Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WING vs BROS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
WING vs BROS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $3.96B | $7.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $709M | $1.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $81M |
| Gross Margin | 82.6% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 31.9x | 66.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $1.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $239M | $269M |
WING vs BROS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wingstop Inc. (WING) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
| Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WING vs BROS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WING carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 0.8%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs BROS's 61.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, current ratio 3.26x
BROS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 103.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.4%
- 27.9% revenue growth vs WING's 11.4%
- -0.9% vs WING's -45.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs WING's 11.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.9x vs 66.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs BROS's 4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs BROS's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.9% vs WING's -45.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.1% ROA vs BROS's 2.7%, ROIC 46.0% vs 7.7% |
WING vs BROS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WING vs BROS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WING leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.5x WING's $709M. WING is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BROS's 4.6%. On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $709M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $225M | $244M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $148M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.6% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +30.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.7% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WING leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, WING trades at a 75% valuation discount to BROS's 93.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WING's 23.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BROS's 30.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.42x | 93.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.85x | 66.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.25x | 30.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.68x | 4.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.50x | 137.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WING and BROS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.1% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +46.0% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.0% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $239M | $269M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.43x | 9.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BROS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BROS five years ago would be worth $16,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,168 for WING. Over the past 12 months, BROS leads with a -0.9% total return vs WING's -45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BROS at 22.3% vs WING's -10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.3% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.1% | -0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +83.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +551.6% | +61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.4% | +22.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WING and BROS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WING is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BROS's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BROS currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs WING's 37.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $388.14 | $77.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $142.24 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.5% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.9 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
BROS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WING as "Hold" and BROS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.2% upside for WING (target: $296) vs 26.1% for BROS (target: $74). WING is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $295.50 | $74.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | 0.0% |
WING leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BROS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
WING vs BROS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WING or BROS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 4% for Wingstop Inc. (WING). Wingstop Inc. (WING) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (31. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WING or BROS?
On trailing P/E, Wingstop Inc.
(WING) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Dutch Bros Inc. at 93. 7x. On forward P/E, Wingstop Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WING or BROS?
Over the past 5 years, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) delivered a total return of +61. 0%, compared to +1. 7% for Wingstop Inc. (WING). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WING returned +551. 6% versus BROS's +61. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WING or BROS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wingstop Inc.
(WING) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Dutch Bros Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning BROS is approximately 42% more volatile than WING relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — WING or BROS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus 11. 4% for Wingstop Inc. (WING). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dutch Bros Inc. grew EPS 103. 2% year-over-year, compared to 67. 8% for Wingstop Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WING or BROS?
Wingstop Inc.
(WING) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 0% net margin versus 4. 9% for Dutch Bros Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WING leads at 27. 6% versus 9. 8% for BROS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WING leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WING or BROS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wingstop Inc.
(WING) trades at 31. 9x forward P/E versus 66. 5x for Dutch Bros Inc. — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WING: 103. 2% to $295. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WING or BROS?
In this comparison, WING (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BROS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WING or BROS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wingstop Inc.
(WING) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), 0. 8% yield, +551. 6% 10Y return). Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WING: +551. 6%, BROS: +61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WING and BROS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WING is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock. WING pays a dividend while BROS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.