Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XHLD
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.+4.5%
REVG
REV Group, Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.12B
5Y Perf.+109.5%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.-37.3%
WNC
Wabash National Corporation

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-36.2%
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118M
5Y Perf.-60.5%

XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XHLD logoXHLD
REVG logoREVG
HIMS logoHIMS
WNC logoWNC
SKIN logoSKIN
IndustryBroadcastingAgricultural - MachineryMedical - Equipment & ServicesAgricultural - MachineryHousehold & Personal Products
Market Cap$6M$3.12B$6.63B$317M$118M
Revenue (TTM)$3M$2.40B$2.35B$1.47B$296M
Net Income (TTM)$-20M$108M$128M$-65M$-6M
Gross Margin78.6%14.4%69.7%2.0%64.9%
Operating Margin-432.5%7.1%4.6%-3.1%-3.6%
Forward P/E17.2x58.3x1.5x
Total Debt$5M$56M$1.12B$443M$379M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$35M$229M$32M$233M

XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XHLD
REVG
HIMS
WNC
SKIN
StockFeb 25May 26Return
TEN Holdings, Inc. … (XHLD)100104.5+4.5%
REV Group, Inc. (REVG)100209.5+109.5%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)10062.7-37.3%
Wabash National Cor… (WNC)10063.8-36.2%
The Beauty Health C… (SKIN)10039.5-60.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: REVG and HIMS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. WNC and XHLD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XHLD
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
The Momentum Pick

XHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +81.9% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Best for: momentum
REVG
REV Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

REVG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.4%
  • 174.2% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 13.5%, current ratio 1.51x
  • Beta 1.48, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.51x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
  • 5.5% margin vs XHLD's -6.3%
Best for: growth exposure
WNC
Wabash National Corporation
The Value Play

WNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (1.5x vs 58.3x)
  • 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, SKIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
ValueWNC logoWNCLower P/E (1.5x vs 58.3x)
Quality / MarginsHIMS logoHIMS5.5% margin vs XHLD's -6.3%
Stability / SafetyREVG logoREVGBeta 1.48 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsWNC logoWNC4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)XHLD logoXHLD+81.9% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Efficiency (ROA)REVG logoREVG8.9% ROA vs XHLD's -175.1%, ROIC 29.9% vs -164.2%

XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

REVGREV Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Vehicles
73.7%$1.8B
Recreational Vehicles
26.3%$649M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

WNCWabash National Corporation
FY 2025
New Trailers
65.4%$1.0B
Equipment and Other
26.1%$403M
Components, Parts and Services
8.3%$127M
Used Trailers
0.3%$5M
SKINThe Beauty Health Company
FY 2025
Consumables
70.7%$213M
Delivery Systems
29.3%$88M

XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLREVGLAGGINGSKIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — REVG and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

REVG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 772.2x XHLD's $3M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XHLD's -6.3%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXHLD logoXHLDTEN Holdings, Inc…REVG logoREVGREV Group, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…WNC logoWNCWabash National C…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$2.4B$2.3B$1.5B$296M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$13M$193M$164M-$2M$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$20M$108M$128M-$65M-$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M$200M$73M-$38M$29M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.6%+14.4%+69.7%+2.0%+64.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.3%+7.1%+4.6%-3.1%-3.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.3%+4.5%+5.5%-4.4%-2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-42.9%+8.3%+3.1%-2.6%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.7%+11.3%+28.4%-20.4%-6.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.0%+68.6%-27.3%-120.7%+38.0%
Evenly matched — REVG and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — WNC and SKIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 97% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.

MetricXHLD logoXHLDTEN Holdings, Inc…REVG logoREVGREV Group, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…WNC logoWNCWabash National C…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
Market CapShares × price$6M$3.1B$6.6B$317M$118M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9M$3.1B$7.5B$728M$264M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.16x33.81x50.32x1.54x-5.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.18x58.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.35x42.68x1.92x7331.15x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x1.27x2.82x0.21x0.39x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.75x7.73x12.25x0.88x2.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.41x89.61x3.17x
Evenly matched — WNC and SKIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-4 for XHLD. REVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs XHLD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXHLD logoXHLDTEN Holdings, Inc…REVG logoREVGREV Group, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…WNC logoWNCWabash National C…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.3%+27.9%+23.7%-17.3%-9.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-175.1%+8.9%+6.0%-5.0%-1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-164.2%+29.9%+10.7%+37.4%-6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.5%+27.0%+10.9%+32.6%-4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937447
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.19x0.13x2.07x1.20x6.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$21M$892M$411M$146M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$35M$229M$32M$233M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$56M$1.1B$443M$379M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-71.20x6.03x-0.97x0.81x
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

REVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, XHLD leads with a +81.9% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXHLD logoXHLDTEN Holdings, Inc…REVG logoREVGREV Group, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…WNC logoWNCWabash National C…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.8%+2.6%-23.2%-11.0%-35.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+81.9%+80.3%-51.0%+0.4%-35.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.3%+535.6%+116.6%-63.9%-91.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.3%+261.2%+137.6%-48.5%-92.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.3%+174.2%+161.9%-22.6%-91.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-40.8%+85.2%+29.4%-28.8%-56.4%
REVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

REVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

REVG is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REVG currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs XHLD's 31.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXHLD logoXHLDTEN Holdings, Inc…REVG logoREVGREV Group, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…WNC logoWNCWabash National C…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.98x1.48x2.48x1.85x1.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.54$69.92$70.43$12.94$2.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$34.96$13.74$7.10$0.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.1%+91.4%+36.4%+60.3%+33.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.050.654.537.752.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded30K1.6M34.9M598K760K
REVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: REVG as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", WNC as "Hold", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for SKIN (target: $1) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs REVG's 0.40%.

MetricXHLD logoXHLDTEN Holdings, Inc…REVG logoREVGREV Group, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…WNC logoWNCWabash National C…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$55.00$26.20$8.50$1.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts12191813
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.26$0.33
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%+1.4%+10.6%0.0%
WNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

REVG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WNC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallREV Group, Inc. (REVG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate REV Group, Inc. (REVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?

On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.

5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, REV Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?

Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus SKIN's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 68% more volatile than REVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -376. 7% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?

Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

7% net margin versus -628. 5% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus -432. 5% for XHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XHLD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 41. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKIN: 42. 9% to $1. 30.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?

In this comparison, WNC (4.

2% yield), REVG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. XHLD, HIMS, SKIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4.

2% yield). TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WNC: -24. 9%, XHLD: -79. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XHLD and REVG and HIMS and WNC and SKIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (XHLD (Communication Services) and REVG (Industrials) and HIMS (Healthcare) and WNC (Industrials) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XHLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WNC pays a dividend while XHLD, REVG, HIMS, SKIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XHLD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REVG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XHLD and REVG and HIMS and WNC and SKIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XHLD: -13.7% · REVG: 11.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.