Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Medical - Equipment & Services
Agricultural - Machinery
Household & Personal Products
XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Agricultural - Machinery | Medical - Equipment & Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $6M | $3.12B | $6.63B | $317M | $118M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $2.40B | $2.35B | $1.47B | $296M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $108M | $128M | $-65M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 78.6% | 14.4% | 69.7% | 2.0% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -432.5% | 7.1% | 4.6% | -3.1% | -3.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x | 58.3x | 1.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $56M | $1.12B | $443M | $379M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $35M | $229M | $32M | $233M |
XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEN Holdings, Inc. … (XHLD) | 100 | 104.5 | +4.5% |
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 209.5 | +109.5% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 62.7 | -37.3% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 39.5 | -60.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +81.9% vs HIMS's -51.0%
REVG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.4%
- 174.2% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 13.5%, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 1.48, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.51x
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
- 5.5% margin vs XHLD's -6.3%
WNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 58.3x)
- 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, SKIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 58.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs XHLD's -6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.9% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs XHLD's -175.1%, ROIC 29.9% vs -164.2% |
XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REVG leads in 3 of 6 categories
WNC leads 1 • XHLD leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — REVG and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REVG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 772.2x XHLD's $3M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XHLD's -6.3%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $2.4B | $2.3B | $1.5B | $296M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $193M | $164M | -$2M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $108M | $128M | -$65M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $200M | $73M | -$38M | $29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.6% | +14.4% | +69.7% | +2.0% | +64.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +7.1% | +4.6% | -3.1% | -3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | +4.5% | +5.5% | -4.4% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.9% | +8.3% | +3.1% | -2.6% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.7% | +11.3% | +28.4% | -20.4% | -6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +68.6% | -27.3% | -120.7% | +38.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WNC and SKIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 97% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $3.1B | $6.6B | $317M | $118M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $3.1B | $7.5B | $728M | $264M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 33.81x | 50.32x | 1.54x | -5.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.18x | 58.29x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.35x | 42.68x | 1.92x | 7331.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 1.27x | 2.82x | 0.21x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 7.73x | 12.25x | 0.88x | 2.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.41x | 89.61x | — | 3.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-4 for XHLD. REVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs XHLD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +27.9% | +23.7% | -17.3% | -9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -175.1% | +8.9% | +6.0% | -5.0% | -1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -164.2% | +29.9% | +10.7% | +37.4% | -6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | +27.0% | +10.9% | +32.6% | -4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 0.13x | 2.07x | 1.20x | 6.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $21M | $892M | $411M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $35M | $229M | $32M | $233M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $56M | $1.1B | $443M | $379M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.20x | 6.03x | — | -0.97x | 0.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, XHLD leads with a +81.9% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | +2.6% | -23.2% | -11.0% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.9% | +80.3% | -51.0% | +0.4% | -35.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +535.6% | +116.6% | -63.9% | -91.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +261.2% | +137.6% | -48.5% | -92.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +174.2% | +161.9% | -22.6% | -91.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.8% | +85.2% | +29.4% | -28.8% | -56.4% |
Risk & Volatility
REVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REVG is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REVG currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs XHLD's 31.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.48x | 2.48x | 1.85x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.54 | $69.92 | $70.43 | $12.94 | $2.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $34.96 | $13.74 | $7.10 | $0.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.1% | +91.4% | +36.4% | +60.3% | +33.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 50.6 | 54.5 | 37.7 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 1.6M | 34.9M | 598K | 760K |
Analyst Outlook
WNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REVG as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", WNC as "Hold", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for SKIN (target: $1) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs REVG's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $55.00 | $26.20 | $8.50 | $1.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 19 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.26 | — | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +1.4% | +10.6% | 0.0% |
REVG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WNC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
XHLD vs REVG vs HIMS vs WNC vs SKIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate REV Group, Inc. (REVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, REV Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus SKIN's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 68% more volatile than REVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -376. 7% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus -628. 5% for TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus -432. 5% for XHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XHLD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 41. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKIN: 42. 9% to $1. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), REVG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. XHLD, HIMS, SKIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XHLD or REVG or HIMS or WNC or SKIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4.
2% yield). TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WNC: -24. 9%, XHLD: -79. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XHLD and REVG and HIMS and WNC and SKIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (XHLD (Communication Services) and REVG (Industrials) and HIMS (Healthcare) and WNC (Industrials) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XHLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WNC pays a dividend while XHLD, REVG, HIMS, SKIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.