Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XCH
XCHG Limited American Depositary Share

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$54M
5Y Perf.-91.2%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$580M
5Y Perf.-48.7%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.92B
5Y Perf.-20.2%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.13B
5Y Perf.+224.7%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.63B
5Y Perf.+52.0%

XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XCH logoXCH
BTBT logoBTBT
MARA logoMARA
RIOT logoRIOT
CLSK logoCLSK
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - Application
Market Cap$54M$580M$4.92B$9.13B$3.63B
Revenue (TTM)$42M$164M$907M$647M$785M
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$137M$-1.31B$-867M$-261M
Gross Margin47.6%61.9%-47.7%-15.6%41.4%
Operating Margin-13.8%16.8%-90.6%-61.8%-26.4%
Forward P/E9.0x12.7x
Total Debt$10M$14M$3.65B$280M$824M
Cash & Equiv.$27M$95M$547M$234M$43M

XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XCH
BTBT
MARA
RIOT
CLSK
StockSep 24May 26Return
XCHG Limited Americ… (XCH)1008.8-91.2%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10051.3-48.7%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10079.8-20.2%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100324.7+224.7%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100152.0+52.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. XCHG Limited American Depositary Share is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. RIOT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XCH
XCHG Limited American Depositary Share
The Defensive Pick

XCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 35.2%, current ratio 2.08x
  • Beta 0.57 vs RIOT's 3.92
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 3.41, yield 0.3%
  • Beta 3.41, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs XCH's 9.6%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -50.7%
  • +185.4% vs XCH's -29.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs XCH's 9.6%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTLower P/E (9.0x vs 12.7x)
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyXCH logoXCHBeta 0.57 vs RIOT's 3.92
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield, vs CLSK's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RIOT logoRIOT+185.4% vs XCH's -29.1%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs RIOT's -21.5%, ROIC 6.5% vs -8.7%

XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XCHXCHG Limited American Depositary Share
FY 2024
Product
98.3%$42M
Service
1.7%$697,040
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M

XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGCLSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 21.5x XCH's $42M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42M$164M$907M$647M$785M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$166M$627M-$450M$181M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M$137M-$1.3B-$867M-$261M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$448M-$312M-$1.0B-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.6%+61.9%-47.7%-15.6%+41.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.8%+16.8%-90.6%-61.8%-26.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.9%+17.3%-144.6%-102.4%-33.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-16.3%-65.3%-34.4%-119.6%-133.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%-4.8%-60.0%-2.6%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — XCH and BTBT and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 9.0x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 29% valuation discount to CLSK's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.3x.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$54M$580M$4.9B$9.1B$3.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$37M$498M$8.0B$9.2B$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.50x9.00x-3.51x-12.35x12.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.32x6.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.27x3.54x5.42x14.11x4.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.81x0.55x1.32x2.87x2.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — XCH and BTBT and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-40 for XCH. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-40.5%+21.4%-30.5%-28.8%-13.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.6%+19.0%-17.1%-21.5%-8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%-9.0%-8.7%+10.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-58.4%+8.5%-12.1%-11.0%+13.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956335
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.03x1.05x0.10x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$16M-$81M$3.1B$46M$781M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$95M$547M$234M$43M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$14M$3.6B$280M$824M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.35x4.73x-16.47x-18.49x
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLSK five years ago would be worth $8,823 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,223 for XCH. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +185.4% total return vs XCH's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 49.6% vs XCH's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.6%-11.8%+30.6%+70.1%+22.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-29.1%-13.5%-9.4%+185.4%+63.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-21.1%+38.7%+129.6%+234.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-82.8%-53.5%-19.6%-11.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-61.0%-50.7%+786.6%-84.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.4%-7.6%+11.5%+31.9%+49.6%
Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XCH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XCH is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs XCH's 36.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x3.41x3.10x3.92x3.41x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.50$4.55$23.45$24.47$23.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.55$1.25$6.66$7.93$8.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.0%+39.6%+55.2%+98.4%+60.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.262.265.775.366.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded38K18.6M47.5M18.5M18.9M
Evenly matched — XCH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BTBT and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 177.8% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 13.8% for RIOT (target: $27). For income investors, BTBT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.31% vs CLSK's 0.24%.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$16.13$27.42$19.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts2191810
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises022
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.0%+0.0%+4.0%
Evenly matched — BTBT and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XCH vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 6% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus CleanSpark, Inc. at 12. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) delivered a total return of -11. 8%, compared to -87. 8% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +786. 6% versus XCH's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

57β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 92β — meaning RIOT is approximately 589% more volatile than XCH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 9. 6% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. XCH, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is XCH or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

57)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XCH: -87. 8%, CLSK: -84. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between XCH and BTBT and MARA and RIOT and CLSK?

These companies operate in different sectors (XCH (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XCH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XCH and BTBT and MARA and RIOT and CLSK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XCH: 9.6% · BTBT: 264.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.