REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Construction
Home Improvement
Chemicals - Specialty
WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Home Improvement | Construction | Home Improvement | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $17.09B | $313.33B | $14.21B | $126.13B | $77.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.92B | $164.68B | $7.68B | $86.29B | $23.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $397M | $14.16B | $837M | $6.65B | $2.60B |
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 33.3% | 35.4% | 33.5% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 12.7% | 16.8% | 11.8% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 83.6x | 21.0x | 16.5x | 17.9x | 26.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $19.01B | $3.44B | $7.19B | $14.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $1.39B | $647M | $982M | $207M |
WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 150.9 | +50.9% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 157.8 | +57.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 0.51, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 0.51 vs MAS's 1.28, lower leverage
HD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 3.2% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 26.6x), PEG 3.33 vs 3.85
- 10.9% margin vs WY's 5.7%
- +16.0% vs SHW's -12.3%
- 15.9% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs 2.4%
LOW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 240.6% 10Y total return vs SHW's 245.5%
- PEG 2.02 vs HD's 5.87
Among these 5 stocks, SHW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 26.6x), PEG 3.33 vs 3.85 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs WY's 5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs MAS's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, vs SHW's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.0% vs SHW's -12.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs 2.4% |
WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHW leads 1 • WY leads 0 • HD leads 0 • LOW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 23.8x WY's $6.9B. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WY's 5.7%. On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $164.7B | $7.7B | $86.3B | $23.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $24.2B | $1.4B | $12.3B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $397M | $14.2B | $837M | $6.7B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $516M | $12.6B | $943M | $7.7B | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +33.3% | +35.4% | +33.5% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +12.7% | +16.8% | +11.8% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +8.6% | +10.9% | +7.7% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +7.7% | +12.3% | +8.9% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -3.8% | +6.5% | +10.9% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -14.6% | +20.7% | -11.0% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MAS and LOW each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, MAS trades at a 65% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LOW offers better value at 2.14x vs HD's 6.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.1B | $313.3B | $14.2B | $126.1B | $77.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.2B | $330.9B | $17.0B | $132.3B | $91.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.67x | 22.15x | 18.24x | 19.01x | 30.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 83.63x | 20.98x | 16.50x | 17.89x | 26.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.20x | 3.68x | 2.14x | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.79x | 13.70x | 11.97x | 10.94x | 20.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 1.90x | 1.88x | 1.46x | 3.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 24.53x | 197.16x | — | 16.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 194.19x | 24.78x | 16.40x | 16.49x | 29.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. WY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAS scores 6/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +110.5% | +8.0% | — | +58.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +13.5% | +15.9% | +12.3% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +32.1% | +35.4% | +76.2% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +29.8% | +35.9% | +33.6% | +21.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.48x | 45.81x | — | 3.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | $17.6B | $2.8B | $6.2B | $14.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $1.4B | $647M | $982M | $207M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $19.0B | $3.4B | $7.2B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.95x | 8.71x | 12.60x | 8.90x | 7.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $12,322 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for WY. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +16.0% total return vs SHW's -12.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHW at 11.6% vs WY's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | -8.2% | +9.7% | -7.8% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | -10.3% | +16.0% | +2.2% | -12.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | +18.1% | +38.4% | +16.1% | +39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.8% | +7.4% | +16.1% | +23.2% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | +181.8% | +153.1% | +240.6% | +245.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +5.7% | +11.4% | +5.1% | +11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WY and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAS's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs HD's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.84x | 1.28x | 0.86x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.86 | $426.75 | $79.19 | $293.06 | $379.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.16 | $310.42 | $58.16 | $210.33 | $301.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +73.9% | +88.9% | +76.9% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 33.8 | 51.6 | 34.3 | 35.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 3.6M | 2.7M | 2.3M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WY and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WY as "Buy", HD as "Buy", MAS as "Buy", LOW as "Buy", SHW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.5% upside for HD (target: $408) vs 17.0% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs SHW's 1.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.83 | $408.08 | $82.36 | $288.25 | $389.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 62 | 38 | 51 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.9% | +1.8% | +2.1% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 12 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $9.18 | $1.24 | $4.71 | $3.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?
On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.
2x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Masco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 02x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +245. 5% versus WY's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Masco Corporation's 1. 28β — meaning MAS is approximately 150% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masco Corporation grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -16. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHW leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus 4. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 6. 7% for WY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 02x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Masco Corporation (MAS) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 67. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 29. 5% to $408. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).
09Is WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +14. 4%, MAS: +153. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WY and HD and MAS and LOW and SHW?
These companies operate in different sectors (WY (Real Estate) and HD (Consumer Cyclical) and MAS (Industrials) and LOW (Consumer Cyclical) and SHW (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LOW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.