Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $12M | $2.18B | $26.05B | $2.92T | $145.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $2.09B | $9.38B | $742.78B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-61M | $1.11B | $90.80B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 4.6% | 45.2% | 52.0% | 50.6% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -3.8% | 34.5% | 11.5% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.6x | 12.7x | 34.8x | 60.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $38M | $12.11B | $152.99B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $223M | $68M | $86.81B | $1.53B |
YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LQR House Inc. (YHC) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| The Boston Beer Com… (SAM) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Constellation Brand… (STZ) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 123.2%, EPS growth -24.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 99.5%
- 123.2% revenue growth vs STZ's 2.5%
SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
- Beta 0.29, current ratio 1.65x
STZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 2.7%
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 60.9x)
- Beta 0.26 vs SHOP's 2.64
- 2.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.24 vs SHOP's 2.08
- 12.2% margin vs YHC's -17.2%
- +43.7% vs YHC's -54.6%
- 11.5% ROA vs YHC's -103.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -16.7%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.2% revenue growth vs STZ's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 60.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs YHC's -17.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs YHC's -54.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs YHC's -103.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -16.7% |
YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 2 • SAM leads 1 • YHC leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 353141.0x YHC's $2M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YHC's -17.2%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $2.1B | $9.4B | $742.8B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $14M | $3.7B | $155.9B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$61M | $1.1B | $90.8B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $191M | $1.8B | -$2.5B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +45.2% | +52.0% | +50.6% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | -3.8% | +34.5% | +11.5% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -2.9% | +11.8% | +12.2% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | +9.1% | +18.8% | -0.3% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.0% | +1.7% | -9.8% | +16.6% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -141.9% | -7.4% | -15.0% | +74.8% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.5x trailing earnings, SAM trades at a 83% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $2.2B | $26.1B | $2.92T | $145.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $2.0B | $38.1B | $2.98T | $143.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 20.50x | -333.89x | 37.82x | 118.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.56x | 12.70x | 34.77x | 60.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.35x | 4.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.45x | 9.37x | 20.47x | 95.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.74x | 1.04x | 2.55x | 4.07x | 12.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.54x | 3.82x | 7.14x | 10.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.09x | 13.44x | 378.98x | 72.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-132 for YHC. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STZ's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAM scores 7/9 vs YHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.2% | -7.3% | +13.9% | +23.3% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -103.3% | -5.0% | +5.1% | +11.5% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.7% | +15.5% | +13.0% | +14.7% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +14.8% | +18.0% | +15.3% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 1.70x | 0.37x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$186M | $12.0B | $66.2B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $223M | $68M | $86.8B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $38M | $12.1B | $153.0B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 5.47x | 39.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for YHC. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs YHC's -54.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs YHC's -72.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | +1.5% | +7.9% | +19.7% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.6% | -15.9% | -18.7% | +43.7% | +18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -35.0% | -29.0% | +156.2% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -81.8% | -30.1% | +64.8% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +32.0% | +12.6% | +697.8% | +4123.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.0% | -13.4% | -10.8% | +36.8% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STZ and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs YHC's 7.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.29x | 0.26x | 1.51x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.14 | $264.46 | $196.91 | $278.56 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.53 | $185.34 | $126.45 | $185.01 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.5% | +76.7% | +76.3% | +97.3% | +61.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 28.7 | 45.9 | 81.1 | 34.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 132K | 199K | 1.8M | 45.5M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
STZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAM as "Hold", STZ as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). STZ is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $246.86 | $175.70 | $306.77 | $164.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 46 | 94 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 4 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +9.4% | +4.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
STZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). AMZN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
YHC vs SAM vs STZ vs AMZN vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LQR House Inc.
(YHC) is the stronger pick with 123. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the cheapest at 20. 5x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, Constellation Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -97. 8% for LQR House Inc. (YHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus YHC's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 908% more volatile than STZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LQR House Inc.
(YHC) is pulling ahead at 123. 2% versus 2. 5% for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -104. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YHC leads at 99. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -909. 6% for LQR House Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -739. 0% for YHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STZ leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 48. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP?
In this comparison, STZ (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. YHC, SAM, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YHC or SAM or STZ or AMZN or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 2. 7% yield). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STZ: +12. 6%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YHC and SAM and STZ and AMZN and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (YHC (Consumer Defensive) and SAM (Consumer Defensive) and STZ (Consumer Defensive) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. STZ pays a dividend while YHC, SAM, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.