Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Financial - Capital Markets
Biotechnology
YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Financial - Capital Markets | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $22M | $5.83B | $1.62B | $631M | $9.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $428M | $164M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-464M | $-58M | $137M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | — | 91.9% | 61.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -286.5% | — | -8.7% | 16.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 9.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $23K | $98K | $212M | $14M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $714M | $68M | $95M | $357M |
YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 516.4 | +416.4% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 52.3 | -47.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YDES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 13.18x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 13.18x
- Beta 0.80 vs BTBT's 3.41, lower leverage
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 308.0% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 187.9%
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- 17.3% margin vs YDES's -276.6%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.9% vs YDES's -56.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs YDES's -276.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs BTBT's 3.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.9% vs YDES's -56.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs YDES's -100.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -63.3% |
YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • YDES leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • ARDX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARDX and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $428M and $0 in trailing revenue. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YDES's -2.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $428M | $164M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$487M | -$35M | $166M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$464M | -$58M | $137M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$423M | -$37M | -$448M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | — | +91.9% | +61.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | — | -8.7% | +16.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | — | -13.6% | +17.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | — | -8.8% | -65.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +27.5% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -116.0% | +19.7% | +11.8% | +2.8% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BTBT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $5.8B | $1.6B | $631M | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $5.1B | $1.8B | $550M | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.27x | -10.49x | -25.42x | 9.80x | -25.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 42.16x | — | 3.98x | 3.86x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.27x | 6.14x | 9.54x | 0.60x | 8.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | -47.1% | -38.1% | +21.4% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -100.8% | -44.1% | -11.8% | +19.0% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -63.3% | — | -10.7% | +6.5% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.1% | -66.1% | -10.6% | +8.5% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 1.27x | 0.03x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$714M | $144M | -$81M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $714M | $68M | $95M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22,555 | $98,000 | $212M | $14M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1893.69x | — | -0.28x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $39,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,019 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +793.3% total return vs YDES's -56.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 180.2% vs YDES's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.8% | +10.6% | +7.5% | -3.9% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.9% | +96.9% | +87.3% | -8.8% | +793.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | +59.6% | +54.1% | -1.0% | +2100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | +83.3% | +293.5% | -79.8% | +5.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | +187.9% | +308.0% | -57.6% | -17.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | +16.9% | +15.5% | -0.3% | +180.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YDES and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YDES is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs YDES's 20.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.36x | 1.05x | 3.41x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $30.16 | $8.40 | $4.55 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $13.52 | $3.21 | $1.25 | $35.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.8% | +95.0% | +78.7% | +43.1% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 59.5 | 54.4 | 71.4 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 1.4M | 3.6M | 19.6M | 380K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMVT as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.2% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 58.8% for IMVT (target: $46). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $45.50 | $17.00 | $5.00 | $548.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 16 | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
YDES vs IMVT vs ARDX vs BTBT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +293. 5%, compared to -79. 8% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARDX returned +308. 0% versus BTBT's -57. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares (YDES) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 328% more volatile than YDES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -52. 9% for Ardelyx, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -276. 6% for YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -286. 5% for YDES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARDX leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. YDES, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is YDES or IMVT or ARDX or BTBT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), +308. 0% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARDX: +308. 0%, BTBT: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YDES and IMVT and ARDX and BTBT and PRAX?
These companies operate in different sectors (YDES (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ARDX (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YDES is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.