Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WS vs CAT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WS
Worthington Steel, Inc.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.08B
5Y Perf.+52.3%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$431.16B
5Y Perf.+269.6%

WS vs CAT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WS logoWS
CAT logoCAT
IndustrySteelAgricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$2.08B$431.16B
Revenue (TTM)$3.27B$70.75B
Net Income (TTM)$125M$9.42B
Gross Margin12.8%32.5%
Operating Margin4.8%16.6%
Forward P/E19.5x40.1x
Total Debt$228M$43.33B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$9.98B

WS vs CATLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WS
CAT
StockNov 23May 26Return
Worthington Steel, … (WS)100152.3+52.3%
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)100369.6+269.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WS vs CAT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CAT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Worthington Steel, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WS
Worthington Steel, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

WS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.92, Low D/E 19.0%, current ratio 1.66x
  • Beta 1.92, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.66x
  • Lower P/E (19.5x vs 40.1x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Income Pick

CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 0.6%
  • Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
  • 12.2% 10Y total return vs WS's 73.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCAT logoCAT4.3% revenue growth vs WS's -9.8%
ValueWS logoWSLower P/E (19.5x vs 40.1x)
Quality / MarginsCAT logoCAT13.3% margin vs WS's 3.8%
Stability / SafetyCAT logoCATBeta 1.54 vs WS's 1.92
DividendsWS logoWS1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CAT's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)CAT logoCAT+190.7% vs WS's +62.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CAT logoCAT10.0% ROA vs WS's 5.8%, ROIC 15.9% vs 8.2%

WS vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WSWorthington Steel, Inc.
FY 2025
Steel Processing
100.0%$2.9B
CATCaterpillar Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Subsegments
66.6%$74.0B
Construction Industries
22.6%$25.1B
Resource Industries
11.2%$12.5B
Financial Products
3.8%$4.2B
Other Segments
0.3%$327M
Power & Energy
-4.6%$-5,058,000,000

WS vs CAT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCATLAGGINGWS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 21.7x WS's $3.3B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WS's 3.8%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWS logoWSWorthington Steel…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.3B$70.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$231M$14.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$125M$9.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$127M$11.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.8%+32.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.8%+16.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.8%+13.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.9%+16.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.0%+22.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+48.0%+30.2%
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.1x trailing earnings, WS trades at a 61% valuation discount to CAT's 49.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WS's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAT's 34.5x.

MetricWS logoWSWorthington Steel…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.1B$431.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.3B$464.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.12x49.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.48x40.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.63x34.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.67x6.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.73x20.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.77x41.97x
WS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $9 for WS. WS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WS scores 6/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWS logoWSWorthington Steel…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.3%+47.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.8%+10.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.2%+15.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.4%+19.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x2.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$190M$33.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$10.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$228M$43.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense22.24x9.22x
WS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $40,189 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,328 for WS. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +190.7% total return vs WS's +62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 63.8% vs WS's 20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWS logoWSWorthington Steel…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.6%+55.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+62.0%+190.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.3%+339.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.3%+301.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.3%+1223.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.1%+63.8%
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WS's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs WS's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWS logoWSWorthington Steel…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.92x1.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$49.17$930.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.23$318.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.2%+99.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.773.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded299K2.4M
CAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WS and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates WS as "Buy" and CAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -9.3% upside for WS (target: $38) vs -11.0% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, WS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.54% vs CAT's 0.63%.

MetricWS logoWSWorthington Steel…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.00$824.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts153
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises28
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64$5.86
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+1.2%
Evenly matched — WS and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallCaterpillar Inc. (CAT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WS vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WS or CAT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 8% for Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WS or CAT?

On trailing P/E, Worthington Steel, Inc.

(WS) is the cheapest at 19. 1x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 49. 2x. On forward P/E, Worthington Steel, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WS or CAT?

Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) delivered a total return of +301. 9%, compared to +73. 3% for Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1223% versus WS's +73. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WS or CAT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus Worthington Steel, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning WS is approximately 25% more volatile than CAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WS or CAT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -9. 8% for Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Caterpillar Inc. grew EPS -14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WS or CAT?

Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Worthington Steel, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAT leads at 16. 6% versus 4. 8% for WS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAT leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WS or CAT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Worthington Steel, Inc.

(WS) trades at 19. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 1x for Caterpillar Inc. — 20. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WS: -9. 3% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WS or CAT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).

09

Is WS or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +1223% 10Y return). Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1223%, WS: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WS and CAT?

These companies operate in different sectors (WS (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WS and CAT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WS: 18.0% · CAT: 22.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(WS: 3.8% · CAT: 13.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WS: 19.1x · CAT: 49.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.