Leisure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Household & Personal Products
Home Improvement
Specialty Retail
YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products | Home Improvement | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $3.25B | $1.89B | $595M | $13M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.83B | $7.19B | $1.79B | $1.21B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $160M | $-281M | $-899M | $-275M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 34.0% | 45.7% | 34.5% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 6.4% | 6.0% | -0.2% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 7.9x | 7.5x | — | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $160M | $5.65B | $78M | $1.01B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $203M | $19M | $64M | $10.73B |
YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE) | 100 | 13.6 | -86.4% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 281.5 | +181.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YETI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 8.8% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
- +49.2% vs LESL's -89.7%
- 12.7% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 27.2% vs 1.6%
NWL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
HELE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 9.8%, current ratio 1.71x
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, LESL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs YETI's 145.1%
- PEG 4.06 vs YETI's 5.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.8% margin vs HELE's -50.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs LESL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.2% vs LESL's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.7% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 27.2% vs 1.6% |
YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YETI leads in 2 of 6 categories
WMT leads 2 • HELE leads 1 • NWL leads 0 • LESL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YETI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 579.2x LESL's $1.2B. YETI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HELE's -50.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $7.2B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $273M | $696M | $107M | $6M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $160M | -$281M | -$899M | -$275M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $231M | $19M | $171M | $8M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +34.0% | +45.7% | +34.5% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +6.4% | +6.0% | -0.2% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | -3.9% | -50.3% | -22.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +0.3% | +9.6% | +0.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | -1.1% | -3.3% | -16.0% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +9.9% | -2.1% | -85.8% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HELE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.5x trailing earnings, YETI trades at a 57% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.33x vs YETI's 7.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $1.9B | $595M | $13M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $7.3B | $654M | $961M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.53x | -6.54x | -0.66x | -0.06x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.83x | 7.93x | 7.53x | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.39x | — | — | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.10x | 9.68x | — | 20.25x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 0.26x | 0.33x | 0.01x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.23x | 0.78x | 0.74x | — | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.34x | 111.23x | 3.48x | — | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YETI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YETI delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-95 for HELE. HELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWL's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YETI scores 6/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.8% | -11.1% | -94.5% | — | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.7% | -2.5% | -37.8% | -42.4% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.2% | +4.3% | +4.6% | +1.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.6% | +5.3% | +5.0% | +2.1% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 2.36x | 0.10x | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $5.4B | $59M | $948M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $203M | $19M | $64M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $160M | $5.7B | $78M | $1.0B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4218.35x | 0.01x | -5.02x | -3.06x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, YETI leads with a +49.2% total return vs LESL's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs LESL's -81.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +21.5% | +25.2% | -17.3% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | -5.4% | +5.4% | -89.7% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.1% | -47.8% | -73.2% | -99.3% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | -75.5% | -88.6% | -99.7% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.1% | -75.8% | -74.4% | -99.7% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | -19.5% | -35.5% | -81.3% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 7.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.91x | 1.65x | 2.20x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.29 | $6.64 | $33.76 | $18.56 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.50 | $3.07 | $13.85 | $0.87 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +67.0% | +76.5% | +7.7% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 64.6 | 78.4 | 47.0 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 5.9M | 627K | 133K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWL and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YETI as "Buy", NWL as "Hold", HELE as "Hold", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.6% upside for NWL (target: $6) vs -14.8% for HELE (target: $22). For income investors, NWL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.71 | $5.50 | $22.00 | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 26 | 11 | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.4% | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | — | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
YETI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
YETI vs NWL vs HELE vs LESL vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT?
On trailing P/E, YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) is the cheapest at 20. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Helen of Troy Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. 's 5. 34x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus LESL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 1783% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for Newell Brands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YETI leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT?
YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus -50. 3% for Helen of Troy Limited — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YETI leads at 11. 4% versus 1. 1% for LESL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YETI leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. 's 5. 34x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 37. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWL: 23. 6% to $5. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT?
In this comparison, NWL (6.
4% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. YETI, HELE, LESL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YETI or NWL or HELE or LESL or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, LESL: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YETI and NWL and HELE and LESL and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (YETI (Consumer Cyclical) and NWL (Consumer Defensive) and HELE (Consumer Defensive) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YETI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. NWL, WMT pay a dividend while YETI, HELE, LESL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.