Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Household & Personal Products
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Household & Personal Products | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $29M | $102M | $118M | $1.61B | $4.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $570K | $56M | $296M | $4.18B | $3.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-9M | $-6M | $-1.82B | $72M |
| Gross Margin | 99.1% | 67.5% | 64.9% | 34.2% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | -52.2% | -12.2% | -3.6% | -4.1% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.0x | — | 5.6x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $26M | $379M | $3.97B | $124M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $20M | $233M | $532M | $282M |
VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VYNE Therapeutics I… (VYNE) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 63.2 | -36.8% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| Amneal Pharmaceutic… (AMRX) | 100 | 328.2 | +228.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VYNE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.74, current ratio 12.53x
- 13.8% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
- Beta 0.74 vs SKIN's 2.00
DERM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -47.4% 10Y total return vs AMRX's -54.9%
Among these 5 stocks, SKIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 13.8x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
AMRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 157.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 2.17x
- 2.4% margin vs VYNE's -46.5%
- +90.0% vs PRGO's -51.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs VYNE's -46.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SKIN's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.0% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs VYNE's -63.3%, ROIC -0.2% vs -124.0% |
VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMRX leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • VYNE leads 0 • DERM leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 7330.5x VYNE's $570,000. AMRX is the more profitable business, keeping 2.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VYNE's -46.5%. On growth, VYNE holds the edge at +54.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $570,000 | $56M | $296M | $4.2B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | -$3M | $9M | $58M | $169M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$9M | -$6M | -$1.8B | $72M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$3M | $29M | $108M | $150M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.1% | +67.5% | +64.9% | +34.2% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -52.2% | -12.2% | -3.6% | -4.1% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.5% | -15.5% | -2.0% | -43.5% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -58.1% | -4.8% | +9.8% | +2.6% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.8% | +1.0% | -6.7% | -7.2% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +5.9% | +38.0% | -56.4% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $102M | $118M | $1.6B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $108M | $264M | $5.1B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.09x | -6.94x | -5.69x | -1.14x | 62.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 68.97x | — | 5.56x | 13.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7331.15x | 7.42x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.53x | 1.82x | 0.39x | 0.38x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 5.09x | 2.02x | 0.55x | 4.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.17x | 11.12x | 15.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRX delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-74 for VYNE. AMRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMRX scores 8/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.1% | -45.4% | -9.4% | -50.7% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.3% | -10.8% | -1.2% | -19.8% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -124.0% | -56.8% | -6.8% | +3.7% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.5% | -34.2% | -4.5% | +4.3% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.28x | 6.20x | 1.35x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $5M | $146M | $3.4B | -$158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $20M | $233M | $532M | $282M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $26M | $379M | $4.0B | $124M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.52x | 0.81x | -7.20x | 2.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMRX five years ago would be worth $26,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $103 for VYNE. Over the past 12 months, AMRX leads with a +90.0% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMRX at 89.4% vs VYNE's -57.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.1% | -32.9% | -35.0% | -13.5% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.8% | -28.1% | -35.9% | -51.2% | +90.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.2% | +203.0% | -91.7% | -58.1% | +579.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -47.4% | -92.9% | -60.1% | +163.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -47.4% | -91.6% | -77.7% | -54.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.3% | +44.7% | -56.4% | -25.2% | +89.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VYNE and AMRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VYNE is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIN's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMRX currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.82x | 2.00x | 1.18x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.96 | $9.55 | $2.69 | $28.44 | $15.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $4.31 | $0.76 | $9.23 | $7.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +52.3% | +33.8% | +41.2% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 44.3 | 52.1 | 60.9 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 192K | 230K | 760K | 3.4M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DERM as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold", PRGO as "Hold", AMRX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 23.9% for AMRX (target: $17). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.75 | $1.30 | $20.00 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 13 | 36 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMRX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
VYNE vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs AMRX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VYNE Therapeutics Inc.
(VYNE) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) offers the better valuation at 62. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX?
Over the past 5 years, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) delivered a total return of +163. 8%, compared to -99. 0% for VYNE Therapeutics Inc. (VYNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DERM returned -47. 4% versus VYNE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VYNE Therapeutics Inc.
(VYNE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus The Beauty Health Company's 2. 00β — meaning SKIN is approximately 171% more volatile than VYNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VYNE Therapeutics Inc.
(VYNE) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 157. 9% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMRX leads at 10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX?
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus -46. 5% for VYNE Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGO leads at 8. 1% versus -52. 2% for VYNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VYNE leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. VYNE, DERM, SKIN, AMRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VYNE or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or AMRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), 9. 8% yield). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRGO: -77. 7%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VYNE and DERM and SKIN and PRGO and AMRX?
These companies operate in different sectors (VYNE (Healthcare) and DERM (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and PRGO (Healthcare) and AMRX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VYNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while VYNE, DERM, SKIN, AMRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.