Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YAAS vs BZUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
YAAS vs BZUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $494K | $164M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $9.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-204M |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 49.2% |
| Operating Margin | -248.7% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.9x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18K | $1.64B |
YAAS vs BZUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Youxin Technology L… (YAAS) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Baozun Inc. (BZUN) | 100 | 101.8 | +1.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YAAS vs BZUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, YAAS is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
BZUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 34.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- -51.8% 10Y total return vs YAAS's -99.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs YAAS's -41.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.1% margin vs YAAS's -271.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs YAAS's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.9% vs YAAS's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.1% ROA vs YAAS's -65.8% |
YAAS vs BZUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YAAS vs BZUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YAAS and BZUN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BZUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 7202.3x YAAS's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.1% (BZUN) to -2.7% (YAAS). On growth, YAAS holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $9.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$204M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.2% | +49.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.8% | -29.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BZUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $493,536 | $164M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $293M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | -6.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.95x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BZUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BZUN delivers a -3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-109 for YAAS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BZUN scores 6/9 vs YAAS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.8% | -2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $879M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18,372 | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BZUN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BZUN five years ago would be worth $843 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for YAAS. Over the past 12 months, BZUN leads with a -3.9% total return vs YAAS's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BZUN at -16.0% vs YAAS's -84.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.7% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | -3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -51.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.1% | -16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BZUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BZUN is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YAAS's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BZUN currently trades 56.1% from its 52-week high vs YAAS's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $560.00 | $4.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $2.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% |
BZUN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
YAAS vs BZUN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YAAS or BZUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -41. 8% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Analysts rate Baozun Inc. (BZUN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YAAS or BZUN?
Over the past 5 years, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) delivered a total return of -91. 6%, compared to -99. 6% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BZUN returned -51. 8% versus YAAS's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YAAS or BZUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Youxin Technology Ltd's 1. 60β — meaning YAAS is approximately 8% more volatile than BZUN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — YAAS or BZUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -41. 8% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Youxin Technology Ltd grew EPS 56. 9% year-over-year, compared to 34. 0% for Baozun Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BZUN leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YAAS or BZUN?
Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 0% net margin versus -245. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd — meaning it keeps -2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BZUN leads at -1. 2% versus -266. 4% for YAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YAAS leads at 65. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YAAS or BZUN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is YAAS or BZUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BZUN: -51. 8%, YAAS: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YAAS and BZUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (YAAS (Technology) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.