Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $7.44B | $2.35B | $2.64B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.49B | $867M | $1.12B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $598M | $169M | $224M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | 72.1% | 71.0% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | 25.3% | 25.5% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 10.8x | 11.5x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.43B | $327M | $1.12B | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $315M | $185M | $668M | $52M |
VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valley National Ban… (VLY) | 100 | 167.9 | +67.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 3.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
- +59.4% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.42 vs VLY's 6.26
- NIM 3.4% vs VLY's 2.7%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs VLY's -2.2%
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs VLY's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs VLY's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.4% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
VLY leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and IBCP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 11.1x IBCP's $315M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.7% (IBCP) to 17.1% (VLY).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $867M | $1.1B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $796M | $241M | $323M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $598M | $169M | $224M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $329M | $225M | $230M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.9% | +72.1% | +71.0% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +25.3% | +25.5% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +19.5% | +20.0% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +25.2% | +20.7% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.0% | +39.5% | +5.4% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 23% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs VLY's 7.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.6B | $2.5B | $3.1B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.27x | 13.53x | 12.13x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.41x | 10.80x | 11.50x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.97x | 1.92x | 1.50x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.19x | 10.35x | 9.49x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 2.71x | 2.36x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.21x | 1.28x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.65x | 10.75x | 11.39x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for VLY. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs VLY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +9.5% | +10.8% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.17x | 0.53x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $142M | $448M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $315M | $185M | $668M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $327M | $1.1B | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 1.05x | 0.75x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,759 for VLY. Over the past 12 months, VLY leads with a +59.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | +9.3% | +15.5% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.4% | +9.0% | +32.5% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.7% | +54.1% | +118.5% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.6% | +29.9% | +47.6% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +102.2% | +127.7% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.0% | +15.5% | +29.8% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VLY's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.89x | 0.94x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.12 | $46.92 | $45.99 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.36 | $39.20 | $33.39 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +96.1% | +97.6% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 57.3 | 56.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.1M | 236K | 392K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VLY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VLY as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.3% upside for VLY (target: $16) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, VLY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.29% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.58 | $46.00 | $45.50 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $1.43 | $0.97 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
VLY vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Valley National Bancorp (VLY). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Valley National Bancorp (VLY) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Valley National Bancorp's 6. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to +7. 6% for Valley National Bancorp (VLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus VLY's +97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Valley National Bancorp's 1. 24β — meaning VLY is approximately 51% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -2. 2% for Valley National Bancorp (VLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Valley National Bancorp grew EPS 46. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 17. 1% for Valley National Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus 21. 3% for VLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Valley National Bancorp's 6. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VLY: 16. 3% to $15. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Valley National Bancorp (VLY) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is VLY or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, VLY: +97. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VLY and NBTB and TRMK and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.