XHLD
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
Broadcasting
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.+6.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
XHLD vs ELF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
Household & Personal Products
Market Cap$3.44B
5Y Perf.-12.1%
XHLD vs ELF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | XHLD | ELF |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $6M | $3.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 78.6% | 70.3% |
| Operating Margin | -432.5% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $313M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $149M |
XHLD vs ELF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
XHLD
ELF
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEN Holdings, Inc. … (XHLD) | 100 | 106.8 | +6.8% |
| e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHLD vs ELF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ELF leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XHLD
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
The Income Pick
XHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.09
- Lower volatility, beta 2.09, current ratio 1.43x
- Beta 2.09, current ratio 1.43x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
The Growth Play
ELF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.3%, EPS growth -13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 49.6%
- 133.1% 10Y total return vs XHLD's -79.3%
- 28.3% revenue growth vs XHLD's -11.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ELF | 28.3% revenue growth vs XHLD's -11.4% |
| Quality / Margins | ELF | 6.8% margin vs XHLD's -6.3% |
| Stability / Safety | XHLD | Beta 2.09 vs ELF's 2.36 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | XHLD | +81.9% vs ELF's -7.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ELF | 4.5% ROA vs XHLD's -175.1%, ROIC 13.5% vs -164.2% |
XHLD vs ELF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLELFLAGGINGXHLD
XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc. Co…
1leads
ELFe.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XHLDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ELF5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
XHLD3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ELF7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ELF4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELF is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 489.6x XHLD's $3M. ELF is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XHLD's -6.3%. On growth, ELF holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc… | ELFe.l.f. Beauty, In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $235M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.6% | +70.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.9% | +14.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.7% | +37.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +116.7% |
ELF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
XHLD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc… | ELFe.l.f. Beauty, In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 32.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 2.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 4.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.86x |
XHLD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELF delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-4 for XHLD. ELF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XHLD's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELF scores 7/9 vs XHLD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc… | ELFe.l.f. Beauty, In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -175.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -164.2% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | +16.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $164M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $149M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $313M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.20x | 6.48x |
ELF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELF five years ago would be worth $20,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,074 for XHLD. Over the past 12 months, XHLD leads with a +81.9% total return vs ELF's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELF at -11.8% vs XHLD's -40.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc… | ELFe.l.f. Beauty, In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | -20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.9% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +105.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +133.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.8% | -11.8% |
ELF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XHLD and ELF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XHLD is the less volatile stock with a 2.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELF's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELF currently trades 40.9% from its 52-week high vs XHLD's 31.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc… | ELFe.l.f. Beauty, In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.54 | $150.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $58.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.1% | +40.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 2.3M |
Evenly matched — XHLD and ELF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc… | ELFe.l.f. Beauty, In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ELF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XHLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best Overalle.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
XHLD vs ELF: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHLD or ELF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, e.
l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) is the stronger pick with 28. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD). e. l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (19. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate e. l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XHLD or ELF?
Over the past 5 years, e.
l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) delivered a total return of +105. 0%, compared to -79. 3% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELF returned +133. 1% versus XHLD's -79. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XHLD or ELF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TEN Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (XHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 09β versus e. l. f. Beauty, Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning ELF is approximately 13% more volatile than XHLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, e. l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 119% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XHLD or ELF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), e.
l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) is pulling ahead at 28. 3% versus -11. 4% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: e. l. f. Beauty, Inc. grew EPS -13. 1% year-over-year, compared to -376. 7% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELF leads at 49. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XHLD or ELF?
e.
l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -628. 5% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELF leads at 12. 0% versus -432. 5% for XHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XHLD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — XHLD or ELF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is XHLD or ELF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, e.
l. f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+133. 1% 10Y return). TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELF: +133. 1%, XHLD: -79. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between XHLD and ELF?
These companies operate in different sectors (XHLD (Communication Services) and ELF (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XHLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ELF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(XHLD: -13.7% · ELF: 37.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.