Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Waste Management
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Water | Waste Management | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $48M | $529M | $207M | $955M | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $168K | $132M | $59M | $199M | $679M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $18M | $-18M | $44M | $134M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 36.6% | 4.1% | 33.3% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 139015.1% | -26.3% | 28.1% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.6x | — | 20.1x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $708.60B | $4M | $419M | $943M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $123.79T | $12M | $3M | $19M |
WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eco Wave Power Glob… (WAVE) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
| American States Wat… (AWR) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAVE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CWCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 155.1%
MSEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 22.1% margin vs WAVE's -17.6%
AWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- PEG 2.70 vs MSEX's 12.58
- 10.5% revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3%
- 6.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 8.0% vs -205.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs WAVE's -17.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AWR's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 8.0% vs -205.2% |
WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WAVE leads in 1 of 6 categories
AWR leads 1 • CWCO leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CWCO and AWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $679M annually — 4043.2x WAVE's $168,000. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAVE's -17.6%. On growth, AWR holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $168,000 | $132M | $59M | $199M | $679M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $25.98T | -$14M | $81M | $259M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $18M | -$18M | $44M | $134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $33.67T | -$14M | -$19M | -$34M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +36.6% | +4.1% | +33.3% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +139015.1% | -26.3% | +28.1% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.6% | +13.9% | -30.1% | +22.1% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.2% | +254916.5% | -23.4% | -9.7% | -5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | -20.1% | +10.0% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -177.8% | -11.5% | -110.5% | -100.0% | +8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CWCO and PESI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.8x trailing earnings, MSEX trades at a 4% valuation discount to AWR's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AWR offers better value at 2.98x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $529M | $207M | $955M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | -$123.08T | $200M | $1.4B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.83x | — | -14.89x | 21.78x | 22.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.60x | — | 20.12x | 20.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 13.62x | 2.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -4.74x | — | 15.79x | 15.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1254.97x | 4.01x | 3.36x | 4.91x | 4.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.74x | 0.00x | 4.11x | 1.89x | 2.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.00x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CWCO and AWR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWR delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-41 for WAVE. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWR's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWR scores 6/9 vs WAVE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.9% | 0.0% | -34.5% | +9.1% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.7% | 0.0% | -20.2% | +3.2% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | +26.6% | -21.7% | +4.7% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.1% | +16.0% | -16.7% | +4.4% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.00x | 0.09x | 0.85x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$123.08T | -$7M | $416M | $924M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $123.79T | $12M | $3M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $708.6B | $4M | $419M | $943M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.45x | — | -42.14x | 4.33x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,369 for WAVE. Over the past 12 months, CWCO leads with a +47.9% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAVE at 45.4% vs MSEX's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.4% | -3.9% | -8.8% | +3.0% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +47.9% | +26.2% | -12.8% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.5% | +101.4% | +21.7% | -25.2% | -9.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +197.4% | +45.6% | -28.4% | +7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +155.1% | +178.6% | +62.9% | +123.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.4% | +26.3% | +6.8% | -9.2% | -3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWR is the less volatile stock with a -0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AWR currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs PESI's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.76x | 1.85x | -0.12x | -0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.87 | $39.12 | $16.50 | $62.18 | $82.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.41 | $22.69 | $8.02 | $44.17 | $69.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +84.8% | +67.7% | +82.7% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 47.9 | 41.5 | 44.1 | 46.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 163K | 164K | 160K | 298K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and AWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", MSEX as "Buy", AWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 4.1% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AWR's 2.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | $53.50 | $89.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | — | +2.7% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | 21 | 24 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $497756.41 | — | $1.37 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WAVE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). AWR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.
WAVE vs CWCO vs PESI vs MSEX vs AWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American States Water Company (AWR) is the stronger pick with 10.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) offers the better valuation at 21. 8x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR?
On trailing P/E, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the cheapest at 21.
8x versus American States Water Company at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American States Water Company wins at 2. 70x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -56. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus WAVE's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American States Water Company (AWR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
17β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately -1174% more volatile than AWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 90% for American States Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American States Water Company (AWR) is pulling ahead at 10.
5% versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAVE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -97. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus -84. 2% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWR leads at 50. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American States Water Company (AWR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 70x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield), AWR (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. WAVE, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WAVE or CWCO or PESI or MSEX or AWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American States Water Company (AWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
17), 2. 5% yield, +123. 2% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWR: +123. 2%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAVE and CWCO and PESI and MSEX and AWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (WAVE (Utilities) and CWCO (Utilities) and PESI (Industrials) and MSEX (Utilities) and AWR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WAVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CWCO, MSEX, AWR pay a dividend while WAVE, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.