Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Conglomerates
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Aerospace & Defense
ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense | Conglomerates | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $11.12B | $7.19B | $135.04B | $21.26B | $310.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.40B | $1.93B | $36.76B | $3.03B | $48.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $419M | $118M | $4.10B | $479M | $8.66B |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 24.2% | 36.9% | 29.7% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 9.5% | 14.9% | 21.3% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 41.5x | 20.2x | 40.9x | 39.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.82B | $993M | $34.58B | $738M | $20.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $125M | $71M | $12.49B | $316M | $12.39B |
ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zebra Technologies … (ZBRA) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Hexcel Corporation (HXL) | 100 | 263.4 | +163.4% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
| Carpenter Technolog… (CRS) | 100 | 1830.8 | +1730.8% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 908.4 | +808.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZBRA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 39.3x)
HXL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 79.4%, current ratio 2.26x
HON has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.74 vs ZBRA's 1.84
- 2.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs HXL's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 13.3% 10Y total return vs ZBRA's 261.2%
- PEG 0.19 vs HON's 11.03
- +104.9% vs ZBRA's -14.8%
- 13.6% ROA vs HXL's 4.3%, ROIC 17.5% vs 6.0%
GE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5%
- 17.9% margin vs HXL's 6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 39.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs HXL's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs ZBRA's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs HXL's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.9% vs ZBRA's -14.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs HXL's 4.3%, ROIC 17.5% vs 6.0% |
ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRS leads in 2 of 6 categories
GE leads 1 • ZBRA leads 1 • HON leads 1 • HXL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.4B annually — 25.0x HXL's $1.9B. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HXL's 6.1%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $1.9B | $36.8B | $3.0B | $48.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $968M | $306M | $6.5B | $791M | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $419M | $118M | $4.1B | $479M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $831M | $251M | $4.2B | $407M | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +24.2% | +36.9% | +29.7% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +9.5% | +14.9% | +21.3% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +6.1% | +11.2% | +15.8% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +13.0% | +11.4% | +13.5% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +8.3% | -6.9% | +11.6% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.7% | +40.0% | -41.9% | +47.3% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ZBRA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.6x trailing earnings, ZBRA trades at a 60% valuation discount to HXL's 69.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRS offers better value at 0.26x vs HON's 15.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.1B | $7.2B | $135.0B | $21.3B | $310.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.8B | $8.1B | $157.1B | $21.7B | $318.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.63x | 69.58x | 28.96x | 57.66x | 36.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.68x | 41.47x | 20.24x | 40.91x | 39.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.38x | 15.77x | 0.26x | 3.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.02x | 27.60x | 19.75x | 32.80x | 31.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 3.80x | 3.61x | 7.39x | 6.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.23x | 6.10x | 8.87x | 11.50x | 16.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 23.40x | 25.04x | 74.30x | 42.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $8 for HXL. CRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRS scores 7/9 vs ZBRA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +8.4% | +23.1% | +24.4% | +45.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +4.3% | +5.3% | +13.6% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +6.0% | +12.6% | +17.5% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +7.2% | +12.6% | +17.9% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.79x | 2.24x | 0.39x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $922M | $22.1B | $423M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $125M | $71M | $12.5B | $316M | $12.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $993M | $34.6B | $738M | $20.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.17x | 4.45x | 3.92x | 13.82x | 11.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRS five years ago would be worth $104,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,670 for ZBRA. Over the past 12 months, CRS leads with a +104.9% total return vs ZBRA's -14.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRS at 103.7% vs ZBRA's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +24.5% | +9.4% | +26.6% | -7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.8% | +85.0% | +1.5% | +104.9% | +39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.7% | +33.1% | +14.7% | +745.8% | +273.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.3% | +81.9% | +1.0% | +943.1% | +352.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.2% | +126.9% | +132.4% | +1331.3% | +117.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | +10.0% | +4.7% | +103.7% | +55.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HXL and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZBRA's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HXL currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs ZBRA's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.08x | 0.74x | 1.34x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $352.66 | $98.26 | $248.18 | $475.69 | $348.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $199.05 | $50.54 | $186.76 | $204.47 | $210.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +97.0% | +85.9% | +89.9% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 63.3 | 44.2 | 57.6 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 710K | 1.2M | 3.7M | 695K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
HON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZBRA as "Buy", HXL as "Hold", HON as "Buy", CRS as "Buy", GE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.6% upside for ZBRA (target: $311) vs -5.3% for HXL (target: $90). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs CRS's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $311.00 | $90.25 | $243.83 | $465.80 | $386.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 36 | 28 | 21 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +2.2% | +0.2% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | $4.63 | $0.79 | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +6.3% | +2.8% | +0.5% | +2.4% |
CRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ZBRA vs HXL vs HON vs CRS vs GE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE?
On trailing P/E, Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is the cheapest at 27.
6x versus Hexcel Corporation at 69. 6x. On forward P/E, Zebra Technologies Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Carpenter Technology Corporation wins at 0. 19x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE?
Over the past 5 years, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) delivered a total return of +943.
1%, compared to -53. 3% for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRS returned +1331% versus GE's +117. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Zebra Technologies Corporation's 1. 84β — meaning ZBRA is approximately 148% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carpenter Technology Corporation grew EPS 100. 5% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Zebra Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 5. 8% for Hexcel Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 9. 1% for HXL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBRA leads at 45. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Hexcel Corporation — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZBRA: 37. 6% to $311. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE?
In this comparison, HON (2.
2% yield), HXL (0. 7% yield), GE (0. 5% yield), CRS (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ZBRA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZBRA or HXL or HON or CRS or GE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 2% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +132. 4%, ZBRA: +261. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZBRA and HXL and HON and CRS and GE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZBRA (Technology) and HXL (Industrials) and HON (Industrials) and CRS (Industrials) and GE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZBRA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock. HXL, HON pay a dividend while ZBRA, CRS, GE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.