REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Office
VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $5.94B | $66.84B | $5.78B | $3.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $6.36B | $1.02B | $981M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $795M | $4.61B | $-197M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 73.2% | 85.7% | 38.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 49.9% | 16.5% | 42.7% |
| Forward P/E | 371.3x | 30.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $7.89B | $29.94B | $5.20B | $7.91B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $841M | $823M | $43M | $336M |
VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 356.2 | +256.2% |
| The Macerich Company (MAC) | 100 | 326.4 | +226.4% |
| SL Green Realty Cor… (SLG) | 100 | 100.1 | +0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VNO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, current ratio 1.80x
- Beta 1.19, yield 2.3%, current ratio 1.80x
SPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 32.3% 10Y total return vs SLG's -26.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 72.5% margin vs MAC's -19.4%
MAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +54.5% vs VNO's -15.8%
SLG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs VNO's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs VNO's 1.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs MAC's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs MAC's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs VNO's -15.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs MAC's -2.3%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.6% |
VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories
MAC leads 1 • VNO leads 0 • SLG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 6.5x SLG's $981M. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAC's -19.4%. On growth, SLG holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $6.4B | $1.0B | $981M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $719M | $4.7B | $533M | $678M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $795M | $4.6B | -$197M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $2.3B | $348M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.2% | +85.7% | +38.2% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +49.9% | +16.5% | +42.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.0% | +72.5% | -19.4% | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +35.4% | +34.2% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +13.2% | -3.9% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.9% | +3.6% | +92.1% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VNO and SLG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 48% valuation discount to SPG's 14.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VNO's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLG's 26.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $66.8B | $5.8B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.0B | $96.0B | $10.9B | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.51x | 14.53x | -28.87x | -28.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 371.29x | 30.90x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.22x | 20.60x | 20.52x | 26.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 10.50x | 5.70x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 9.99x | 2.26x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.72x | — | 17.98x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $-7 for MAC. VNO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs SLG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +68.8% | -7.5% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +11.4% | -2.3% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +7.6% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +9.1% | +2.2% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 4.47x | 2.06x | 1.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.0B | $29.1B | $5.2B | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $841M | $823M | $43M | $336M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $29.9B | $5.2B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.63x | 3.26x | 0.18x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPG five years ago would be worth $19,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,992 for VNO. Over the past 12 months, MAC leads with a +54.5% total return vs VNO's -15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAC at 35.0% vs SPG's 28.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | +12.9% | +21.0% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | +33.7% | +54.5% | -13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +113.0% | +145.9% | +142.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | +97.9% | +89.4% | -15.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.7% | +32.3% | -53.8% | -26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.2% | +28.7% | +35.0% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SPG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAC's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPG currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs SLG's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.61x | 1.29x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.37 | $208.28 | $22.55 | $66.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.57 | $155.44 | $14.62 | $34.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.8% | +98.7% | +98.6% | +66.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 56.3 | 58.0 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.4M | 2.0M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VNO and SPG and MAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VNO as "Hold", SPG as "Hold", MAC as "Hold", SLG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for VNO (target: $38) vs -4.1% for SPG (target: $197). For income investors, MAC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.05% vs VNO's 2.33%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.50 | $197.00 | $21.40 | $50.46 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 37 | 34 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | — | $0.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VNO vs SPG vs MAC vs SLG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (371. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
5x versus Simon Property Group, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG?
Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) delivered a total return of +97. 9%, compared to -20. 1% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPG returned +32. 3% versus MAC's -53. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus The Macerich Company's 1. 29β — meaning MAC is approximately 113% more volatile than SPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 116% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus 1. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPG leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus -19. 4% for The Macerich Company — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 15. 0% for VNO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) trades at 30. 9x forward P/E versus 371. 3x for Vornado Realty Trust — 340. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNO: 18. 8% to $37. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG?
In this comparison, MAC (3.
0% yield), VNO (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SPG, SLG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VNO or SPG or MAC or SLG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPG: +32. 3%, SLG: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VNO and SPG and MAC and SLG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MAC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock. VNO, MAC pay a dividend while SPG, SLG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.