Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XPER
Xperi Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$884M
5Y Perf.-41.6%
ADTN
ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.+31.1%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$76.14B
5Y Perf.+891.9%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.-32.8%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.74B
5Y Perf.+1132.2%

XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XPER logoXPER
ADTN logoADTN
CIEN logoCIEN
IPGP logoIPGP
LITE logoLITE
IndustrySemiconductorsCommunication EquipmentCommunication EquipmentSemiconductorsCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$884M$1.17B$76.14B$4.31B$63.74B
Revenue (TTM)$439M$1.12B$5.12B$1.04B$2.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-15M$-30M$229M$29M$440M
Gross Margin61.9%38.6%40.6%37.6%37.7%
Operating Margin1.7%-0.5%8.2%0.3%9.5%
Forward P/E8.4x27.6x89.1x78.1x110.1x
Total Debt$30M$245M$1.58B$0.00$2.61B
Cash & Equiv.$73M$96M$1.09B$404M$521M

XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XPER
ADTN
CIEN
IPGP
LITE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Xperi Inc. (XPER)10058.4-41.6%
ADTRAN Holdings, In… (ADTN)100131.1+31.1%
Ciena Corporation (CIEN)100991.9+891.9%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)10067.2-32.8%
Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE)1001232.2+1132.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LITE leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Xperi Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XPER
Xperi Inc.
The Defensive Pick

XPER is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 3.81x
  • Lower P/E (8.4x vs 110.1x)
  • Beta 1.52 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage
  • 2.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ADTN
ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick

ADTN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
The Quality Angle

CIEN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Income Pick

IPGP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.80
  • Beta 1.80, current ratio 6.08x
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play

LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
  • 36.4% 10Y total return vs CIEN's 32.3%
  • 21.0% revenue growth vs XPER's -9.2%
  • 17.7% margin vs XPER's -3.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLITE logoLITE21.0% revenue growth vs XPER's -9.2%
ValueXPER logoXPERLower P/E (8.4x vs 110.1x)
Quality / MarginsLITE logoLITE17.7% margin vs XPER's -3.5%
Stability / SafetyXPER logoXPERBeta 1.52 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage
DividendsXPER logoXPER2.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LITE logoLITE+12.5% vs XPER's +11.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LITE logoLITE8.5% ROA vs ADTN's -2.5%, ROIC -4.3% vs -1.7%

XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XPERXperi Inc.
FY 2025
Media Platform
94.2%$418M
Semiconductor
5.8%$26M
ADTNADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Optical Networking Solutions
35.1%$380M
Subscriber Solutions And Experience
34.1%$369M
Access & Aggregation Solutions
30.9%$334M
CIENCiena Corporation
FY 2024
Networking Platforms Segment
75.8%$3.0B
Global Services
13.4%$537M
Platform Software and Services Segment
8.9%$358M
Blue Planet Automation Software and Services Segment
1.9%$78M
IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.
FY 2023
Lasers Segment
100.0%$209M

XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLITELAGGINGCIEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CIEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 11.7x XPER's $439M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPER's -3.5%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXPER logoXPERXperi Inc.ADTN logoADTNADTRAN Holdings, …CIEN logoCIENCiena CorporationIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$439M$1.1B$5.1B$1.0B$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$74M$43M$571M$55M$425M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$15M-$30M$229M$29M$440M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$308M$58M$742M$8M$399M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.9%+38.6%+40.6%+37.6%+37.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.7%-0.5%+8.2%+0.3%+9.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.5%-2.6%+4.5%+2.8%+17.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+70.1%+5.2%+14.5%+0.8%+16.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.1%+15.5%+33.1%+16.6%+90.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+148.8%+92.9%+2.3%-54.4%+3.3%
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — XPER and ADTN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 139.2x trailing earnings, IPGP trades at a 94% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADTN's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.

MetricXPER logoXPERXperi Inc.ADTN logoADTNADTRAN Holdings, …CIEN logoCIENCiena CorporationIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…
Market CapShares × price$884M$1.2B$76.1B$4.3B$63.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$841M$1.3B$76.6B$3.9B$65.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.29x-25.53x633.25x139.22x2412.94x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.40x27.63x89.15x78.05x110.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple56.60x17.20x169.86x48.90x859.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.97x1.08x15.96x4.30x38.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.82x2.23x28.64x2.04x54.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.66x11.98x114.44x
Evenly matched — XPER and ADTN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CIEN and LITE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ADTN. XPER carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIEN scores 8/9 vs XPER's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXPER logoXPERXperi Inc.ADTN logoADTNADTRAN Holdings, …CIEN logoCIENCiena CorporationIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.4%-5.5%+8.3%+1.4%+30.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.6%-2.5%+4.0%+1.2%+8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-8.0%-1.7%+6.9%+0.6%-4.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.1%-1.8%+6.8%+0.6%-4.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.47x0.58x2.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$43M$149M$490M-$404M$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$73M$96M$1.1B$404M$521M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$30M$245M$1.6B$0$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.03x0.14x3.94x9.62x
Evenly matched — CIEN and LITE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,849 for XPER. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs XPER's +11.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs XPER's -7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXPER logoXPERXperi Inc.ADTN logoADTNADTRAN Holdings, …CIEN logoCIENCiena CorporationIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.1%+67.6%+118.8%+35.8%+131.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+11.4%+83.0%+633.9%+75.6%+1247.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.3%+70.9%+1127.8%-12.7%+1764.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.5%-22.5%+899.2%-48.5%+976.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.7%-8.3%+3230.8%+20.2%+3635.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.3%+19.6%+130.7%-4.4%+165.2%
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XPER and CIEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XPER is the less volatile stock with a 1.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIEN currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs IPGP's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXPER logoXPERXperi Inc.ADTN logoADTNADTRAN Holdings, …CIEN logoCIENCiena CorporationIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x1.88x2.51x1.68x2.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.50$18.69$583.77$155.82$1021.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.07$7.11$70.77$53.98$60.38
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.1%+77.8%+92.2%+65.2%+87.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.950.871.339.758.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded338K2.2M2.8M510K6.4M
Evenly matched — XPER and CIEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: XPER as "Buy", ADTN as "Buy", CIEN as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", LITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.0% upside for IPGP (target: $141) vs -33.8% for CIEN (target: $356). XPER is the only dividend payer here at 2.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXPER logoXPERXperi Inc.ADTN logoADTNADTRAN Holdings, …CIEN logoCIENCiena CorporationIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$356.25$141.25$918.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts925412725
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+0.4%+1.3%+0.1%
IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LITE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IPGP leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallLumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XPER vs ADTN vs CIEN vs IPGP vs LITE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lumentum Holdings Inc.

(LITE) is the stronger pick with 21. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 2% for Xperi Inc. (XPER). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) offers the better valuation at 139. 2x trailing P/E (78. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xperi Inc. (XPER) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE?

On trailing P/E, IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is the cheapest at 139.

2x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Xperi Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE?

Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.

(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -61. 5% for Xperi Inc. (XPER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus XPER's -13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xperi Inc.

(XPER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning LITE is approximately 84% more volatile than XPER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xperi Inc. (XPER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lumentum Holdings Inc.

(LITE) is pulling ahead at 21. 0% versus -9. 2% for Xperi Inc. (XPER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to -296. 8% for Xperi Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIEN leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE?

IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is the more profitable company, earning 3.

1% net margin versus -12. 6% for Xperi Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIEN leads at 6. 5% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPER leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Xperi Inc.

(XPER) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 110. 1x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 101. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 39. 0% to $141. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE?

In this comparison, XPER (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ADTN, CIEN, IPGP, LITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XPER or ADTN or CIEN or IPGP or LITE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Xperi Inc.

(XPER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 5% yield). Ciena Corporation (CIEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XPER: -13. 6%, CIEN: +32. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XPER and ADTN and CIEN and IPGP and LITE?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: XPER is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADTN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIEN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. XPER pays a dividend while ADTN, CIEN, IPGP, LITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XPER

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ADTN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIEN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LITE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 45%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XPER and ADTN and CIEN and IPGP and LITE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XPER: -8.1% · ADTN: 15.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.