Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $3.80B | $3.60B | $2.82B | $6.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.39B | $5.27B | $5.50B | $6.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $507M | $192M | $465M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 58.6% | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 13.4% | 6.0% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 8.0x | 12.1x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.70B | $1.17B | $1.73B | $1.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $760M | $239M | $369M |
VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria's Secret &… (VSCO) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 207.6 | +107.6% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 48.3 | -51.7% |
| Urban Outfitters, I… (URBN) | 100 | 189.5 | +89.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +147.1% vs ANF's +12.7%
ANF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 219.7% 10Y total return vs URBN's 143.2%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 13.4x)
- 9.6% margin vs VSCO's 2.7%
- 15.1% ROA vs VSCO's 3.6%, ROIC 31.4% vs 7.7%
AEO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.08
URBN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 43.5%, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 1.35, current ratio 1.51x
- 11.1% revenue growth vs VSCO's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs VSCO's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs VSCO's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs VSCO's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +147.1% vs ANF's +12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs VSCO's 3.6%, ROIC 31.4% vs 7.7% |
VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANF leads in 4 of 6 categories
URBN leads 1 • AEO leads 1 • VSCO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSCO and ANF operate at a comparable scale, with $6.4B and $5.3B in trailing revenue. ANF is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSCO's 2.7%. On growth, URBN holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $5.3B | $5.5B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $561M | $862M | $546M | $614M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $507M | $192M | $465M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $309M | $378M | $25M | $445M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +58.6% | +33.0% | +36.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +13.4% | +6.0% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +9.6% | +3.5% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +7.2% | +0.5% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +5.4% | +9.7% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.2% | +3.1% | -7.4% | -18.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 68% valuation discount to VSCO's 23.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VSCO's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $3.6B | $2.8B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.31x | 7.51x | 15.27x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.37x | 7.98x | 12.06x | 13.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.09x | 4.68x | 7.99x | 9.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.68x | 0.51x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 2.68x | 1.73x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.40x | 9.52x | — | 14.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $12 for AEO. URBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSCO's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), URBN scores 8/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.9% | +38.5% | +12.1% | +16.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +15.1% | +4.8% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +31.4% | +8.1% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +30.5% | +10.7% | +16.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.06x | 0.82x | 1.02x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $409M | $1.5B | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $760M | $239M | $369M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.24x | 302.38x | 75.18x | 2531.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,188 for AEO. Over the past 12 months, VSCO leads with a +147.1% total return vs ANF's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.9% vs AEO's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.9% | -36.6% | -35.9% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.1% | +12.7% | +53.4% | +36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.4% | +237.1% | +34.4% | +149.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +92.7% | -48.1% | +78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +219.7% | +45.6% | +143.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.0% | +49.9% | +10.4% | +35.6% |
Risk & Volatility
URBN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
URBN is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSCO's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URBN currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs AEO's 58.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.23x | 1.42x | 2.08x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.89 | $133.11 | $28.46 | $84.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.53 | $65.45 | $9.27 | $51.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.1% | +59.0% | +58.5% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 33.0 | 40.8 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 1.2M | 5.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AEO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VSCO as "Buy", ANF as "Hold", AEO as "Hold", URBN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.9% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs 17.1% for VSCO (target: $56).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.67 | $120.80 | $24.83 | $89.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 55 | 52 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +12.5% | 0.0% | +5.5% |
ANF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). URBN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
VSCO vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Victoria's Secret & Co. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +92. 7%, compared to -48. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANF returned +219. 7% versus VSCO's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Victoria's Secret & Co. 's 2. 23β — meaning VSCO is approximately 65% more volatile than URBN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 4% for Victoria's Secret & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus 0. 8% for Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Victoria's Secret & Co. grew EPS 46. 8% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN?
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus 2. 6% for Victoria's Secret & Co. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANF leads at 13. 3% versus 5. 0% for VSCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Victoria's Secret & Co. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 53. 9% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VSCO or ANF or AEO or URBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+143. 2% 10Y return). Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URBN: +143. 2%, VSCO: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSCO and ANF and AEO and URBN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VSCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; URBN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.