Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $3M | $375M | $771M | $8.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $5.89B | $2.66B | $4.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $963K | $107M | $171M | $367M |
| Gross Margin | 18.6% | 44.3% | 54.4% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 3.7% | 2.7% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 3.7x | 8.3x | 18.1x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $1.82B | $333M | $804M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $809K | $440M | $1.77B | $1.61B |
WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WF International Li… (WXM) | 100 | 26.4 | -73.6% |
| Youdao, Inc. (DAO) | 100 | 135.0 | +35.0% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WXM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and efficiency.
- Lower P/E (3.7x vs 16.2x)
- 9.1% ROA vs TAL's 3.1%, ROIC 18.4% vs -0.3%
DAO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.78 vs WXM's 1.41
- +35.6% vs WXM's -76.1%
TAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 8.9%, current ratio 2.86x
- 51.2% revenue growth vs WXM's 1.4%
EDU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 1.1%
- 47.3% 10Y total return vs DAO's -4.0%
- Beta 0.82, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.58x
- 7.4% margin vs DAO's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.2% revenue growth vs WXM's 1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.7x vs 16.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs DAO's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs WXM's 1.41 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs WXM's -76.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs TAL's 3.1%, ROIC 18.4% vs -0.3% |
WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EDU leads in 2 of 6 categories
DAO leads 2 • TAL leads 1 • WXM leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EDU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 379.6x WXM's $16M. EDU is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAO's 1.8%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $5.9B | $2.7B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $193M | $72M | $563M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $107M | $171M | $367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 | $441M | $737M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +44.3% | +54.4% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +3.7% | +2.7% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +1.8% | +6.5% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | — | +16.6% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.5% | +15.0% | +38.7% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -100.0% | -21.4% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, WXM trades at a 85% valuation discount to EDU's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WXM's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DAO's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $375M | $771M | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $579M | -$667M | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.65x | — | 9.05x | 24.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.25x | 18.12x | 16.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.01x | 15.74x | -16.38x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.43x | 0.34x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | — | 0.20x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.19x | — | 2.70x | 14.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WXM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WXM delivers a 25.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $5 for TAL. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WXM's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs TAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.9% | — | +4.7% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.1% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.4% | — | -0.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +34.1% | — | -0.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | — | 0.09x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $1.4B | -$1.6B | -$809M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $808,915 | $440M | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $1.8B | $333M | $804M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.43x | 3.90x | — | 1570.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAO five years ago would be worth $5,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,107 for WXM. Over the past 12 months, DAO leads with a +35.6% total return vs WXM's -76.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 26.7% vs WXM's -52.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.7% | +7.0% | -0.8% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -76.1% | +35.6% | +23.9% | +19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | +79.1% | +103.2% | +37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -47.5% | -79.7% | -61.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -4.0% | +27.3% | +47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.0% | +21.4% | +26.7% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
DAO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WXM's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAO currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs WXM's 11.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.41x | 0.78x | 0.96x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.22 | $12.96 | $13.37 | $64.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $8.00 | $9.04 | $41.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.3% | +92.6% | +85.3% | +86.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 62.3 | 52.3 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 66K | 3.3M | 689K |
Analyst Outlook
EDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAO as "Buy", TAL as "Hold", EDU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for TAL (target: $18) vs -45.8% for DAO (target: $7). EDU is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 | $18.00 | $68.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 28 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +5.0% |
EDU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). DAO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
WXM vs DAO vs TAL vs EDU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger pick with 51.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for WF International Limited Ordinary Shares (WXM). WF International Limited Ordinary Shares (WXM) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Youdao, Inc. (DAO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU?
On trailing P/E, WF International Limited Ordinary Shares (WXM) is the cheapest at 3.
7x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Youdao, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU?
Over the past 5 years, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) delivered a total return of -47. 5%, compared to -88. 9% for WF International Limited Ordinary Shares (WXM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDU returned +47. 3% versus WXM's -88. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus WF International Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 41β — meaning WXM is approximately 81% more volatile than DAO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 58% for WF International Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAL Education Group (TAL) is pulling ahead at 51.
2% versus 1. 4% for WF International Limited Ordinary Shares (WXM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Youdao, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU?
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus 1. 8% for Youdao, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WXM leads at 9. 0% versus -0. 3% for TAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDU leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU?
In this comparison, EDU (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. WXM, DAO, TAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WXM or DAO or TAL or EDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDU: +47. 3%, WXM: -88. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WXM and DAO and TAL and EDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (WXM (Industrials) and DAO (Consumer Defensive) and TAL (Consumer Defensive) and EDU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WXM is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EDU pays a dividend while WXM, DAO, TAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.