Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.04B | $16.78B | $10.28B | $4.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.28B | $4.69B | $3.36B | $1.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $969M | $1.33B | $537M | $418M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 60.1% | 57.1% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 37.4% | 19.8% | 49.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 11.5x | 13.0x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $6.48B | $3.17B | $4.45B | $705M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.60B | $656M | $1.43B | $536M |
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 348.9 | +248.9% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 23.1%
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 11.5x)
- 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%
EWBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 281.4% 10Y total return vs IBOC's 229.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
- +44.8% vs WAL's +17.5%
IBOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- PEG 0.53 vs BOKF's 4.38
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.04x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs WAL's +17.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4% |
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories
WAL leads 1 • EWBC leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 5.0x IBOC's $1.1B. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $4.7B | $3.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.0B | $797M | $417M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $969M | $1.3B | $537M | $418M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $360M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +60.1% | +57.1% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +37.4% | +19.8% | +49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +28.3% | +15.6% | +39.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | +32.0% | +42.6% | +47.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +21.4% | +1.8% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 42% valuation discount to BOKF's 16.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.0B | $16.8B | $10.3B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $19.3B | $13.3B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.43x | 12.81x | 16.39x | 11.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 11.47x | 13.05x | 10.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 0.67x | 5.51x | 0.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.88x | 9.49x | 17.23x | 8.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 3.58x | 3.06x | 4.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 1.91x | 1.53x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.17x | 7.19x | 9.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. IBOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.8% | +15.8% | +8.9% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +11.2% | +4.1% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +3.9% | +5.5% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.36x | 0.80x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $2.5B | $3.0B | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $656M | $1.4B | $536M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $3.2B | $4.5B | $705M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 1.01x | 0.55x | 1.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WAL and EWBC and BOKF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,397 for WAL. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs WAL's +17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.0% vs BOKF's 21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | +7.4% | +13.0% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +42.7% | +44.8% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.0% | +187.3% | +79.4% | +88.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.0% | +68.1% | +59.4% | +61.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.3% | +281.4% | +168.5% | +229.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.0% | +42.2% | +21.5% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
IBOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs WAL's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.22x | 1.03x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.23 | $127.52 | $139.73 | $75.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.81 | $86.58 | $91.35 | $61.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +95.6% | +95.5% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 66.3 | 58.9 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.0M | 317K | 373K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAL and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAL as "Buy", EWBC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for IBOC (target: $85) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, WAL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.83 | $130.67 | $131.57 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 24 | 21 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 9 | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $2.40 | $2.24 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +0.1% |
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WAL vs EWBC vs BOKF vs IBOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC?
On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.
4x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -16. 0% for Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus WAL's +166. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 109% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Alliance Bancorporation grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBOC: 16. 0% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is WAL or EWBC or BOKF or IBOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, WAL: +166. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAL and EWBC and BOKF and IBOC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.