Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $1.81B | $372.42B | $4.70T | $2.94T | $3.06T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.46B | $45.18B | $422.57B | $742.78B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $146M | $10.98B | $160.21B | $90.80B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 48.5% | 60.4% | 50.6% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 29.5% | 32.7% | 11.5% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 24.7x | 28.9x | 35.1x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $14.46B | $59.29B | $152.99B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $216M | $9.03B | $30.71B | $86.81B | $30.24B |
YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 134.4 | +34.4% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 209.4 | +109.4% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 542.0 | +442.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 224.5 | +124.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YELP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.8x)
NFLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- PEG 0.75 vs MSFT's 1.32
- 15.9% revenue growth vs YELP's 3.7%
- Beta 0.39 vs AMZN's 1.51
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- +137.1% vs NFLX's -22.5%
- 27.4% ROA vs AMZN's 11.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs 14.7%
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs YELP's 9.9%
- 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs YELP's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs YELP's 9.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.1% vs NFLX's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs AMZN's 11.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs 14.7% |
YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
YELP leads 1 • NFLX leads 1 • GOOGL leads 1 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 507.0x YELP's $1.5B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YELP's 9.9%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $45.2B | $422.6B | $742.8B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | $30.1B | $161.3B | $155.9B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $146M | $11.0B | $160.2B | $90.8B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $323M | $9.5B | $73.3B | -$2.5B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +48.5% | +60.4% | +50.6% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +29.5% | +32.7% | +11.5% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +24.3% | +37.9% | +12.2% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +20.9% | +17.3% | -0.3% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +17.6% | +21.8% | +16.6% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | +31.1% | +81.9% | +74.8% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
YELP leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, YELP trades at a 66% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.05x vs MSFT's 1.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $372.4B | $4.70T | $2.94T | $3.06T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $377.8B | $4.73T | $3.01T | $3.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | 34.74x | 35.94x | 38.15x | 30.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.11x | 24.69x | 28.91x | 35.07x | 24.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x | 1.20x | 1.36x | 1.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.67x | 12.56x | 31.46x | 20.64x | 19.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 8.24x | 11.66x | 4.10x | 10.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 14.26x | 11.44x | 7.20x | 8.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.61x | 39.36x | 64.14x | 382.27x | 42.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $20 for YELP. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs MSFT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.0% | +41.3% | +39.0% | +23.3% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.9% | +19.8% | +27.4% | +11.5% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.1% | +29.8% | +25.1% | +14.7% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.9% | +30.5% | +30.3% | +15.3% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.54x | 0.14x | 0.37x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$174M | $5.4B | $28.6B | $66.2B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $216M | $9.0B | $30.7B | $86.8B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $14.5B | $59.3B | $153.0B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 392.15x | 39.96x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,706 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,545 for YELP. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +137.1% total return vs NFLX's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.6% vs YELP's 1.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | -3.4% | +23.3% | +20.8% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.6% | -22.5% | +137.1% | +46.8% | -4.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.8% | +172.3% | +269.5% | +158.9% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.6% | +77.2% | +237.1% | +67.3% | +72.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | +883.1% | +991.5% | +730.1% | +770.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.6% | +39.6% | +54.6% | +37.3% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.39x | 1.26x | 1.51x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.22 | $134.12 | $392.82 | $278.56 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.60 | $75.01 | $147.84 | $183.85 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.9% | +65.5% | +98.9% | +98.2% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 39.8 | 80.1 | 79.8 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 44.8M | 28.3M | 45.6M | 32.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YELP as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs -3.0% for YELP (target: $28). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.78% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.33 | $116.29 | $406.28 | $306.77 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 99 | 82 | 94 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.82 | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.1% | +2.5% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). YELP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YELP vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Yelp Inc. (YELP). Yelp Inc. (YELP) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the cheapest at 13. 0x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Yelp Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +237. 1%, compared to -24. 6% for Yelp Inc. (YELP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +991. 5% versus YELP's +36. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 288% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 3. 7% for Yelp Inc. (YELP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 9. 9% for Yelp Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YELP leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Yelp Inc. (YELP) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 34. 1% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. YELP, NFLX, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YELP or NFLX or GOOGL or AMZN or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +883. 1% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +883. 1%, AMZN: +730. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YELP and NFLX and GOOGL and AMZN and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (YELP (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while YELP, NFLX, GOOGL, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.