Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WFF
WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • MY
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-91.3%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$340K
5Y Perf.-96.4%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204M
5Y Perf.+51.3%
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$548M
5Y Perf.+34.7%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.-23.4%

WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WFF logoWFF
RETO logoRETO
PESI logoPESI
CLFD logoCLFD
CWST logoCWST
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryConstruction MaterialsWaste ManagementCommunication EquipmentWaste Management
Market Cap$9M$340K$204M$548M$5.35B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$9M$59M$136M$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$112K$-25M$-18M$-9M$7M
Gross Margin40.4%14.0%4.1%37.2%17.4%
Operating Margin2.5%-237.8%-26.3%1.4%4.5%
Forward P/E86.5x75.9x62.7x
Total Debt$429K$110K$4M$9M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$671K$12M$21M$124M

WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WFF
RETO
PESI
CLFD
CWST
StockMar 25May 26Return
WF Holding Limited … (WFF)1008.6-91.3%
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1003.6-96.4%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100151.3+51.3%
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD)100134.7+34.7%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)10076.6-23.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WFF and CLFD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Clearfield, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. CWST also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WFF
WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares
The Quality Compounder

WFF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 2.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
  • 1.9% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 3.9% vs -14.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.74
Best for: income & stability
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
  • Beta 1.74, current ratio 5.42x
  • 19.6% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CWST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 174.4%
  • Lower P/E (62.7x vs 75.9x)
  • Beta 0.33 vs WFF's 1.77
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLFD logoCLFD19.6% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
ValueCWST logoCWSTLower P/E (62.7x vs 75.9x)
Quality / MarginsWFF logoWFF2.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.33 vs WFF's 1.77
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLFD logoCLFD+25.8% vs RETO's -96.3%
Efficiency (ROA)WFF logoWFF1.9% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 3.9% vs -14.5%

WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WFFWF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CLFDClearfield, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWFFLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WFF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 410.5x WFF's $5M. WFF is the more profitable business, keeping 2.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWFF logoWFFWF Holding Limite…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$9M$59M$136M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M-$14M$6M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$18M-$9M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$13M$16M$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.4%+14.0%+4.1%+37.2%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.5%-2.4%-26.3%+1.4%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.4%-2.9%-30.1%-6.3%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.4%-77.8%-22.0%+11.8%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.0%-20.1%-27.1%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.8%-110.5%-142.5%-18.6%
WFF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — RETO and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 86.5x trailing earnings, WFF trades at a 88% valuation discount to CWST's 712.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 65.0x.

MetricWFF logoWFFWF Holding Limite…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$9M$340,425$204M$548M$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8M-$221,330$197M$535M$6.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS86.50x-0.04x-14.67x-69.03x712.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.75.91x62.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.05x64.96x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.91x0.19x3.31x3.65x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.15x0.01x4.05x2.19x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.42x22.18x63.16x
Evenly matched — RETO and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WFF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

WFF delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWFF logoWFFWF Holding Limite…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.2%-183.4%-34.5%-3.4%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%-75.1%-20.2%-3.0%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.9%-14.5%-21.7%+0.6%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.8%-21.6%-16.7%+0.8%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.00x0.09x0.03x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$627,999-$561,755-$7M-$13M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$671,355$12M$21M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$428,733$109,600$4M$9M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.68x-31.78x-42.14x65.80x1.12x
WFF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PESI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, CLFD leads with a +25.8% total return vs RETO's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.2% vs RETO's -92.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWFF logoWFFWF Holding Limite…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-21.4%-67.5%-10.2%+35.8%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.3%-96.3%+15.8%+25.8%-27.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.8%-100.0%+19.8%+11.0%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.8%-100.0%+46.7%+12.5%+26.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.8%-100.0%+174.4%+120.7%+1059.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-54.8%-92.1%+6.2%+3.5%-2.2%
PESI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLFD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFF's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs WFF's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWFF logoWFFWF Holding Limite…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.77x1.75x1.74x1.74x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$146.30$19.55$16.50$46.76$121.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.39$0.48$8.02$24.01$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.2%+3.2%+66.7%+85.6%+70.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.643.435.777.454.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded194K911K164K163K849K
Evenly matched — CLFD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CLFD as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.6% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 8.2% for CLFD (target: $43).

MetricWFF logoWFFWF Holding Limite…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$43.33$112.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts1819
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

WFF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallWF Holding Limited Ordinary… (WFF)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WFF vs RETO vs PESI vs CLFD vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.

(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (WFF) offers the better valuation at 86. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST?

On trailing P/E, WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (WFF) is the cheapest at 86.

5x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 0x. On forward P/E, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 62. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 77β — meaning WFF is approximately 434% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.

(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -79. 7% for WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST?

WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (WFF) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

4% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) trades at 62. 7x forward P/E versus 75. 9x for Clearfield, Inc. — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 63. 6% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is WFF or RETO or PESI or CLFD or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1059% 10Y return). WF Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (WFF) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, WFF: -90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WFF and RETO and PESI and CLFD and CWST?

These companies operate in different sectors (WFF (Industrials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WFF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WFF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLFD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WFF and RETO and PESI and CLFD and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WFF: -20.3% · RETO: 49.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.