Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VWAV vs OESX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
VWAV vs OESX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $87M | $35M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $81M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.3% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $6M |
Quick Verdict: VWAV vs OESX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VWAV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 84.1% 10Y total return vs OESX's -27.9%
- -2.2% margin vs OESX's -5.6%
- +84.1% vs OESX's +38.4%
OESX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.03
- Rev growth -12.0%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -12.0% revenue growth vs VWAV's -94.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.2% margin vs OESX's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs VWAV's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs OESX's +38.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs VWAV's -104.6% |
VWAV vs OESX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VWAV vs OESX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OESX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OESX and VWAV operate at a comparable scale, with $81M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $81M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$983,526 | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$687,780 | $348M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.6% | +109.6% |
Valuation Metrics
VWAV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87M | $35M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $90M | $39M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.75x | -2.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 71.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OESX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OESX scores 4/9 vs VWAV's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.6% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -34.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -34.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.19x | -3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VWAV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VWAV five years ago would be worth $18,410 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,774 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, VWAV leads with a +84.1% total return vs OESX's +38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VWAV at 22.6% vs OESX's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.9% | -33.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.1% | +38.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.1% | -34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.1% | -82.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.1% | -27.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | -13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
OESX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VWAV's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OESX currently trades 53.0% from its 52-week high vs VWAV's 38.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.80 | $18.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.06 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.1% | +53.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 517K | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
OESX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VWAV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
VWAV vs OESX: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — VWAV or OESX?
Over the past 5 years, VisionWave Holdings, Inc.
(VWAV) delivered a total return of +84. 1%, compared to -82. 3% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VWAV returned +84. 1% versus OESX's -27. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — VWAV or OESX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus VisionWave Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning VWAV is approximately 58% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — VWAV or OESX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -211. 1% for VisionWave Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — VWAV or OESX?
VisionWave Holdings, Inc.
(VWAV) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -14. 8% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VWAV leads at 0. 0% versus -13. 3% for OESX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OESX leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — VWAV or OESX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is VWAV or OESX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). VisionWave Holdings, Inc. (VWAV) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OESX: -27. 9%, VWAV: +84. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between VWAV and OESX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.