market Cap$1.09B$158.17B$5.40B$29M$14.46B
Revenue (TTM)$495M$53.69B$6.52B$161M$3.55B
Net Income (TTM)$-76M$8.54B$2.86B$-83M$379M
Gross Margin31.6%41.0%43.2%38.8%43.5%
Operating Margin-11.1%11.7%-2.5%-52.9%5.7%
Forward P/E23.4x23.4x33.7x
Total Debt$29M$13.47B$1.28B$54M$2.05B
Cash & Equiv.$371M$7.74B$1.13B$67M$3.43B

VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRABLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VIA
UBER
LYFT
BIRD
GRAB
StockNov 21May 26Return
Uber Technologies, … (UBER)100200.9+100.9%
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10034.2-65.8%
Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD)1001.3-98.7%
Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB)10028.6-71.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRAB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LYFT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Via Transportation, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. UBER and BIRD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VIA
Via Transportation, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

VIA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 4.98x
  • Beta 1.20, current ratio 4.98x
  • 28.6% revenue growth vs BIRD's -25.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

UBER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.14
  • 83.7% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -69.4%
  • Beta 1.14 vs BIRD's 2.08, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Value Play

LYFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (23.4x vs 33.7x)
  • 43.8% margin vs BIRD's -51.9%
  • 39.1% ROA vs BIRD's -56.3%, ROIC -6.1% vs -61.7%
Best for: value and quality
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BIRD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • -5.3% vs VIA's -71.5%
Best for: momentum
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited
The Growth Play

GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVIA logoVIA28.6% revenue growth vs BIRD's -25.3%
ValueLYFT logoLYFTLower P/E (23.4x vs 33.7x)
Quality / MarginsLYFT logoLYFT43.8% margin vs BIRD's -51.9%
Stability / SafetyUBER logoUBERBeta 1.14 vs BIRD's 2.08, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BIRD logoBIRD-5.3% vs VIA's -71.5%
Efficiency (ROA)LYFT logoLYFT39.1% ROA vs BIRD's -56.3%, ROIC -6.1% vs -61.7%

VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VIAVia Transportation, Inc.
FY 2025
Retail
100.0%$467M
Product and Service, Other
0.0%$46,000
UBERUber Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobility
57.0%$29.7B
Delivery
33.2%$17.2B
Freight
9.8%$5.1B
LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BIRDAllbirds, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$190M
GRABGrab Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Deliveries
53.5%$1.8B
Mobility
36.2%$1.2B
Financial Services
10.3%$347M

VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRAB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUBERLAGGINGGRAB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — UBER and GRAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 334.2x BIRD's $161M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIRD's -51.9%. On growth, VIA holds the edge at +54.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVIA logoVIAVia Transportatio…UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$495M$53.7B$6.5B$161M$3.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$43M$7.0B-$63M-$77M$395M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$76M$8.5B$2.9B-$83M$379M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$518,000$9.8B$1.2B-$66M-$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.6%+41.0%+43.2%+38.8%+43.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-11.1%+11.7%-2.5%-52.9%+5.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-15.3%+15.9%+43.8%-51.9%+10.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.1%+18.3%+17.7%-41.0%-2.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.6%+14.5%+13.8%-23.3%+23.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+99.3%-84.3%+7.1%+2.1%
Evenly matched — UBER and GRAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LYFT and BIRD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 96% valuation discount to GRAB's 57.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 26.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRAB's 34.5x.

MetricVIA logoVIAVia Transportatio…UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$158.2B$5.4B$29M$14.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$750M$163.9B$5.5B$16M$13.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-11.77x16.14x2.04x-0.43x57.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.41x23.38x33.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.97x34.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.52x3.04x0.85x0.15x4.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.81x5.76x1.77x0.40x2.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.20x4.84x107.92x
Evenly matched — LYFT and BIRD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-112 for VIA. VIA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIRD's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVIA logoVIAVia Transportatio…UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-111.5%+32.0%+150.2%-108.4%+5.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.1%+14.2%+39.1%-56.3%+3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-23.1%+13.6%-6.1%-61.7%+3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.1%+12.5%-6.2%-45.9%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957454
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.48x0.39x0.53x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$342M$5.7B$145M-$13M-$1.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$371M$7.7B$1.1B$67M$3.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$29M$13.5B$1.3B$54M$2.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-30.45x11.51x-5.32x-224.86x2.96x
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $17,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $89 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, BIRD leads with a -5.3% total return vs VIA's -71.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 25.7% vs BIRD's -41.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVIA logoVIAVia Transportatio…UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-48.0%-7.8%-29.9%+24.8%-28.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-71.5%-13.3%-19.3%-5.3%-27.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.5%+98.6%+69.5%-79.8%+14.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.5%+74.3%-70.4%-99.1%-68.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.5%+83.7%-82.3%-99.1%-69.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-34.2%+25.7%+19.2%-41.3%+4.7%
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 74.9% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 21.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVIA logoVIAVia Transportatio…UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.20x1.14x1.31x2.08x1.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$56.31$101.99$25.54$24.31$6.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.11$68.46$12.46$2.15$3.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+25.1%+74.9%+54.3%+21.1%+55.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.953.246.546.240.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded758K15.6M15.4M7.2M49.1M
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VIA as "Buy", UBER as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold", GRAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.8% upside for VIA (target: $37) vs 32.8% for LYFT (target: $18).

MetricVIA logoVIAVia Transportatio…UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.25$103.30$18.43$6.23
# AnalystsCovering analysts5615912
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.1%+9.3%0.0%+1.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallUber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VIA vs UBER vs LYFT vs BIRD vs GRAB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Via Transportation, Inc.

(VIA) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 3% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E (23. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Via Transportation, Inc. (VIA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 57. 1x. On forward P/E, Lyft, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB?

Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) delivered a total return of +74. 3%, compared to -99. 1% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +83. 7% versus BIRD's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning BIRD is approximately 81% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Via Transportation, Inc. (VIA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 53% for Allbirds, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Via Transportation, Inc.

(VIA) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus -25. 3% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 2% for Via Transportation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRAB leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -49. 2% for Allbirds, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -51. 4% for BIRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) trades at 23. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Grab Holdings Limited — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIA: 163. 8% to $37. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is VIA or UBER or LYFT or BIRD or GRAB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14)). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +83. 7%, BIRD: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VIA and UBER and LYFT and BIRD and GRAB?

These companies operate in different sectors (VIA (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and LYFT (Technology) and BIRD (Consumer Cyclical) and GRAB (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VIA is a small-cap high-growth stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VIA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UBER

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LYFT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BIRD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GRAB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VIA and UBER and LYFT and BIRD and GRAB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VIA: 54.6% · UBER: 14.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.