Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.76B | $5.19B | $5.19B | $192M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.46B | $4.37B | $8.31B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $146M | $-1.30B | $14M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 8.0% | 10.8% | 91.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | -6.6% | -4.2% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | — | 56.5x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $193M | $454M | $498M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $216M | $962M | $199M | $304M |
YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 72.0 | -28.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YELP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.82
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs OPEN's -49.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
OPEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +6.8% vs ANGI's -57.4%
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
ANGI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 56.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 56.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs OPEN's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs ANGI's -57.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.9% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC 25.1% vs -16.6% |
YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YELP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ANGI leads 1 • OPEN leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YELP and COMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 8.1x ANGI's $1.0B. YELP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -29.7%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $4.4B | $8.3B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | -$287M | -$100M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $146M | -$1.3B | $14M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $323M | $1.0B | $16M | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +8.0% | +10.8% | +91.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -6.6% | -4.2% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | -29.7% | +0.2% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +23.7% | +0.2% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | -32.1% | +99.4% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | -7.9% | +133.3% | -163.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.1x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 60% valuation discount to YELP's 12.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANGI's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 65.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $5.2B | $5.2B | $192M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $4.4B | $5.4B | $386M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.64x | -3.20x | -92.40x | 5.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.67x | — | 56.51x | 5.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.44x | — | 65.33x | 3.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 1.19x | 0.75x | 0.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.59x | 4.15x | 6.71x | 0.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.44x | 5.00x | 25.55x | 4.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 20.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-129 for OPEN. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YELP scores 6/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.0% | -129.4% | +1.1% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.9% | -54.0% | +0.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.1% | -16.6% | -2.5% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.9% | -12.3% | -2.9% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.19x | 0.58x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$174M | -$769M | $255M | $194M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $216M | $962M | $199M | $304M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $193M | $454M | $498M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -0.12x | 5.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YELP five years ago would be worth $7,405 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $341 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +675.8% total return vs ANGI's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 51.8% vs ANGI's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | -10.4% | -12.0% | -62.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.2% | +675.8% | +19.4% | -57.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | +165.4% | +250.0% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.9% | -69.5% | -44.0% | -96.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.8% | -49.6% | -54.1% | -94.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | +38.4% | +51.8% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
YELP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YELP currently trades 68.7% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 3.09x | 1.79x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.22 | $10.87 | $13.96 | $19.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.60 | $0.51 | $5.66 | $4.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.7% | +50.0% | +66.2% | +24.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 51.8 | 42.3 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 36.3M | 14.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YELP as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold", COMP as "Buy", ANGI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 166.2% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs 0.1% for YELP (target: $28).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.33 | $6.50 | $14.29 | $12.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 26 | 10 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.6% | +22.8% | 0.0% | +77.4% |
YELP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ANGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YELP vs OPEN vs COMP vs ANGI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 1x versus Yelp Inc. at 12. 6x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI?
Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) delivered a total return of -25. 9%, compared to -96. 6% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YELP returned +6. 8% versus ANGI's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 277% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI?
Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YELP leads at 12. 6% versus -6. 6% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 56. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 50. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 166. 2% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is YELP or OPEN or COMP or ANGI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +6. 8%, OPEN: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YELP and OPEN and COMP and ANGI?
These companies operate in different sectors (YELP (Communication Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and ANGI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.