Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Communication Equipment
Broadcasting
Telecommunications Services
VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Communication Equipment | Broadcasting | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $5.89B | $1.38B | $412M | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $5.11B | $636M | $3.08B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $165M | $50M | $-76M | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 32.3% | 55.7% | 115.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -60.2% | 17.8% | 12.1% | 12.4% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.9x | 21.8x | 1.8x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $6.86B | $148M | $5.81B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $775K | $280M | $101M | $368M | $9.48B |
VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VS Media Holdings L… (VSME) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Nexstar Media Group… (NXST) | 100 | 135.5 | +35.5% |
| Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 64.0 | -36.0% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 80.3%
- +39.8% vs CMCSA's -19.9%
NXST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 331.4% 10Y total return vs HLIT's 269.9%
HLIT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 2.18x
- 11.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
GTN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 7.4x)
- 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- 14.8% margin vs VSME's -70.1%
- Beta 0.21 vs VSME's 2.67, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 7.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs VSME's -70.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs VSME's 2.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs CMCSA's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs VSME's -20.6%, ROIC 8.2% vs -104.0% |
VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GTN leads in 1 of 6 categories
HLIT leads 1 • NXST leads 1 • VSME leads 0 • CMCSA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXST and GTN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 59453.5x VSME's $2M. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSME's -70.1%. On growth, NXST holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $5.1B | $636M | $3.1B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $2.0B | $88M | $932M | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $165M | $50M | -$76M | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$192,882 | $708M | $133M | -$74M | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +32.3% | +55.7% | +115.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.2% | +17.8% | +12.1% | +12.4% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -70.1% | +3.2% | +7.8% | -2.5% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | +13.8% | +21.0% | -2.4% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.1% | -27.3% | -1.8% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +51.0% | -87.5% | +98.5% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 92% valuation discount to NXST's 64.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMCSA's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HLIT's 18.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $5.9B | $1.4B | $412M | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $12.5B | $1.4B | $5.9B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.72x | 64.75x | 37.21x | -5.03x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.88x | 21.80x | 1.81x | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.57x | 18.93x | 9.31x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 1.19x | 2.03x | 0.13x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 2.89x | 3.10x | 0.15x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.93x | 26.13x | 2.27x | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-115 for VSME. HLIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXST's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIT scores 7/9 vs VSME's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -115.5% | +10.0% | +11.2% | -2.9% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | +1.9% | +6.5% | -0.7% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.0% | +7.4% | +9.3% | +3.5% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +8.2% | +11.2% | +3.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 3.33x | 0.32x | 2.07x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $6.6B | $47M | $5.4B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $775,246 | $280M | $101M | $368M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $6.9B | $148M | $5.8B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.22x | 1.81x | 12.92x | 1.12x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NXST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HLIT five years ago would be worth $16,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $265 for VSME. Over the past 12 months, VSME leads with a +39.8% total return vs CMCSA's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NXST at 8.9% vs VSME's -70.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +874.6% | -6.1% | +22.6% | -6.0% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +29.4% | +38.1% | +27.7% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +29.1% | -8.9% | -26.1% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +50.1% | +69.4% | -72.7% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +331.4% | +269.9% | -50.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.2% | +8.9% | -3.1% | -9.6% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HLIT and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSME's 2.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLIT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs VSME's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.67x | 0.73x | 1.51x | 1.54x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.21 | $254.30 | $12.38 | $6.43 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.07 | $154.64 | $7.80 | $3.50 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +76.4% | +99.2% | +68.9% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 43.2 | 76.9 | 52.8 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 757K | 402K | 1.1M | 1.3M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GTN and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXST as "Buy", HLIT as "Hold", GTN as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.6% upside for GTN (target: $8) vs 1.8% for HLIT (target: $13). For income investors, GTN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.68% vs NXST's 2.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $250.00 | $12.50 | $8.00 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 19 | 9 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | — | +7.7% | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 3 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.50 | — | $0.34 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +7.5% |
GTN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HLIT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
VSME vs NXST vs HLIT vs GTN vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Nexstar Media Group, Inc. at 64. 8x. On forward P/E, Gray Media, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) delivered a total return of +69. 4%, compared to -97. 4% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (VSME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +331. 4% versus VSME's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 67β — meaning VSME is approximately 1176% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 3% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to -126. 2% for Gray Media, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSME leads at 80. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus -88. 4% for VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXST leads at 17. 4% versus -83. 7% for VSME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Harmonic Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTN: 80. 6% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA?
In this comparison, GTN (7.
7% yield), CMCSA (5. 1% yield), NXST (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. VSME, HLIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VSME or NXST or HLIT or GTN or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). VS Media Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (VSME) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, VSME: -97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSME and NXST and HLIT and GTN and CMCSA?
These companies operate in different sectors (VSME (Communication Services) and NXST (Communication Services) and HLIT (Technology) and GTN (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VSME is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NXST, GTN, CMCSA pay a dividend while VSME, HLIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 68%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.