Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WNEB vs CFFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
WNEB vs CFFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $285M | $252M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $130M | $186M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 69.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.3x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $106M | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $14M |
WNEB vs CFFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western New England… (WNEB) | 100 | 266.9 | +166.9% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNEB vs CFFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNEB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CFFI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CFFI's 2.4%
- +53.5% vs CFFI's +24.3%
CFFI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 37.9%
- 144.1% 10Y total return vs WNEB's 111.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% NII/revenue growth vs WNEB's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.3x), PEG 1.16 vs 1.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CFFI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs WNEB's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CFFI's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs CFFI's +24.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CFFI's 0.5% |
WNEB vs CFFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WNEB vs CFFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI and WNEB operate at a comparable scale, with $186M and $130M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.4% (CFFI) to 11.8% (WNEB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $130M | $186M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.0% | +69.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | +10.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 50% valuation discount to WNEB's 18.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CFFI offers better value at 1.45x vs WNEB's 1.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $285M | $252M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $353M | $354M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.79x | 9.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.28x | 7.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.75x | 1.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.67x | 10.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.65x | 11.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WNEB and CFFI each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFI delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for WNEB. WNEB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $116M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WNEB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,498 for WNEB. Over the past 12 months, WNEB leads with a +53.5% total return vs CFFI's +24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WNEB at 35.4% vs CFFI's 18.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.5% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.0% | +66.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.0% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.3% | +144.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.4% | +18.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WNEB and CFFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNEB's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.52 | $80.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.53 | $57.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 4K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WNEB and CFFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CFFI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs WNEB's 2.01%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.4% |
CFFI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WNEB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
WNEB vs CFFI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNEB or CFFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger pick with 11.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WNEB or CFFI?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 8x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: C&F Financial Corporation wins at 1. 16x versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 33x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WNEB or CFFI?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +85. 0% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFFI returned +144. 1% versus WNEB's +111. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WNEB or CFFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning WNEB is approximately 32% more volatile than CFFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WNEB or CFFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is pulling ahead at 11.
8% versus 5. 8% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C&F Financial Corporation grew EPS 37. 9% year-over-year, compared to 33. 9% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WNEB or CFFI?
C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus 11. 8% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CFFI leads at 17. 8% versus 14. 9% for WNEB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CFFI leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WNEB or CFFI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 33x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WNEB or CFFI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB).
09Is WNEB or CFFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 2. 4% yield, +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFI: +144. 1%, WNEB: +111. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WNEB and CFFI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WNEB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.