Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WNEB
Western New England Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$285M
5Y Perf.+166.9%
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$248M
5Y Perf.+177.5%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.2%
FXNC
First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$253M
5Y Perf.+110.5%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-66.0%

WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WNEB logoWNEB
FUNC logoFUNC
MNSB logoMNSB
FXNC logoFXNC
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$285M$248M$176M$253M$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$130M$112M$136M$112M$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$25M$16M$18M$382M
Gross Margin62.0%68.8%54.4%74.0%38.1%
Operating Margin14.9%24.4%14.0%19.6%17.5%
Forward P/E14.3x8.7x10.4x11.7x7.5x
Total Debt$106M$188M$70M$43M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$78M$25M$161M$599M

WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WNEB
FUNC
MNSB
FXNC
FIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Western New England… (WNEB)100266.9+166.9%
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100277.5+177.5%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.2+77.2%
First National Corp… (FXNC)100210.5+110.5%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10034.0-66.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FUNC and FIS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. WNEB, MNSB, and FXNC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WNEB
Western New England Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WNEB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +53.5% vs FIS's -35.3%
Best for: momentum
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Banking Pick

FUNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.

  • 289.2% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 241.1%
  • 18.4% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • 1.2% ROA vs WNEB's 0.6%, ROIC 5.9% vs 4.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 0.66 vs WNEB's 0.80, lower leverage
Best for: stability
FXNC
First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
  • Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
  • NIM 3.6% vs WNEB's 2.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.

  • PEG 0.31 vs FXNC's 7.87
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.31 vs 7.87
  • 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFXNC logoFXNC27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.31 vs 7.87
Quality / MarginsFUNC logoFUNC18.4% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyMNSB logoMNSBBeta 0.66 vs WNEB's 0.80, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)WNEB logoWNEB+53.5% vs FIS's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FUNC logoFUNC1.2% ROA vs WNEB's 0.6%, ROIC 5.9% vs 4.1%

WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WNEBWestern New England Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2024
Trust Department
51.3%$9M
Debit Card Income
22.9%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.5%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
8.2%$1M
Other Service Charges
5.0%$887,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
FXNCFirst National Corporation
FY 2018
Bank Servicing And Deposit Account
41.2%$3M
Credit And Debit Card
29.2%$2M
Financial Service, Wealth Management
21.8%$2M
Financial Service, Other
7.8%$601,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFUNCLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FUNC and FXNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 97.4x FUNC's $112M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricWNEB logoWNEBWestern New Engla…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$130M$112M$136M$112M$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$21M$36M$23M$25M$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$25M$16M$18M$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$18M$16M$13M$21M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.0%+68.8%+54.4%+74.0%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.9%+24.4%+14.0%+19.6%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.8%+18.4%+11.5%+15.8%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.2%+18.2%+7.8%+18.7%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+62.5%+20.2%+120.9%+7.1%+92.3%
Evenly matched — FUNC and FXNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FUNC and MNSB and FIS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWNEB logoWNEBWestern New Engla…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$285M$248M$176M$253M$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$353M$357M$221M$134M$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.79x12.12x13.36x14.27x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.28x8.68x10.45x11.75x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.75x1.08x9.55x2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.67x11.52x11.58x6.13x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.20x2.22x1.30x2.25x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.15x1.39x0.82x1.35x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.65x12.18x16.57x12.03x9.97x
Evenly matched — FUNC and MNSB and FIS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WNEB scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWNEB logoWNEBWestern New Engla…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+12.5%+7.3%+10.0%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.6%+1.2%+0.7%+0.9%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.1%+5.9%+5.0%+7.7%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.2%+8.5%+0.9%+9.9%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x1.05x0.32x0.23x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$68M$109M$45M-$118M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$78M$25M$161M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$106M$188M$70M$43M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.40x1.01x0.31x0.84x4.64x
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, WNEB leads with a +53.5% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWNEB logoWNEBWestern New Engla…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.7%+4.4%+19.4%+14.6%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+53.5%+27.8%+26.4%+46.9%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+148.0%+218.6%+21.5%+110.8%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+85.0%+134.5%+20.6%+68.7%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.3%+289.2%+126.9%+241.1%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.4%+47.1%+6.7%+28.2%-2.2%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WNEB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNEB's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WNEB currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWNEB logoWNEBWestern New Engla…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.80x0.72x0.66x0.70x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.52$41.95$25.17$29.85$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.53$28.00$17.86$18.31$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.0%+91.0%+93.4%+93.7%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.450.650.447.643.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded64K11K58K80K5.5M
Evenly matched — WNEB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FXNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WNEB as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs WNEB's 2.01%.

MetricWNEB logoWNEBWestern New Engla…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.50$25.00$21.00$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts811137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+2.2%+2.2%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises472111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.28$0.82$0.61$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.1%+1.6%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — FXNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FXNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallFirst United Corporation (FUNC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WNEB vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FXNC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS?

On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.

5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning WNEB is approximately 21% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.

1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS?

First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS?

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), WNEB (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WNEB or FUNC or MNSB or FXNC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 2% yield, +289. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +289. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WNEB and FUNC and MNSB and FXNC and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (WNEB (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WNEB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. WNEB, FUNC, FXNC, FIS pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WNEB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUNC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FXNC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WNEB and FUNC and MNSB and FXNC and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WNEB: 5.8% · FUNC: 16.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(WNEB: 11.8% · FUNC: 18.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WNEB: 18.8x · FUNC: 12.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.