Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VNRX
VolitionRx Limited

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$13M
5Y Perf.-96.3%
GH
Guardant Health, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.10B
5Y Perf.+5.9%
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.02B
5Y Perf.+20.4%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.07B
5Y Perf.-59.8%

VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VNRX logoVNRX
GH logoGH
EXAS logoEXAS
ILMN logoILMN
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$13M$12.10B$20.02B$21.07B
Revenue (TTM)$2M$1.08B$3.25B$4.39B
Net Income (TTM)$-23M$-433M$-208M$853M
Gross Margin100.0%64.9%69.7%67.1%
Operating Margin-12.5%-41.4%-6.4%20.9%
Forward P/E582.8x27.2x
Total Debt$11M$1.68B$2.52B$2.55B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$378M$956M$1.42B

VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VNRX
GH
EXAS
ILMN
StockMay 20May 26Return
VolitionRx Limited (VNRX)1003.7-96.3%
Guardant Health, In… (GH)100105.9+5.9%
Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS)100120.4+20.4%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10040.2-59.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. VolitionRx Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. GH and EXAS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VNRX
VolitionRx Limited
The Growth Play

VNRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 78.0%
  • 40.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
Best for: growth exposure
GH
Guardant Health, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

GH is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +132.2% vs VNRX's -76.7%
Best for: momentum
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation
The Income Pick

EXAS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.12
  • 16.7% 10Y total return vs GH's 186.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, current ratio 2.43x
  • Beta 0.12, current ratio 2.43x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Value Play

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (27.2x vs 582.8x)
  • 19.4% margin vs VNRX's -13.5%
  • 13.4% ROA vs VNRX's -305.6%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVNRX logoVNRX40.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
ValueILMN logoILMNLower P/E (27.2x vs 582.8x)
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs VNRX's -13.5%
Stability / SafetyEXAS logoEXASBeta 0.12 vs ILMN's 1.23
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GH logoGH+132.2% vs VNRX's -76.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs VNRX's -305.6%

VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VNRXVolitionRx Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

GHGuardant Health, Inc.
FY 2025
Oncology
69.6%$684M
Biopharma & Data
21.4%$210M
Screening
8.1%$80M
Licensing & Other
0.9%$9M
EXASExact Sciences Corporation
FY 2025
Screening
77.9%$2.5B
Precision Oncology
22.1%$717M
ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M

VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGVNRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 2542.0x VNRX's $2M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNRX's -13.5%. On growth, VNRX holds the edge at +133.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVNRX logoVNRXVolitionRx LimitedGH logoGHGuardant Health, …EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2M$1.1B$3.2B$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M-$418M-$41M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$23M-$433M-$208M$853M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M-$225M$357M$989M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+64.9%+69.7%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.5%-41.4%-6.4%+20.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.5%-40.1%-6.4%+19.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.4%-20.8%+11.0%+22.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+133.2%+48.3%+23.1%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.5%-10.4%+90.4%+6.1%
ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricVNRX logoVNRXVolitionRx LimitedGH logoGHGuardant Health, …EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$13M$12.1B$20.0B$21.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$23M$13.4B$21.6B$22.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.55x-27.79x-95.37x25.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.582.83x27.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.49x12.32x6.16x4.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.24x7.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF56.10x22.63x
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-9 for EXAS. ILMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.94x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs VNRX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVNRX logoVNRXVolitionRx LimitedGH logoGHGuardant Health, …EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.7%+32.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.1%-26.5%-3.5%+13.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-34.9%-3.6%+16.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-29.4%-4.0%+17.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92578
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.05x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10M$1.3B$1.6B$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$378M$956M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$1.7B$2.5B$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-8.44x-181.67x-5.47x12.09x
ILMN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EXAS five years ago would be worth $10,039 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $388 for VNRX. Over the past 12 months, GH leads with a +132.2% total return vs VNRX's -76.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GH at 57.7% vs VNRX's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVNRX logoVNRXVolitionRx LimitedGH logoGHGuardant Health, …EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.7%-9.3%+3.1%+3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-76.7%+132.2%+96.9%+81.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.0%+292.1%+53.0%-27.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.1%-31.9%+0.4%-62.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+186.5%+1669.1%+0.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-60.7%+57.7%+15.2%-10.0%
GH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILMN's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs VNRX's 12.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVNRX logoVNRXVolitionRx LimitedGH logoGHGuardant Health, …EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.28x0.86x0.05x1.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.80$120.74$104.98$155.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.27$36.36$38.81$73.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+12.9%+76.4%+99.9%+89.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10031.655.976.465.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded714K1.9M4.2M1.5M
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GH as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for GH (target: $133) vs 0.1% for EXAS (target: $105).

MetricVNRX logoVNRXVolitionRx LimitedGH logoGHGuardant Health, …EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$133.14$105.00$147.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts304150
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.1%+3.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GH leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VNRX vs GH vs EXAS vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) is the stronger pick with 40.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN?

On forward P/E, Illumina, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 27. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN?

Over the past 5 years, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) delivered a total return of +0.

4%, compared to -96. 1% for VolitionRx Limited (VNRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXAS returned +1669% versus VNRX's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

05β versus Illumina, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning ILMN is approximately 2189% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 94% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) is pulling ahead at 40.

0% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to 6. 7% for Guardant Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNRX leads at 78. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -1352. 2% for VolitionRx Limited — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -1228. 6% for VNRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 582. 8x for Exact Sciences Corporation — 555. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GH: 44. 3% to $133. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is VNRX or GH or EXAS or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

05), +1669% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, ILMN: +3. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VNRX and GH and EXAS and ILMN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VNRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; GH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VNRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 66%
  • Gross Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GH

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VNRX and GH and EXAS and ILMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VNRX: 133.2% · GH: 48.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.