Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XERS vs CORT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
XERS vs CORT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $5.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $315M | $769M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 55.3x | 136.0x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $120M |
XERS vs CORT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xeris Biopharma Hol… (XERS) | 100 | 129.0 | +29.0% |
| Corcept Therapeutic… (CORT) | 100 | 337.2 | +237.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XERS vs CORT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XERS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.04
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 100.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 2.19x
CORT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs XERS's -67.2%
- 6.2% margin vs XERS's 3.8%
- 5.8% ROA vs XERS's 3.2%, ROIC 6.2% vs 33.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs CORT's 12.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (55.3x vs 136.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs XERS's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs CORT's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.0% vs CORT's -27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.8% ROA vs XERS's 3.2%, ROIC 6.2% vs 33.8% |
XERS vs CORT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XERS vs CORT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XERS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CORT is the larger business by revenue, generating $769M annually — 2.4x XERS's $315M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.2% (CORT) to 3.8% (XERS). On growth, XERS holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $315M | $769M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.4% | +98.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.5% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — XERS and CORT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 62.3x trailing earnings, CORT trades at a 97% valuation discount to XERS's 2071.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XERS's 28.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CORT's 114.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2071.88x | 62.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.25x | 135.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.88x | 114.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.92x | 7.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 83.66x | 9.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.93x | 38.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — XERS and CORT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XERS delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $8 for CORT. CORT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XERS's 2.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XERS scores 7/9 vs CORT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.8% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.76x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$73M | -$114M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — XERS and CORT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CORT five years ago would be worth $24,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,400 for XERS. Over the past 12 months, XERS leads with a +48.0% total return vs CORT's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XERS at 40.3% vs CORT's 29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | +33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.0% | -27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.2% | +114.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +141.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | +929.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.3% | +29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
XERS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XERS is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CORT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XERS currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs CORT's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.08 | $91.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.30 | $28.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.8% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 76.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XERS as "Buy" and CORT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.4% upside for CORT (target: $72) vs 35.7% for XERS (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $71.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +4.5% |
XERS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Risk & Volatility. 3 categories are tied.
XERS vs CORT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XERS or CORT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) offers the better valuation at 62. 3x trailing P/E (136. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (XERS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XERS or CORT?
On trailing P/E, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) is the cheapest at 62.
3x versus Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. at 2071. 9x. On forward P/E, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XERS or CORT?
Over the past 5 years, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +104. 0% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (XERS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CORT returned +929. 2% versus XERS's -67. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XERS or CORT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated's 1. 78β — meaning CORT is approximately 71% more volatile than XERS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XERS or CORT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus 12. 8% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 100. 9% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, XERS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XERS or CORT?
Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 0. 2% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XERS leads at 8. 5% versus 5. 9% for CORT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CORT leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XERS or CORT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) trades at 55. 3x forward P/E versus 136. 0x for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated — 80. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CORT: 40. 4% to $71. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — XERS or CORT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XERS or CORT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+929.
2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CORT: +929. 2%, XERS: -67. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XERS and CORT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XERS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CORT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.