Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company

REIT - Specialty

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.09B
5Y Perf.+17.4%
HD
The Home Depot, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$313.33B
5Y Perf.+26.9%
MAS
Masco Corporation

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$14.21B
5Y Perf.+50.9%
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$126.13B
5Y Perf.+72.8%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$77.06B
5Y Perf.+57.8%

WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WY logoWY
HD logoHD
MAS logoMAS
LOW logoLOW
SHW logoSHW
IndustryREIT - SpecialtyHome ImprovementConstructionHome ImprovementChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$17.09B$313.33B$14.21B$126.13B$77.06B
Revenue (TTM)$6.92B$164.68B$7.68B$86.29B$23.94B
Net Income (TTM)$397M$14.16B$837M$6.65B$2.60B
Gross Margin13.4%33.3%35.4%33.5%49.1%
Operating Margin7.7%12.7%16.8%11.8%16.1%
Forward P/E83.6x21.0x16.5x17.9x26.6x
Total Debt$5.57B$19.01B$3.44B$7.19B$14.53B
Cash & Equiv.$464M$1.39B$647M$982M$207M

WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WY
HD
MAS
LOW
SHW
StockMay 20May 26Return
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)100117.4+17.4%
The Home Depot, Inc. (HD)100126.9+26.9%
Masco Corporation (MAS)100150.9+50.9%
Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW)100172.8+72.8%
The Sherwin-William… (SHW)100157.8+57.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MAS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Weyerhaeuser Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. HD also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
The Real Estate Income Play

WY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 3.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 0.51, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 0.51 vs MAS's 1.28, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HD
The Home Depot, Inc.
The Growth Play

HD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
  • 3.2% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure
MAS
Masco Corporation
The Value Play

MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (16.5x vs 26.6x), PEG 3.33 vs 3.85
  • 10.9% margin vs WY's 5.7%
  • +16.0% vs SHW's -12.3%
  • 15.9% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs 2.4%
Best for: value and quality
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LOW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 240.6% 10Y total return vs SHW's 245.5%
  • PEG 2.02 vs HD's 5.87
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SHW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHD logoHD3.2% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
ValueMAS logoMASLower P/E (16.5x vs 26.6x), PEG 3.33 vs 3.85
Quality / MarginsMAS logoMAS10.9% margin vs WY's 5.7%
Stability / SafetyWY logoWYBeta 0.51 vs MAS's 1.28, lower leverage
DividendsWY logoWY3.5% yield, vs SHW's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)MAS logoMAS+16.0% vs SHW's -12.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MAS logoMAS15.9% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs 2.4%

WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WYWeyerhaeuser Company
FY 2025
Wood Products
66.1%$5.0B
Timberlands
27.8%$2.1B
R E E N R
6.1%$454M
HDThe Home Depot, Inc.
FY 2024
Major Product Line - Building Materials
33.1%$52.8B
Major Product Line, Décor
32.5%$51.8B
Major Product Line - Hardlines
30.4%$48.6B
Other Segment
4.0%$6.4B
MASMasco Corporation
FY 2025
Plumbing Products
66.0%$5.0B
Decorative Architectural Products
34.0%$2.6B
LOWLowe's Companies, Inc.
FY 2024
Home Decor
36.9%$30.9B
Building Products
31.5%$26.4B
Hardlines
29.0%$24.3B
Other Sales
2.6%$2.2B
SHWThe Sherwin-Williams Company
FY 2025
Paint Stores Group
57.7%$13.6B
Consumer Group
36.3%$8.6B
Global Finishes Group
28.9%$6.8B
Corporate And Eliminations
-22.9%$-5,408,000,000

WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMASLAGGINGLOW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 23.8x WY's $6.9B. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WY's 5.7%. On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…HD logoHDThe Home Depot, I…MAS logoMASMasco CorporationLOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…SHW logoSHWThe Sherwin-Willi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.9B$164.7B$7.7B$86.3B$23.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.0B$24.2B$1.4B$12.3B$4.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$397M$14.2B$837M$6.7B$2.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$516M$12.6B$943M$7.7B$2.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.4%+33.3%+35.4%+33.5%+49.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.7%+12.7%+16.8%+11.8%+16.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.7%+8.6%+10.9%+7.7%+10.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.5%+7.7%+12.3%+8.9%+12.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%-3.8%+6.5%+10.9%+6.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-14.6%+20.7%-11.0%+7.5%
MAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MAS and LOW each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 18.2x trailing earnings, MAS trades at a 65% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LOW offers better value at 2.14x vs HD's 6.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…HD logoHDThe Home Depot, I…MAS logoMASMasco CorporationLOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…SHW logoSHWThe Sherwin-Willi…
Market CapShares × price$17.1B$313.3B$14.2B$126.1B$77.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.2B$330.9B$17.0B$132.3B$91.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS52.67x22.15x18.24x19.01x30.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.83.63x20.98x16.50x17.89x26.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.20x3.68x2.14x4.40x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.79x13.70x11.97x10.94x20.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x1.90x1.88x1.46x3.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.81x24.53x197.16x16.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF194.19x24.78x16.40x16.49x29.04x
Evenly matched — MAS and LOW each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MAS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. WY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAS scores 6/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…HD logoHDThe Home Depot, I…MAS logoMASMasco CorporationLOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…SHW logoSHWThe Sherwin-Willi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.2%+110.5%+8.0%+58.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.4%+13.5%+15.9%+12.3%+10.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+32.1%+35.4%+76.2%+16.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.0%+29.8%+35.9%+33.6%+21.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.59x1.48x45.81x3.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.1B$17.6B$2.8B$6.2B$14.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$464M$1.4B$647M$982M$207M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$19.0B$3.4B$7.2B$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.95x8.71x12.60x8.90x7.83x
MAS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $12,322 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for WY. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +16.0% total return vs SHW's -12.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHW at 11.6% vs WY's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…HD logoHDThe Home Depot, I…MAS logoMASMasco CorporationLOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…SHW logoSHWThe Sherwin-Willi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.5%-8.2%+9.7%-7.8%-4.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.0%-10.3%+16.0%+2.2%-12.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.5%+18.1%+38.4%+16.1%+39.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.8%+7.4%+16.1%+23.2%+15.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.4%+181.8%+153.1%+240.6%+245.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.0%+5.7%+11.4%+5.1%+11.6%
SHW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WY and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAS's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs HD's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…HD logoHDThe Home Depot, I…MAS logoMASMasco CorporationLOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…SHW logoSHWThe Sherwin-Willi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.51x0.84x1.28x0.86x0.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.86$426.75$79.19$293.06$379.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.16$310.42$58.16$210.33$301.58
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.1%+73.9%+88.9%+76.9%+82.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.433.851.634.335.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.1M3.6M2.7M2.3M1.5M
Evenly matched — WY and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WY and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WY as "Buy", HD as "Buy", MAS as "Buy", LOW as "Buy", SHW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.5% upside for HD (target: $408) vs 17.0% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs SHW's 1.02%.

MetricWY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…HD logoHDThe Home Depot, I…MAS logoMASMasco CorporationLOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…SHW logoSHWThe Sherwin-Willi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.83$408.08$82.36$288.25$389.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts2562385138
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.5%+2.9%+1.8%+2.1%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises016121637
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84$9.18$1.24$4.71$3.17
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.9%0.0%+4.0%+0.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — WY and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallMasco Corporation (MAS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WY vs HD vs MAS vs LOW vs SHW: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?

On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.

2x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Masco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 02x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?

Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.

(LOW) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +245. 5% versus WY's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Masco Corporation's 1. 28β — meaning MAS is approximately 150% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masco Corporation grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -16. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHW leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?

The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

9% net margin versus 4. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 6. 7% for WY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 02x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Masco Corporation (MAS) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 67. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 29. 5% to $408. 08.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).

09

Is WY or HD or MAS or LOW or SHW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +14. 4%, MAS: +153. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WY and HD and MAS and LOW and SHW?

These companies operate in different sectors (WY (Real Estate) and HD (Consumer Cyclical) and MAS (Industrials) and LOW (Consumer Cyclical) and SHW (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LOW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WY

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHW

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WY and HD and MAS and LOW and SHW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WY: -2.0% · HD: -3.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(WY: 5.7% · HD: 8.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WY: 52.7x · HD: 22.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.