Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $999M | $9.63B | $3.86B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $-92K | $1.10B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-107M | $-327M | $376M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 91.5% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 7.4% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 50.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $110K | $52M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $357M | $178M | $1.98B |
VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ventyx Biosciences,… (VTYX) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 68.4 | -31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VTYX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 30.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- +10.6% vs IQV's +16.5%
PRAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.26
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.83x
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 50.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 50.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs VTYX's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.6% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs VTYX's -43.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -50.3% |
VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • VTYX leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQV's 8.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$116M | -$357M | $96M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$107M | -$327M | $376M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$88M | -$283M | $212M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +91.5% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +7.4% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +34.3% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +19.4% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +9.7% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.0% | +2.7% | -81.8% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 57% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $999M | $9.6B | $3.9B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $982M | $9.3B | $3.7B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.11x | -24.72x | 9.85x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 50.91x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.91x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 3.61x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.77x | 8.54x | 3.15x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 36.74x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-48 for VTYX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.1% | -43.0% | +35.6% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.9% | -40.2% | +26.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.3% | -65.0% | +10.0% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.2% | -49.3% | +10.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x | 0.04x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$357M | -$126M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $357M | $178M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $110,000 | $52M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VTYX and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,660 for VTYX. Over the past 12 months, VTYX leads with a +1057.0% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs VTYX's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | +16.4% | -13.7% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1057.0% | +775.0% | +52.4% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | +1976.5% | +4.7% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | -20.8% | +7.1% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | -20.1% | -22.9% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.6% | +174.9% | +1.5% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTYX's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs VTYX's 56.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 1.55x | 1.26x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $356.00 | $27.81 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $35.18 | $14.45 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +93.6% | +81.1% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.6 | 55.6 | 44.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.3M | 378K | 1.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VTYX as "Hold", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 0.0% for VTYX (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $544.40 | $34.78 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 37 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
VTYX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -33. 4% for Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. (VTYX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 5% versus VTYX's -33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning VTYX is approximately 61% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 36. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VTYX or PRAX or ACAD or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+166. 5% 10Y return). Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. (VTYX) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQV: +166. 5%, VTYX: -33. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VTYX and PRAX and ACAD and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VTYX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.