Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $22M | $1.76B | $5.83B | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $81M | $0.00 | $124M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-103M | $-464M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 94.4% | — | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | -286.5% | -140.4% | — | 6.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.1x | — | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $23K | $18M | $98K | $335M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $41M | $714M | $3M |
YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) | 100 | 62.7 | -37.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 4.6 | -95.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YDES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 13.18x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 13.18x
- 45.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
ZYME is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +98.8% vs YDES's -56.9%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 187.9% 10Y total return vs ZYME's 83.8%
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 20.5% margin vs YDES's -276.6%
- 12.2% ROA vs YDES's -100.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.5% margin vs YDES's -276.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs AGEN's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.8% vs YDES's -56.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs YDES's -100.8% |
YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZYME leads 1 • YDES leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $124M and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YDES's -2.8%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +40.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $81M | $0 | $124M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$118M | -$487M | $15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$103M | -$464M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$45.7B | -$423M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +94.4% | — | +31.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -140.4% | — | +6.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -126.3% | — | +20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -563.0% | — | -136.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -91.1% | — | +40.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -116.0% | -96.7% | +19.7% | +199.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $1.8B | $5.8B | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $1.7B | $5.1B | $464M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.27x | -22.13x | -10.49x | -1011.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.09x | — | 2.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 42.16x | 16.59x | — | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.27x | 6.71x | 6.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZYME leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZYME delivers a -0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZYME's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZYME scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | -0.2% | -47.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -100.8% | -0.1% | -44.1% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -63.3% | -25.9% | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.1% | -27.3% | -66.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.07x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$23M | -$714M | $332M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $41M | $714M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22,555 | $18M | $98,000 | $335M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1893.69x | -52.03x | — | 2.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ZYME and IMVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $18,330 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $568 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, ZYME leads with a +98.8% total return vs YDES's -56.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZYME at 34.3% vs AGEN's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.8% | -10.2% | +10.6% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.9% | +98.8% | +96.9% | -1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | +142.4% | +59.6% | -87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | -13.3% | +83.3% | -94.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | +83.8% | +187.9% | -94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | +34.3% | +16.9% | -50.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YDES and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YDES is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs YDES's 20.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.90x | 1.36x | 2.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $29.75 | $30.16 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $10.93 | $13.52 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.8% | +80.3% | +95.0% | +46.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 36.1 | 59.5 | 38.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 623K | 1.4M | 867K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZYME as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 58.8% for IMVT (target: $46).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $38.33 | $45.50 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 23 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ZYME leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
YDES vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares (YDES) is the stronger pick with 45.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Analysts rate Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +83. 3%, compared to -94. 3% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +187. 9% versus AGEN's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares (YDES) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 224% more volatile than YDES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Zymeworks Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares (YDES) is pulling ahead at 45.
8% versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGEN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -276. 6% for YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -286. 5% for YDES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZYME leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for Zymeworks Inc. — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 113. 1% to $7. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is YDES or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, YD Bio Limited Ordinary Shares (YDES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YDES: -56. 9%, AGEN: -94. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between YDES and ZYME and IMVT and AGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YDES is a small-cap high-growth stock; ZYME is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.