Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
Apparel - Retail
Oil & Gas Midstream
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Apparel - Retail | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $12M | $2M | $3.36B | $2.82B | $4.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $6M | $1.29B | $5.50B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-5M | $277M | $192M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | -0.7% | 47.2% | 33.0% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | -208.4% | -32.2% | 26.6% | 6.0% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 6.6x | 12.1x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $16M | $1.23B | $1.73B | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $946K | $272M | $239M | $752M |
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Icon Energy Corp. (ICON) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 75.5 | -24.5% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 110.4 | +10.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XELB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ICON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 18.6% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5%
TRMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.0%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs STNG's 62.8%
- 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, AEO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- PEG 0.26 vs TRMD's 0.29
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs XELB's -437.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.3% vs ICON's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs XELB's -53.8%, ROIC 7.2% vs -33.6% |
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STNG leads in 4 of 6 categories
XELB leads 0 • ICON leads 0 • TRMD leads 0 • AEO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 1103.8x XELB's $5M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XELB's -4.4%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $6M | $1.3B | $5.5B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$492,000 | $555M | $546M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$5M | $277M | $192M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$24M | $242M | $25M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | -0.7% | +47.2% | +33.0% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -32.2% | +26.6% | +6.0% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -79.7% | +21.4% | +3.5% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -132.8% | -3.9% | +18.7% | +0.5% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | — | -7.8% | +9.7% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | — | -43.0% | -7.4% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ICON and TRMD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 66% valuation discount to AEO's 15.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs STNG's 0.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $2M | $3.4B | $2.8B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $17M | $4.3B | $4.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.25x | -7.35x | 5.21x | 15.27x | 12.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.62x | 12.06x | 8.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.23x | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.12x | 5.07x | 7.99x | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 0.29x | 2.15x | 0.51x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 0.13x | 1.54x | 1.73x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.38x | — | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-131 for XELB. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICON's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -131.3% | -23.9% | +12.9% | +12.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.8% | -8.3% | +8.7% | +4.8% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.6% | +0.8% | +18.0% | +8.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.4% | +1.0% | +22.8% | +10.7% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 1.36x | 0.59x | 1.02x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $15M | $954M | $1.5B | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $946,000 | $272M | $239M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $16M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.56x | -0.97x | 4.61x | 75.18x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $53,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,257 for ICON. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs ICON's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STNG at 24.4% vs ICON's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +120.9% | +91.4% | +70.8% | -35.9% | +71.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.5% | -14.9% | +113.4% | +53.4% | +115.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | -87.4% | +57.3% | +34.4% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -87.4% | +435.1% | -48.1% | +359.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | -87.4% | +585.5% | +45.6% | +62.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | -49.9% | +16.3% | +10.4% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs ICON's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.50x | 0.54x | 2.08x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.17 | $4.23 | $34.88 | $28.46 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $0.55 | $15.79 | $9.27 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +29.6% | +94.9% | +58.5% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 59.7 | 62.3 | 40.8 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 277K | 924K | 5.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMD as "Buy", AEO as "Hold", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for AEO (target: $25) vs 0.8% for STNG (target: $85). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $35.00 | $24.83 | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 3 | 52 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +15.5% | +16.6% | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | $5.48 | — | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
STNG leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, TORM plc is actually cheaper at 6. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +435.
1%, compared to -87. 4% for Icon Energy Corp. (ICON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +585. 5% versus XELB's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning AEO is approximately 641% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 136% for Icon Energy Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TORM plc grew EPS -15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -819. 6% for Xcel Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus -271. 2% for Xcel Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus -259. 2% for XELB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XELB leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TORM plc (TRMD) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEO: 49. 2% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG?
In this comparison, TRMD (16.
6% yield), ICON (15. 5% yield), STNG (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. XELB, AEO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 16. 6% yield, +585. 5% 10Y return). Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMD: +585. 5%, XELB: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XELB and ICON and TRMD and AEO and STNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (XELB (Consumer Cyclical) and ICON (Industrials) and TRMD (Energy) and AEO (Consumer Cyclical) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XELB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICON is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock. ICON, TRMD, STNG pay a dividend while XELB, AEO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.