Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Education & Training Services
Waste Management
WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Construction Materials | Education & Training Services | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $790K | $356K | $760M | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $9M | $5.85B | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-25M | $-374M | $-18M |
| Gross Margin | 10.6% | 14.0% | 67.5% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | -285.5% | -237.8% | -9.1% | -26.3% |
| Total Debt | $41K | $110K | $492M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $671K | $1.32B | $12M |
WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 187.1 | +87.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth -109.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 15.81x
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 15.81x
- 43.7% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- beta 0.99
- -6.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
- Beta 0.99 vs PESI's 1.85
- -6.8% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC -47.8% vs -14.5%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs GOTU's -81.2%
- +26.2% vs WNW's -98.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.2% vs WNW's -98.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.8% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC -47.8% vs -14.5% |
WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOTU leads in 1 of 6 categories
WNW leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • RETO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 807.6x WNW's $7M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.4% (GOTU) to -2.9% (RETO). On growth, WNW holds the edge at +62.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $9M | $5.8B | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$19M | -$378M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$25M | -$374M | -$18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$7M | $0 | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +14.0% | +67.5% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -2.4% | -9.1% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -186.1% | -2.9% | -6.4% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.4% | -77.8% | +1.7% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.6% | +49.0% | +32.9% | -20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.2% | +98.8% | +66.7% | -110.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WNW leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $790,078 | $355,799 | $760M | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$17M | -$205,956 | $638M | $200M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -0.04x | -4.86x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.19x | 1.12x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 0.01x | 2.67x | 4.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.09x | — | 64.81x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RETO and GOTU each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOTU delivers a -21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-22 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. WNW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOTU's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RETO scores 5/9 vs GOTU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.7% | -183.4% | -21.8% | -34.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.1% | -75.1% | -6.8% | -20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -14.5% | -47.8% | -21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | -21.6% | -39.9% | -16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.25x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$561,755 | -$829M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $671,355 | $1.3B | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41,235 | $109,600 | $492M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -31.78x | — | -42.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WNW. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +26.2% total return vs WNW's -98.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs WNW's -93.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | -66.1% | -19.3% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.2% | -95.9% | -39.4% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% | -32.3% | +21.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -92.4% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -81.2% | +178.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.4% | -92.0% | -12.2% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOTU and PESI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PESI currently trades 67.7% from its 52-week high vs WNW's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.77x | 0.99x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1352.00 | $19.55 | $4.56 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $0.48 | $1.84 | $8.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +3.3% | +43.2% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.3 | 43.5 | 52.7 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 898K | 920K | 395K | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", PESI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 49.2% for GOTU (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $2.94 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
GOTU leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WNW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WNW vs RETO vs GOTU vs PESI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is the stronger pick with 43.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Analysts rate Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus WNW's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 87% more volatile than GOTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is pulling ahead at 43.
7% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PESI leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI?
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) is the more profitable company, earning -22. 3% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps -22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PESI leads at -19. 0% versus -263. 0% for WNW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is WNW or RETO or GOTU or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99)). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOTU: -81. 2%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WNW and RETO and GOTU and PESI?
These companies operate in different sectors (WNW (Consumer Cyclical) and RETO (Basic Materials) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.