Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Semiconductors
YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $19.02B | $5.14T | $665.93B | $157.92B | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.14B | $215.94B | $37.45B | $53.69B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.18B | $120.07B | $4.99B | $8.54B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 41.0% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 60.4% | 11.7% | 11.7% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 25.6x | 59.7x | 22.8x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $11.41B | $4.47B | $13.47B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.81B | $10.61B | $5.54B | $7.74B | $14.27B |
YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance… (YMM) | 100 | 43.8 | -56.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1057.5 | +957.5% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 434.9 | +334.9% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 153.1 | +53.1% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 195.3 | +95.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YMM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 9.03x
- Beta 1.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 9.03x
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 105.1x)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs AMD's 110.9%
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 11.55
- 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
Among these 5 stocks, AMD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UBER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 1.09 vs AMD's 2.30
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +439.7% vs YMM's -21.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs AMD's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs YMM's -21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.0% |
YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
UBER leads 1 • YMM leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 17.8x YMM's $12.1B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $215.9B | $37.5B | $53.7B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $133.2B | $6.6B | $7.0B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.2B | $120.1B | $5.0B | $8.5B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $96.7B | $8.6B | $9.8B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +41.0% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +60.4% | +11.7% | +11.7% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +55.6% | +13.3% | +15.9% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +44.8% | +22.9% | +18.3% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +73.2% | +37.8% | +14.5% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.4% | +97.8% | +90.9% | -84.3% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
UBER leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, UBER trades at a 89% valuation discount to AMD's 154.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs AMD's 29.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.0B | $5.14T | $665.9B | $157.9B | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.2B | $5.14T | $664.9B | $163.7B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.65x | 43.16x | 154.14x | 16.22x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.94x | 25.55x | 59.65x | 22.78x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 29.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.44x | 38.59x | 99.26x | 25.93x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.52x | 23.80x | 19.22x | 3.04x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 32.85x | 10.61x | 5.79x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.70x | 53.17x | 98.88x | 16.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. YMM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YMM scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +76.3% | +8.1% | +32.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +58.1% | +6.5% | +14.2% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +81.8% | +4.7% | +13.6% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +97.2% | +5.7% | +12.5% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.48x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.7B | $807M | -$1.1B | $5.7B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.8B | $10.6B | $5.5B | $7.7B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $11.4B | $4.5B | $13.5B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x | 33.19x | 11.51x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,339 for YMM. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs YMM's -21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs YMM's 16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.1% | +12.0% | +82.8% | -7.4% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.9% | +80.7% | +307.0% | -8.3% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | +625.9% | +329.8% | +97.6% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.6% | +1328.9% | +418.3% | +63.2% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.6% | +23902.3% | +11090.7% | +84.6% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +93.6% | +62.6% | +25.5% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVDA and UBER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs YMM's 63.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.73x | 2.30x | 1.09x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.07 | $216.80 | $430.57 | $101.99 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.04 | $112.28 | $96.88 | $68.46 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.4% | +97.6% | +94.9% | +75.2% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.8 | 60.7 | 81.2 | 62.3 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 164.5M | 36.4M | 15.9M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — YMM and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YMM as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", UBER as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for UBER (target: $105) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77). YMM is the only dividend payer here at 1.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.67 | $278.83 | $310.86 | $104.88 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 79 | 70 | 61 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UBER leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
YMM vs NVDA vs AMD vs UBER vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC?
On trailing P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -56.
6% for Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus YMM's -56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning AMD is approximately 111% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 7% for Uber Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YMM leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 103. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UBER: 36. 7% to $104. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC?
In this comparison, YMM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA, AMD, UBER, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YMM or NVDA or AMD or UBER or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Full Truck Alliance Co.
Ltd. (YMM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YMM: -56. 6%, AMD: +110. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YMM and NVDA and AMD and UBER and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YMM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. YMM pays a dividend while NVDA, AMD, UBER, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.