Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $999M | $2.72B | $9.63B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $535M | $-92K | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-107M | $-48M | $-327M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.4% | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.5% | — | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $94M | $110K | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $184M | $357M | $551M |
VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ventyx Biosciences,… (VTYX) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS) | 100 | 272.0 | +172.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VTYX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +10.6% vs INVA's +21.7%
TARS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
- 210.8% 10Y total return vs INVA's 94.9%
- 146.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs TARS's -9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 146.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs TARS's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs VTYX's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.6% vs INVA's +21.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs VTYX's -43.9%, ROIC 14.2% vs -50.3% |
VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories
VTYX leads 0 • TARS leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $535M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TARS's -9.0%. On growth, TARS holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $535M | -$92,000 | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$116M | -$49M | -$357M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$107M | -$48M | -$327M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$88M | -$32M | -$283M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.4% | — | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.5% | — | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -9.0% | — | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% | — | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +106.9% | — | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.0% | +75.0% | +2.7% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $999M | $2.7B | $9.6B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $982M | $2.6B | $9.3B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.11x | -40.23x | -24.72x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.03x | — | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.77x | 7.78x | 8.54x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-48 for VTYX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TARS's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARS scores 5/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.1% | -14.2% | -43.0% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.9% | -8.9% | -40.2% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.3% | -23.4% | -65.0% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.2% | -19.6% | -49.3% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.27x | 0.00x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$90M | -$357M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $184M | $357M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $94M | $110,000 | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -18.76x | — | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VTYX and TARS and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TARS five years ago would be worth $21,334 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,660 for VTYX. Over the past 12 months, VTYX leads with a +1057.0% total return vs INVA's +21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs VTYX's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | -20.8% | +16.4% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1057.0% | +35.1% | +775.0% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | +310.3% | +1976.5% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +113.3% | -20.8% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +210.8% | -20.1% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.6% | +60.1% | +174.9% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and INVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTYX's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs VTYX's 56.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.65x | 1.55x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $85.25 | $356.00 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $38.51 | $35.18 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +75.0% | +93.6% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.6 | 46.5 | 55.6 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.3M | 495K | 378K | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VTYX as "Hold", TARS as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.2% upside for INVA (target: $38) vs 0.0% for VTYX (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $89.33 | $544.40 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 9 | 16 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
VTYX vs TARS vs PRAX vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger pick with 146. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) delivered a total return of +113. 3%, compared to -33. 4% for Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. (VTYX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TARS returned +210. 8% versus VTYX's -33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning VTYX is approximately 1509% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 27% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is pulling ahead at 146. 7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TARS leads at 159. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -14. 7% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -15. 7% for TARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARS leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVA: 65.
2% to $37. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VTYX or TARS or PRAX or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. (VTYX) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, VTYX: -33. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VTYX and TARS and PRAX and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VTYX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.