Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Entertainment
Travel Services
Internet Content & Information
WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Consumer Electronics | Entertainment | Travel Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $17.42B | $120.26B | $37.94B | $4.29B | $86.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.13B | $12.14T | $25.61B | $1.04B | $17.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $452M | $-230.22B | $84M | $57M | $2.72B |
| Gross Margin | 45.8% | 31.0% | 40.3% | 73.4% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 12.0% | 3.4% | 14.1% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 0.1x | — | 69.3x | 32.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.61B | $4.20T | $12.44B | $237M | $2.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $532M | $2.98T | $7.11B | $509M | $5.26B |
WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| Sony Group Corporat… (SONY) | 100 | 145.7 | +45.7% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 368.3 | +268.3% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 312.3 | +212.3% |
| Spotify Technology … (SPOT) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.78, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.66x
- 2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SONY's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +23.1% vs MMYT's -50.7%
SONY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 32.3x)
LYV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs SONY's 338.8%
MMYT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- 25.0% revenue growth vs SONY's -0.5%
SPOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 27.9%, current ratio 1.72x
- 15.5% margin vs SONY's -1.9%
- Beta 0.57 vs MMYT's 1.21
- 19.3% ROA vs SONY's -0.8%, ROIC 40.5% vs 10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs SONY's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 32.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.5% margin vs SONY's -1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs MMYT's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SONY's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.1% vs MMYT's -50.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs SONY's -0.8%, ROIC 40.5% vs 10.7% |
WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MMYT leads in 1 of 6 categories
SONY leads 1 • SPOT leads 1 • LYV leads 1 • WMG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SONY is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.14T annually — 11681.0x MMYT's $1.0B. SPOT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SONY's -1.9%. On growth, WMG holds the edge at +16.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.1B | $12.14T | $25.6B | $1.0B | $17.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.60T | $1.6B | $175M | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $452M | -$230.2B | $84M | $57M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $697M | $1.74T | $1.2B | $224M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.8% | +31.0% | +40.3% | +73.4% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +12.0% | +3.4% | +14.1% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | -1.9% | +0.3% | +5.5% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +14.3% | +4.8% | +21.5% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -14.3% | +12.1% | +10.6% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -3.8% | -4.8% | -68.3% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SONY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, SONY trades at a 71% valuation discount to MMYT's 57.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SONY's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPOT's 30.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.4B | $120.3B | $37.9B | $4.3B | $86.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.5B | $128.0B | $43.3B | $4.0B | $82.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.66x | 16.82x | -680.33x | 57.64x | 33.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.62x | 0.10x | — | 69.30x | 32.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.10x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.60x | 11.20x | 19.57x | 27.30x | 30.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 1.46x | 1.51x | 4.38x | 4.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.87x | 2.26x | 20.81x | 4.54x | 9.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.32x | 11.27x | 113.73x | 24.69x | 25.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMG delivers a 55.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SONY. MMYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SONY scores 8/9 vs WMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.9% | -2.7% | +4.4% | +8.2% | +35.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | -0.8% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +10.7% | +19.7% | +9.2% | +40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | +5.8% | +13.4% | +9.2% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.09x | 0.49x | 6.84x | 0.20x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $1.22T | $5.3B | -$272M | -$2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $532M | $2.98T | $7.1B | $509M | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $4.20T | $12.4B | $237M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.43x | 27.54x | 3.68x | 1.67x | 84.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYV five years ago would be worth $19,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,986 for WMG. Over the past 12 months, WMG leads with a +23.1% total return vs MMYT's -50.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOT at 42.5% vs SONY's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.2% | -22.1% | +12.4% | -41.6% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.1% | -17.3% | +21.2% | -50.7% | -36.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.6% | +10.7% | +109.8% | +87.1% | +189.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | +6.2% | +96.6% | +91.4% | +83.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.0% | +338.8% | +609.3% | +174.8% | +180.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.6% | +3.5% | +28.0% | +23.2% | +42.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMG and SPOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MMYT's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMG currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs MMYT's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.09x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.63 | $30.34 | $175.25 | $110.59 | $785.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.34 | $19.63 | $125.34 | $32.84 | $405.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +66.4% | +93.2% | +43.3% | +53.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 42.3 | 61.2 | 61.7 | 33.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 5.6M | 2.8M | 1.5M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMG and SONY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMG as "Buy", SONY as "Buy", LYV as "Buy", MMYT as "Buy", SPOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 12.6% for LYV (target: $184). For income investors, WMG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.21% vs SONY's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.43 | $30.00 | $183.88 | $91.00 | $622.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 16 | 44 | 11 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +0.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 5 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $18.97 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.5% | +0.1% | +0.5% | +0.6% |
MMYT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SONY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WMG vs SONY vs LYV vs MMYT vs SPOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Sony Group Corporation (SONY). Sony Group Corporation (SONY) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT?
On trailing P/E, Sony Group Corporation (SONY) is the cheapest at 16.
8x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Sony Group Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT?
Over the past 5 years, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) delivered a total return of +96. 6%, compared to -0. 1% for Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +609. 3% versus WMG's +23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus MakeMyTrip Limited's 1. 21β — meaning MMYT is approximately 114% more volatile than SPOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus -0. 5% for Sony Group Corporation (SONY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spotify Technology S. A. grew EPS 91. 1% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT?
Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 2. 0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPOT leads at 12. 8% versus 5. 9% for LYV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMYT leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sony Group Corporation (SONY) trades at 0.
1x forward P/E versus 69. 3x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 69. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 90. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT?
In this comparison, WMG (2.
2% yield), SONY (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. LYV, MMYT, SPOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WMG or SONY or LYV or MMYT or SPOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMG: +23. 0%, MMYT: +174. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMG and SONY and LYV and MMYT and SPOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (WMG (Communication Services) and SONY (Technology) and LYV (Communication Services) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and SPOT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SONY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WMG, SONY pay a dividend while LYV, MMYT, SPOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.