Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $17.10B | $58.41B | $5.82B | $50.93B | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.25B | $18.38B | $3.81B | $8.20B | $2.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $676M | $1.78B | $205M | $1.26B | $89M |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | 39.2% | 40.7% | 45.0% | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 14.2% | 8.4% | 20.2% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 28.3x | 24.0x | 35.9x | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $7.48B | $3.16B | $539M | $442M | $982M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $605M | $585M | $56M | $277M | $304M |
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WESCO International… (WCC) | 100 | 1053.7 | +953.7% |
| W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| Fastenal Company (FAST) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| DXP Enterprises, In… (DXPE) | 100 | 850.9 | +750.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.42 vs FAST's 4.62
- Lower P/E (22.4x vs 24.5x)
- +122.0% vs FAST's +15.4%
Among these 5 stocks, GWW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.3%
- 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FAST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 4.85x
- Beta 0.69, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.85x
- 15.3% margin vs WCC's 2.8%
- Beta 0.69 vs WCC's 1.83, lower leverage
DXPE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 27.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs WCC's 5.4%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs WCC's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs WCC's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.0% vs FAST's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.9% ROA vs WCC's 4.1%, ROIC 31.2% vs 8.5% |
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FAST leads in 2 of 6 categories
WCC leads 1 • DXPE leads 1 • GWW leads 0 • MSM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FAST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.2B annually — 12.0x DXPE's $2.0B. FAST is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WCC's 2.8%. On growth, WCC holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.2B | $18.4B | $3.8B | $8.2B | $2.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $2.8B | $414M | $1.8B | $216M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $676M | $1.8B | $205M | $1.3B | $89M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $216M | $1.4B | $167M | $1.1B | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +39.2% | +40.7% | +45.0% | +31.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +14.2% | +8.4% | +20.2% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +9.7% | +5.4% | +15.3% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +7.5% | +4.4% | +12.8% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +10.1% | +4.0% | +11.1% | +12.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.1% | +18.2% | +12.0% | +13.0% | +7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WCC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, WCC trades at a 34% valuation discount to FAST's 40.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WCC offers better value at 0.50x vs FAST's 5.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.1B | $58.4B | $5.8B | $50.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.0B | $61.0B | $6.3B | $51.1B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.89x | 34.86x | 29.22x | 40.70x | 27.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.40x | 28.29x | 23.99x | 35.86x | 24.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.50x | 1.56x | — | 5.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.42x | 20.71x | 15.61x | 30.86x | 13.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 3.26x | 1.54x | 6.21x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.46x | 14.30x | 4.17x | 12.94x | 4.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 678.70x | 43.88x | 24.17x | 48.48x | 43.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FAST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW delivers a 43.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $14 for WCC. FAST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DXPE's 1.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWW scores 8/9 vs WCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +43.1% | +14.8% | +31.9% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +19.7% | +8.2% | +24.9% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +32.1% | +12.3% | +31.2% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +39.7% | +17.5% | +39.7% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.49x | 0.76x | 0.39x | 0.11x | 1.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.9B | $2.6B | $483M | $165M | $678M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $605M | $585M | $56M | $277M | $304M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $3.2B | $539M | $442M | $982M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.29x | 22.63x | 12.56x | 259.39x | 2.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DXPE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DXPE five years ago would be worth $46,489 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,874 for MSM. Over the past 12 months, WCC leads with a +122.0% total return vs FAST's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DXPE at 83.0% vs MSM's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +23.2% | +23.5% | +10.9% | +39.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.0% | +19.1% | +43.8% | +15.4% | +69.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.1% | +85.3% | +26.0% | +73.1% | +513.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.5% | +173.2% | +28.7% | +81.3% | +364.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +537.7% | +463.0% | +87.3% | +338.1% | +699.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +22.8% | +8.0% | +20.1% | +83.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSM and FAST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FAST is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WCC's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs DXPE's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.89x | 0.86x | 0.69x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $368.90 | $1286.56 | $107.09 | $50.63 | $183.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $157.48 | $906.52 | $74.30 | $38.97 | $75.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +95.9% | +97.4% | +87.6% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 58.3 | 68.3 | 46.9 | 74.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 575K | 239K | 604K | 7.3M | 175K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GWW and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WCC as "Buy", GWW as "Hold", MSM as "Hold", FAST as "Hold", DXPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for FAST (target: $47) vs -6.3% for MSM (target: $98). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs WCC's 0.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $360.14 | $1157.43 | $97.75 | $46.57 | $154.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 38 | 28 | 31 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.8% | +3.3% | +2.0% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 37 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $9.73 | $3.39 | $0.87 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
FAST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WCC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs DXPE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DXP Enterprises, Inc.
(DXPE) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE?
On trailing P/E, WESCO International, Inc.
(WCC) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus Fastenal Company at 40. 7x. On forward P/E, WESCO International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WESCO International, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE?
Over the past 5 years, DXP Enterprises, Inc.
(DXPE) delivered a total return of +364. 9%, compared to +28. 7% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DXPE returned +699. 3% versus MSM's +87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastenal Company (FAST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus WESCO International, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning WCC is approximately 164% more volatile than FAST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastenal Company (FAST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 197% for DXP Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DXP Enterprises, Inc.
(DXPE) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DXP Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS 27. 0% year-over-year, compared to -22. 1% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DXPE leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE?
Fastenal Company (FAST) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
3% net margin versus 2. 7% for WESCO International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FAST leads at 20. 2% versus 5. 2% for WCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAST leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for Fastenal Company — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FAST: 5. 0% to $46. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE?
In this comparison, MSM (3.
3% yield), FAST (2. 0% yield), GWW (0. 8% yield), WCC (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. DXPE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or DXPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 2. 0% yield, +338. 1% 10Y return). DXP Enterprises, Inc. (DXPE) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FAST: +338. 1%, DXPE: +699. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WCC and GWW and MSM and FAST and DXPE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WCC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GWW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FAST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DXPE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WCC, GWW, MSM, FAST pay a dividend while DXPE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.