Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Education & Training Services
WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $790K | $589M | $4.83B | $760M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $164M | $907M | $5.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $137M | $-1.31B | $-374M |
| Gross Margin | 10.6% | 61.9% | -47.7% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | -285.5% | 16.8% | -90.6% | -9.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $41K | $14M | $3.65B | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $95M | $547M | $1.32B |
WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth -109.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 15.81x
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 15.81x
- 43.7% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 17.3% margin vs WNW's -186.1%
- 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- 19.0% ROA vs WNW's -28.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -57.7%
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -51.6% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
- -4.7% vs WNW's -98.2%
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 0.99
- Beta 0.99 vs BTBT's 3.37
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs WNW's -186.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.7% vs WNW's -98.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs WNW's -28.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -57.7% |
WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
WNW leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • GOTU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 807.6x WNW's $7M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNW's -186.1%. On growth, WNW holds the edge at +62.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $164M | $907M | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $166M | $627M | -$378M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $137M | -$1.3B | -$374M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$448M | -$312M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +61.9% | -47.7% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +16.8% | -90.6% | -9.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -186.1% | +17.3% | -144.6% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.4% | -65.3% | -34.4% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.6% | — | — | +32.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.2% | +2.8% | -4.8% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
WNW leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $790,078 | $589M | $4.8B | $760M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$17M | $508M | $7.9B | $638M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 9.15x | -3.44x | -4.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.49x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 3.60x | 5.32x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 0.56x | 1.30x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.09x | — | — | 64.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-31 for WNW. WNW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.7% | +21.4% | -30.5% | -21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.1% | +19.0% | -17.1% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | +6.5% | -9.0% | -47.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +8.5% | -12.1% | -39.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 1.05x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$81M | $3.1B | -$829M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $95M | $547M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41,235 | $14M | $3.6B | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WNW. Over the past 12 months, MARA leads with a -4.7% total return vs WNW's -98.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs WNW's -93.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | -10.3% | +28.2% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.2% | -9.0% | -4.7% | -39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -19.7% | +36.1% | -32.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -84.6% | -59.5% | -92.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -60.4% | -51.6% | -81.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.4% | -7.1% | +10.8% | -12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MARA and GOTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs WNW's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 3.37x | 3.11x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1352.00 | $4.55 | $23.45 | $4.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $1.25 | $6.66 | $1.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +40.2% | +54.2% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.3 | 69.1 | 69.6 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 898K | 18.5M | 47.6M | 395K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", GOTU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $16.13 | $2.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +4.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WNW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WNW vs BTBT vs MARA vs GOTU: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is the stronger pick with 43.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -51. 6% versus WNW's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 241% more volatile than GOTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is pulling ahead at 43.
7% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOTU leads at -10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -262. 5% for Meiwu Technology Company Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -263. 0% for WNW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. WNW, MARA, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WNW or BTBT or MARA or GOTU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOTU: -81. 2%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WNW and BTBT and MARA and GOTU?
These companies operate in different sectors (WNW (Consumer Cyclical) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.