Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1.49B | $1.10B | $73.68B | $24.95B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65M | $361M | $14.92B | $3.17B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-443M | $-24M | $4.42B | $1.29B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 279.6% | 79.3% | 84.5% | 86.6% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.0% | 4.1% | 24.3% | 45.3% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 217.8x | 15.3x | 19.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $187M | $473M | $2.71B | $0.00 | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $75M | $3.12B | $1.56B | $1.98B |
VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vir Biotechnology, … (VIR) | 100 | 27.1 | -72.9% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
| United Therapeutics… (UTHR) | 100 | 482.6 | +382.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, VIR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MNKD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 22.2% revenue growth vs VIR's -7.6%
REGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.0%
- 410.0% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- 40.6% margin vs VIR's -6.8%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs REGN's 2.43
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 19.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.01
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs VIR's -7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 19.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.6% margin vs VIR's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs VIR's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.4% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.2% ROA vs VIR's -41.8%, ROIC 21.1% vs -40.3% |
VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UTHR leads in 4 of 6 categories
IQV leads 2 • VIR leads 0 • MNKD leads 0 • REGN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 253.9x VIR's $65M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIR's -6.8%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65M | $361M | $14.9B | $3.2B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$452M | $25M | $4.2B | $1.6B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$443M | -$24M | $4.4B | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$444M | $13M | $4.2B | $1.0B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +79.3% | +84.5% | +86.6% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +4.1% | +24.3% | +45.3% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | -6.6% | +29.6% | +40.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +3.6% | +27.9% | +32.1% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.0% | +15.1% | +19.0% | -1.6% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -2.2% | -7.2% | -12.2% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 90% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs REGN's 2.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.1B | $73.7B | $24.9B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $1.5B | $73.3B | $23.4B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.93x | 177.50x | 17.09x | 20.43x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 217.79x | 15.35x | 19.38x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | 1.06x | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.26x | 17.78x | 14.82x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.80x | 3.14x | 5.14x | 7.84x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | — | 2.46x | 3.84x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 80.08x | 18.06x | 23.97x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UTHR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-53 for VIR. REGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UTHR scores 7/9 vs VIR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.3% | — | +14.3% | +19.2% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.8% | -3.9% | +11.1% | +17.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.3% | +21.6% | +8.9% | +21.1% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.8% | +8.3% | +10.2% | +21.4% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | — | 0.09x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$47M | $399M | -$412M | -$1.6B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $75M | $3.1B | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $187M | $473M | $2.7B | $0 | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | 108.44x | 125.37x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UTHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UTHR five years ago would be worth $29,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,157 for VIR. Over the past 12 months, UTHR leads with a +85.4% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UTHR at 39.3% vs VIR's -27.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.1% | -36.6% | -8.5% | +14.6% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.2% | -26.8% | +27.1% | +85.4% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.6% | -8.5% | -5.1% | +170.4% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -17.2% | +43.6% | +191.3% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.9% | -46.2% | +90.0% | +410.0% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.3% | -2.9% | -1.7% | +39.3% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
UTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UTHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VIR's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTHR currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs MNKD's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 0.90x | 0.81x | 0.19x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.66 | $6.51 | $821.11 | $609.35 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.16 | $2.23 | $476.49 | $272.12 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.5% | +54.5% | +86.4% | +93.4% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 74.3 | 44.9 | 65.0 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 6.4M | 631K | 516K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VIR as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 129.7% upside for VIR (target: $21) vs 7.3% for UTHR (target: $611). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.29 | $7.00 | $865.68 | $610.67 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 19 | 48 | 30 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +4.0% | +4.1% |
UTHR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
VIR vs MNKD vs REGN vs UTHR vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 6% for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) delivered a total return of +191.
3%, compared to -78. 4% for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UTHR returned +410. 0% versus MNKD's -46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Vir Biotechnology, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning VIR is approximately 972% more volatile than UTHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.
2% versus -7. 6% for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vir Biotechnology, Inc. grew EPS 17. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV?
United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
9% net margin versus -638. 9% for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTHR leads at 46. 9% versus -682. 7% for VIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UTHR leads at 87. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 203. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIR: 129. 7% to $21. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. VIR, MNKD, UTHR, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VIR or MNKD or REGN or UTHR or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), +410. 0% 10Y return). Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +410. 0%, VIR: -33. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIR and MNKD and REGN and UTHR and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VIR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.