Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $408M | $115M | $2.35B | $203M | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198M | $58M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $11M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 60.3% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 23.6% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 11.3x | 10.9x | 11.8x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $106M | $49M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $7M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Bancorporation… (WTBA) | 100 | 136.6 | +36.6% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.4 | +142.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 155.7 | +55.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WTBA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 17.1x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.1% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5%
MGYR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 26.8%
- PEG 0.35 vs TRST's 4.72
- NIM 3.2% vs WTBA's 2.1%
- 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs MGYR's 125.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
TRST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs WTBA's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGYR leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • WTBA leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 14.8x MGYR's $58M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198M | $58M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $16M | $241M | $9M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $11M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $11M | $225M | $11M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +60.3% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +23.6% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +16.7% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +16.8% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.6% | +51.5% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MGYR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, MGYR trades at a 24% valuation discount to TRST's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $408M | $115M | $2.4B | $203M | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $490M | $156M | $2.5B | $136M | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.56x | 11.33x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.30x | — | 10.94x | 11.76x | 17.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.82x | 10.61x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 1.96x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 0.93x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.46x | 11.67x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTBA delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGYR's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGYR scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +9.2% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +6.7% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +2.4% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.41x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $81M | $42M | $142M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $7M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $49M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.66x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGYR five years ago would be worth $17,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,704 for WTBA. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | +1.9% | +9.3% | +21.5% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.7% | +25.7% | +9.0% | +45.6% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.4% | +85.6% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +73.1% | +29.9% | +71.2% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +125.8% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +22.9% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGYR and TRST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTBA's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs MGYR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.26x | 0.88x | 0.45x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.60 | $20.00 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.31 | $14.35 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +88.4% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 47.4 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 6K | 236K | 40K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WTBA and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WTBA as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". For income investors, WTBA offers the higher dividend yield at 4.12% vs MGYR's 1.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +1.7% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $0.29 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.7% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +4.4% |
MGYR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NBTB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, West Bancorporation, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) delivered a total return of +73. 1%, compared to +7. 0% for West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +161. 7% versus WTBA's +84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus West Bancorporation, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning WTBA is approximately 249% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 41% for Magyar Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: West Bancorporation, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 7% for Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR).
09Is WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 1. 7% yield, +125. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 7%, WTBA: +84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WTBA and MGYR and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.