Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $17.10B | $58.41B | $5.82B | $50.93B | $5.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.25B | $18.38B | $3.81B | $8.20B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $676M | $1.78B | $205M | $1.26B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | 39.2% | 40.7% | 45.0% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 14.2% | 8.4% | 20.2% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 28.3x | 24.0x | 35.9x | 28.7x |
| Total Debt | $7.48B | $3.16B | $539M | $442M | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $605M | $585M | $56M | $277M | $191M |
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WESCO International… (WCC) | 100 | 1053.7 | +953.7% |
| W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| Fastenal Company (FAST) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs GWW's 463.0%
- PEG 0.42 vs SITE's 6.91
- Lower P/E (22.4x vs 35.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 4.62
- +122.0% vs SITE's +5.6%
GWW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.3%
- 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FAST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 4.85x
- Beta 0.69, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.85x
- 8.7% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3%
Among these 5 stocks, SITE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 35.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 4.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs WCC's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs WCC's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.0% vs SITE's +5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.9% ROA vs WCC's 4.1%, ROIC 31.2% vs 8.5% |
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FAST leads in 2 of 6 categories
WCC leads 2 • GWW leads 0 • MSM leads 0 • SITE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FAST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.2B annually — 6.4x MSM's $3.8B. FAST is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WCC's 2.8%. On growth, WCC holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.2B | $18.4B | $3.8B | $8.2B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $2.8B | $414M | $1.8B | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $676M | $1.8B | $205M | $1.3B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $216M | $1.4B | $167M | $1.1B | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +39.2% | +40.7% | +45.0% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +14.2% | +8.4% | +20.2% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +9.7% | +5.4% | +15.3% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +7.5% | +4.4% | +12.8% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +10.1% | +4.0% | +11.1% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.1% | +18.2% | +12.0% | +13.0% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
WCC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, WCC trades at a 34% valuation discount to FAST's 40.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WCC offers better value at 0.50x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.1B | $58.4B | $5.8B | $50.9B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.0B | $61.0B | $6.3B | $51.1B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.89x | 34.86x | 29.22x | 40.70x | 37.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.40x | 28.29x | 23.99x | 35.86x | 28.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.50x | 1.56x | — | 5.24x | 8.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.42x | 20.71x | 15.61x | 30.86x | 16.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 3.26x | 1.54x | 6.21x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.46x | 14.30x | 4.17x | 12.94x | 3.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 678.70x | 43.88x | 24.17x | 48.48x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FAST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW delivers a 43.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $9 for SITE. FAST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WCC's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWW scores 8/9 vs WCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +43.1% | +14.8% | +31.9% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +19.7% | +8.2% | +24.9% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +32.1% | +12.3% | +31.2% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +39.7% | +17.5% | +39.7% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.49x | 0.76x | 0.39x | 0.11x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.9B | $2.6B | $483M | $165M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $605M | $585M | $56M | $277M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $3.2B | $539M | $442M | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.29x | 22.63x | 12.56x | 259.39x | 6.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WCC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WCC five years ago would be worth $32,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,157 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, WCC leads with a +122.0% total return vs SITE's +5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WCC at 39.9% vs SITE's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +23.2% | +23.5% | +10.9% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.0% | +19.1% | +43.8% | +15.4% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.1% | +85.3% | +26.0% | +73.1% | -18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.5% | +173.2% | +28.7% | +81.3% | -38.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +537.7% | +463.0% | +87.3% | +338.1% | +368.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +22.8% | +8.0% | +20.1% | -6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSM and FAST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FAST is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WCC's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs SITE's 74.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.89x | 0.86x | 0.69x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $368.90 | $1286.56 | $107.09 | $50.63 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $157.48 | $906.52 | $74.30 | $38.97 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +95.9% | +97.4% | +87.6% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 58.3 | 68.3 | 46.9 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 575K | 239K | 604K | 7.3M | 689K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GWW and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WCC as "Buy", GWW as "Hold", MSM as "Hold", FAST as "Hold", SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.9% upside for SITE (target: $162) vs -6.3% for MSM (target: $98). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs WCC's 0.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $360.14 | $1157.43 | $97.75 | $46.57 | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 38 | 28 | 31 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.8% | +3.3% | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 37 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $9.73 | $3.39 | $0.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
FAST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WCC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
WCC vs GWW vs MSM vs FAST vs SITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE?
On trailing P/E, WESCO International, Inc.
(WCC) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus Fastenal Company at 40. 7x. On forward P/E, WESCO International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WESCO International, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, WESCO International, Inc.
(WCC) delivered a total return of +225. 5%, compared to -38. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WCC returned +537. 7% versus MSM's +87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastenal Company (FAST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus WESCO International, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning WCC is approximately 164% more volatile than FAST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastenal Company (FAST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 149% for WESCO International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fastenal Company (FAST) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -22. 1% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWW leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE?
Fastenal Company (FAST) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
3% net margin versus 2. 7% for WESCO International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FAST leads at 20. 2% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAST leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for Fastenal Company — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITE: 29. 9% to $162. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE?
In this comparison, MSM (3.
3% yield), FAST (2. 0% yield), GWW (0. 8% yield), WCC (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SITE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WCC or GWW or MSM or FAST or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 2. 0% yield, +338. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FAST: +338. 1%, SITE: +368. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WCC and GWW and MSM and FAST and SITE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WCC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GWW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FAST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WCC, GWW, MSM, FAST pay a dividend while SITE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.