VSTS
Vestis Corporation
Rental & Leasing Services
Market Cap$1.22B
5Y Perf.-52.1%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$355M
5Y Perf.-45.7%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$67.28B
5Y Perf.+38.9%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-59.3%
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$2.73B
5Y Perf.-63.1%
VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VSTS | KELYA | CTAS | MAN | RHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Specialty Business Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $355M | $67.28B | $1.38B | $2.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.71B | $3.09B | $10.79B | $17.96B | $5.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-47M | $-266M | $1.90B | $-13M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | 26.3% | 50.2% | 16.7% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | -2.8% | 23.0% | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 11.2x | 34.1x | 8.1x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $159M | $2.65B | $2.39B | $421M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $33M | $264M | $871M | $464M |
VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VSTS
KELYA
CTAS
MAN
RHI
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vestis Corporation (VSTS) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
| Cintas Corporation (CTAS) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Robert Half Interna… (RHI) | 100 | 36.9 | -63.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CTAS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Vestis Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. MAN and RHI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VSTS
Vestis Corporation
The Momentum Pick
VSTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +47.4% vs RHI's -35.2%
Best for: momentum
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: industrials exposure
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
The Growth Play
CTAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 16.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs RHI's 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.09x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Value Play
MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 20.5x)
Best for: value
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.
The Income Pick
RHI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 8.8%
- 8.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CTAS | 7.7% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2% |
| Value | MAN | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 20.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTAS | 17.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CTAS | Beta 0.51 vs VSTS's 1.35, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RHI | 8.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VSTS | +47.4% vs RHI's -35.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTAS | 18.7% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 25.8% vs -4.0% |
VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTASLAGGINGKELYA
Who Leads Where
CTAS leads in 3 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • RHI leads 1 • VSTS leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
0leads
VSTSVestis Corporation
0leads
RHIRobert Half Internati…
1leads
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
1leads
CTASCintas Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MANvs RHIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CTAS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MAN4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTAS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CTAS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
RHI2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 6.6x VSTS's $2.7B. CTAS is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, CTAS holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VSTSVestis Corporation | KELYAKelly Services, I… | CTASCintas Corporation | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $3.1B | $10.8B | $18.0B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $203M | -$54M | $2.9B | $236M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$47M | -$266M | $1.9B | -$13M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $88M | $66M | $1.8B | -$161M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +26.3% | +50.2% | +16.7% | +36.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -2.8% | +23.0% | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -8.6% | +17.6% | -0.1% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +2.1% | +16.5% | -0.9% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -100.0% | +9.3% | +7.1% | -5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.1% | +11.0% | +36.2% | -39.6% |
CTAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.3x trailing earnings, RHI trades at a 46% valuation discount to CTAS's 37.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CTAS's 24.4x.
| Metric | VSTSVestis Corporation | KELYAKelly Services, I… | CTASCintas Corporation | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $355M | $67.3B | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $481M | $69.7B | $2.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.81x | -1.36x | 37.95x | -102.90x | 20.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.12x | 11.15x | 34.12x | 8.12x | 20.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.27x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.53x | — | 24.41x | 8.94x | 21.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 0.08x | 6.51x | 0.08x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 0.35x | 14.62x | 0.67x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 211.38x | 3.11x | 38.29x | — | 10.25x |
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTAS delivers a 42.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSTS's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTAS scores 9/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | VSTSVestis Corporation | KELYAKelly Services, I… | CTASCintas Corporation | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | -24.6% | +42.6% | -0.6% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -11.3% | +18.7% | -0.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | -4.0% | +25.8% | +5.6% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | -4.3% | +29.8% | +6.2% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.64x | 0.16x | 0.57x | 1.16x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $126M | $2.4B | $1.5B | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $33M | $264M | $871M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $159M | $2.7B | $2.4B | $421M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | -12.07x | 24.61x | 1.98x | — |
CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTAS five years ago would be worth $19,239 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,449 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, VSTS leads with a +47.4% total return vs RHI's -35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTAS at 14.2% vs VSTS's -21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VSTSVestis Corporation | KELYAKelly Services, I… | CTASCintas Corporation | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.4% | +15.1% | -9.4% | -0.7% | +1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.4% | -18.8% | -21.5% | -24.5% | -35.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | -33.1% | +49.1% | -47.2% | -50.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | -57.3% | +92.4% | -65.5% | -59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | -32.0% | +671.6% | -31.5% | +9.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.1% | -12.6% | +14.2% | -19.2% | -20.7% |
CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VSTS and CTAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSTS's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VSTS currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs RHI's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VSTSVestis Corporation | KELYAKelly Services, I… | CTASCintas Corporation | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.96x | 0.51x | 0.89x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.38 | $14.94 | $229.24 | $47.34 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.98 | $7.98 | $165.46 | $25.15 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +66.1% | +72.8% | +63.0% | +55.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 59.6 | 39.5 | 53.7 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 364K | 2.1M | 1.1M | 2.9M |
Evenly matched — VSTS and CTAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VSTS as "Sell", KELYA as "Buy", CTAS as "Hold", MAN as "Hold", RHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -36.1% for VSTS (target: $6). For income investors, RHI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.79% vs CTAS's 0.89%.
| Metric | VSTSVestis Corporation | KELYAKelly Services, I… | CTASCintas Corporation | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.90 | $15.00 | $223.40 | $37.86 | $40.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 5 | 30 | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.2% | +0.9% | +4.8% | +8.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $0.31 | $1.49 | $1.43 | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +1.4% | +2.8% | +3.4% |
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CTAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCintas Corporation (CTAS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VSTS vs KELYA vs CTAS vs MAN vs RHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the better valuation at 20. 3x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI?
On trailing P/E, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the cheapest at 20. 3x versus Cintas Corporation at 37. 9x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI?
Over the past 5 years, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) delivered a total return of +92.
4%, compared to -65. 5% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTAS returned +671. 6% versus VSTS's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Vestis Corporation's 1. 35β — meaning VSTS is approximately 165% more volatile than CTAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 164% for Vestis Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cintas Corporation grew EPS 16. 1% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTAS leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI?
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTAS leads at 22. 8% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTAS leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 1x for Cintas Corporation — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 52. 0% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the highest yield at 8. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
09Is VSTS or KELYA or CTAS or MAN or RHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 0. 9% yield, +671. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTAS: +671. 6%, VSTS: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSTS and KELYA and CTAS and MAN and RHI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VSTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CTAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(VSTS: -3.0% · KELYA: -100.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.