REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $777M | $293M | $15.87B | $14.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $99M | $90M | $2.16B | $1.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $176M | $616M | $630M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | -42.1% | 54.7% | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.7% | -10.8% | 36.1% | 54.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.6x | 30.0x | 31.9x |
| Total Debt | $484M | $74M | $8.64B | $5.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $119M | $213M | $121M |
WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLRP) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
| SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
| Regency Centers Cor… (REG) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHLRP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +81.8% vs REG's +12.2%
SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.05 vs REG's 0.52
- Beta 1.05, yield 100.0%, current ratio 36.38x
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 31.9x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.52
- 195.7% margin vs WHLRP's 11.9%
KIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 50.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
REG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 3.6%
- 28.9% 10Y total return vs KIM's 11.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 82.7%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.36 vs SITC's 1.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 31.9x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.52 | |
| Quality / Margins | 195.7% margin vs WHLRP's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs SITC's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs REG's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.8% vs REG's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.2% ROA vs WHLRP's 1.9%, ROIC -0.2% vs 4.8% |
WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories
REG leads 1 • WHLRP leads 1 • KIM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 24.1x SITC's $90M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 195.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHLRP's 11.9%. On growth, REG holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99M | $90M | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $28M | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $176M | $616M | $630M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $133M | $844M | $700M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | -42.1% | +54.7% | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | -10.8% | +36.1% | +54.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +195.7% | +28.5% | +37.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +148.5% | +39.0% | +41.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | -78.3% | +4.0% | +31.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -118.3% | -66.7% | +27.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SITC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 94% valuation discount to KIM's 28.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SITC offers better value at 0.05x vs REG's 0.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $293M | $15.9B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $248M | $24.3B | $20.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 1.65x | 28.35x | 27.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 30.04x | 31.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.05x | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.82x | 5.73x | 17.70x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.74x | 2.38x | 7.41x | 9.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.21x | 0.87x | 1.50x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 193.04x | 14.93x | 20.54x | 36.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC delivers a 48.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $6 for KIM. SITC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHLRP's 5.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WHLRP scores 6/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +48.0% | +5.8% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +32.2% | +3.1% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | -0.2% | +3.0% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | -0.3% | +3.9% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.11x | 0.22x | 0.82x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $460M | -$45M | $8.4B | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $119M | $213M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $484M | $74M | $8.6B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.44x | 12.60x | 2.46x | 2.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WHLRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REG five years ago would be worth $13,947 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,170 for SITC. Over the past 12 months, WHLRP leads with a +81.8% total return vs REG's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WHLRP at 70.4% vs SITC's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.6% | -12.8% | +18.6% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.8% | +29.3% | +18.9% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +394.6% | -64.2% | +43.6% | +44.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.6% | -68.3% | +31.1% | +39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | -78.5% | +11.1% | +28.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +70.4% | -29.0% | +12.8% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WHLRP and KIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WHLRP is the less volatile stock with a -0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KIM currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs SITC's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.37x | 1.06x | 0.54x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.75 | $13.10 | $24.31 | $81.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.14 | $5.24 | $19.76 | $66.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +42.6% | +96.8% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 54.6 | 58.4 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 777K | 5.0M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SITC and REG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WHLRP as "Buy", SITC as "Hold", KIM as "Hold", REG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.4% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs 2.9% for REG (target: $80). For income investors, SITC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs WHLRP's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $24.25 | $80.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 31 | 36 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +100.0% | +4.5% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $6.78 | $1.06 | $2.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). REG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WHLRP vs SITC vs KIM vs REG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLRP) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG?
On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Kimco Realty Corporation at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG?
Over the past 5 years, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) delivered a total return of +39.
5%, compared to -68. 3% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REG returned +28. 6% versus SITC's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
(WHLRP) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 37β versus SITE Centers Corp. 's 1. 06β — meaning SITC is approximately -384% more volatile than WHLRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. grew EPS 88. 6% year-over-year, compared to -65. 3% for SITE Centers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WHLRP leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG?
SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 144. 4% net margin versus 8. 7% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 144. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REG leads at 37. 0% versus -1. 3% for SITC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KIM leads at 54. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.
0x forward P/E versus 31. 9x for Regency Centers Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 43. 4% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLRP).
09Is WHLRP or SITC or KIM or REG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
(WHLRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 37), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHLRP: -36. 3%, SITC: -78. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHLRP and SITC and KIM and REG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WHLRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SITC is a small-cap deep-value stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; REG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.