Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.25B | $10.58B | $18.34B | $16.69B | $42.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.99B | $1.62B | $5.26B | $10.17B | $33.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $471M | $118M | $783M | $1.34B | $3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 26.2% | 33.1% | 22.8% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 10.4% | 19.5% | 16.5% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 65.3x | 21.7x | 16.7x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.45B | $433M | $2.06B | $1.20B | $6.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $463M | $13K | $34M | $1.96B | $2.99B |
WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Drainage S… (WMS) | 100 | 324.9 | +224.9% |
| AAON, Inc. (AAON) | 100 | 357.9 | +257.9% |
| Lennox Internationa… (LII) | 100 | 246.4 | +146.4% |
| NVR, Inc. (NVR) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth -10.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 15.7% margin vs AAON's 7.3%
AAON has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs WMS's 5.5%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9%
- +35.5% vs NVR's -15.3%
Among these 5 stocks, LII doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 31.0%, current ratio 3.95x
- Beta 0.68 vs AAON's 1.83, lower leverage
- 22.3% ROA vs AAON's 7.4%, ROIC 43.8% vs 9.4%
DHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.1%
- PEG 1.09 vs AAON's 12.01
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 16.7x), PEG 1.09 vs 1.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 16.7x), PEG 1.09 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs AAON's 7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs AAON's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs LII's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.5% vs NVR's -15.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.3% ROA vs AAON's 7.4%, ROIC 43.8% vs 9.4% |
WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMS leads in 1 of 6 categories
DHI leads 1 • NVR leads 1 • AAON leads 1 • LII leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 20.6x AAON's $1.6B. WMS is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAON's 7.3%. On growth, AAON holds the edge at +54.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $1.6B | $5.3B | $10.2B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $869M | $228M | $1.1B | $1.7B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $471M | $118M | $783M | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $577M | -$145M | $661M | $1.1B | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +26.2% | +33.1% | +22.8% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +10.4% | +19.5% | +16.5% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +13.2% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | -9.0% | +12.6% | +10.8% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | +54.3% | +5.8% | -4.9% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.4% | +37.1% | -0.6% | -13.1% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DHI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, DHI trades at a 87% valuation discount to AAON's 100.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DHI offers better value at 1.01x vs AAON's 18.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.2B | $10.6B | $18.3B | $16.7B | $42.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.2B | $11.0B | $20.4B | $15.9B | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.01x | 100.19x | 23.71x | 13.76x | 12.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.71x | 65.28x | 21.71x | 16.67x | 13.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 18.43x | 1.23x | 1.01x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.74x | 48.81x | 18.18x | 8.90x | 10.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.22x | 7.34x | 3.53x | 1.62x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.89x | 12.00x | 15.90x | 4.77x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.23x | — | 28.70x | 15.22x | 12.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LII delivers a 72.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $72 in annual profit, vs $13 for DHI. DHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LII's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMS scores 6/9 vs AAON's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.2% | +13.4% | +72.0% | +34.3% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +7.4% | +20.1% | +22.3% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.7% | +9.4% | +29.8% | +43.8% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +12.4% | +40.2% | +32.9% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.48x | 1.77x | 0.31x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $982M | $433M | $2.0B | -$760M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $463M | $13,000 | $34M | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $433M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | 11.27x | 20.51x | 63.47x | 44.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAON leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAON five years ago would be worth $29,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,530 for NVR. Over the past 12 months, AAON leads with a +35.5% total return vs NVR's -15.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAON at 26.3% vs NVR's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +63.3% | +5.9% | -17.4% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.2% | +35.5% | -6.3% | -15.3% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.7% | +101.6% | +91.9% | +2.7% | +38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.2% | +196.3% | +57.8% | +15.3% | +46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +549.9% | +612.1% | +309.4% | +264.9% | +424.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +26.3% | +24.3% | +0.9% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AAON and NVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAON's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAON currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs NVR's 69.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.83x | 1.23x | 0.68x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $179.31 | $148.88 | $689.44 | $8618.28 | $184.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $104.69 | $62.00 | $434.06 | $5930.00 | $114.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +86.8% | +76.4% | +69.7% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 59.4 | 63.8 | 36.6 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 860K | 965K | 458K | 19K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LII and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMS as "Hold", AAON as "Buy", LII as "Hold", NVR as "Buy", DHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.7% upside for WMS (target: $203) vs -7.9% for AAON (target: $119). For income investors, DHI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs AAON's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $202.67 | $119.00 | $553.45 | $7465.33 | $163.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 5 | 30 | 24 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.3% | +0.9% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 12 | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $0.39 | $4.93 | — | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.3% | +2.7% | +11.0% | +10.1% |
WMS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DHI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WMS vs AAON vs LII vs NVR vs DHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AAON, Inc. (AAON) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI?
On trailing P/E, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus AAON, Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, D. R. Horton, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: D. R. Horton, Inc. wins at 1. 09x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI?
Over the past 5 years, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) delivered a total return of +196. 3%, compared to +15. 3% for NVR, Inc. (NVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAON returned +612. 1% versus NVR's +264. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus AAON, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning AAON is approximately 169% more volatile than NVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 177% for Lennox International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lennox International Inc. grew EPS -1. 4% year-over-year, compared to -36. 1% for AAON, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAON leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI?
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 7. 5% for AAON, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus 10. 1% for AAON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMS leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 65. 3x for AAON, Inc. — 51. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMS: 40. 7% to $202. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI?
In this comparison, DHI (1.
1% yield), LII (0. 9% yield), WMS (0. 4% yield), AAON (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WMS or AAON or LII or NVR or DHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). AAON, Inc. (AAON) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, AAON: +612. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMS and AAON and LII and NVR and DHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (WMS (Industrials) and AAON (Industrials) and LII (Industrials) and NVR (Consumer Cyclical) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. LII, DHI pay a dividend while WMS, AAON, NVR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.