Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XELB vs LAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
XELB vs LAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $12M | $106M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $193M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -208.4% | -7.2% |
| Total Debt | $13M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $17M |
XELB vs LAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XELB vs LAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XELB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.03
- +2.5% vs LAKE's -33.3%
LAKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth -437.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- 34.0% 10Y total return vs XELB's -96.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 3.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -19.4% margin vs XELB's -437.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs XELB's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.5% vs LAKE's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -17.0% ROA vs XELB's -53.8%, ROIC -5.1% vs -33.6% |
XELB vs LAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XELB vs LAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $193M annually — 38.8x XELB's $5M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -19.4% (LAKE) to -4.4% (XELB). On growth, LAKE holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $193M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -132.8% | -8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | -165.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $106M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $120M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.25x | -4.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAKE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAKE delivers a -27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-28 in annual profit, vs $-131 for XELB. LAKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XELB's 0.47x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -131.3% | -27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.8% | -17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.6% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.4% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.56x | -23.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAKE five years ago would be worth $4,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,279 for XELB. Over the past 12 months, XELB leads with a +2.5% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAKE at -1.3% vs XELB's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +120.9% | +22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.5% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | +34.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | -1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XELB and LAKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAKE is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XELB's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XELB currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.17 | $20.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $7.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 100K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
LAKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.4% |
LAKE leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
XELB vs LAKE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XELB or LAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XELB or LAKE?
Over the past 5 years, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) delivered a total return of -58. 3%, compared to -87. 2% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAKE returned +34. 0% versus XELB's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XELB or LAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Xcel Brands, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning XELB is approximately 50% more volatile than LAKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 47% for Xcel Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XELB or LAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lakeland Industries, Inc. grew EPS -437. 5% year-over-year, compared to -819. 6% for Xcel Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAKE leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XELB or LAKE?
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 8% net margin versus -271. 2% for Xcel Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAKE leads at -5. 5% versus -259. 2% for XELB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XELB leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — XELB or LAKE?
In this comparison, LAKE (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. XELB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is XELB or LAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAKE: +34. 0%, XELB: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between XELB and LAKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XELB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock. LAKE pays a dividend while XELB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.