VMAR vs TSLA vs ENPH vs CHPT

For growth investors, Vision Marine Technologies Inc.

(VMAR) is the stronger pick with 404. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) a "Hold" — based on 81 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc.

(ENPH) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus Tesla, Inc. at 381. 3x. On forward P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enphase Energy, Inc. wins at 2. 79x versus Tesla, Inc. 's 5. 50x.

Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.

(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Vision Marine Technologies Inc. (VMAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus VMAR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vision Marine Technologies Inc.

(VMAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 61β — meaning CHPT is approximately 91% more volatile than VMAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vision Marine Technologies Inc.

(VMAR) is pulling ahead at 404. 9% versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enphase Energy, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46885. 3% for Vision Marine Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VMAR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Enphase Energy, Inc.

(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -156. 5% for Vision Marine Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -74. 6% for VMAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 79x versus Tesla, Inc. 's 5. 50x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 213. 0x for Tesla, Inc. — 195. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 22. 6% to $43. 48.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.

(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1738% 10Y return). ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1738%, CHPT: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (VMAR (Consumer Cyclical) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and ENPH (Energy) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VMAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.