Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Residential Construction
Entertainment
Entertainment
ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Residential Construction | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $1.64B | $3.21B | $42.29B | $15.27B | $98M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $2.25B | $33.35B | $9.03B | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $41M | $3.17B | $1.69B | $-140M |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 64.6% | 22.8% | 34.9% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 1.5% | 11.8% | 7.8% | -3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.1x | 109.7x | 13.7x | 25.8x | 5.0x |
| Total Debt | $892M | $1.43B | $6.03B | $2.94B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $607M | $960M | $2.99B | $2.40B | — |
ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -19.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- +36.9% vs NWSA's -3.3%
Among these 5 stocks, IAC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 424.3% 10Y total return vs NWSA's 136.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- 1.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs NWSA's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NWSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.60, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.84x
- 18.7% margin vs AMCX's -6.0%
- Beta 0.60 vs ZD's 1.19, lower leverage
AMCX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 25.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs AMCX's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs ZD's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs NWSA's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs NWSA's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 12.1% |
ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMCX leads in 1 of 6 categories
NWSA leads 1 • ZD leads 0 • IAC leads 0 • DHI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZD and NWSA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 23.0x ZD's $1.5B. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $2.2B | $33.3B | $9.0B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $420M | $129M | $4.0B | $469M | $686M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $41M | $3.2B | $1.7B | -$140M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $60M | $3.5B | $572M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +64.6% | +22.8% | +34.9% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +1.5% | +11.8% | +7.8% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +1.8% | +9.5% | +18.7% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +2.7% | +10.5% | +6.3% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | -25.9% | -2.3% | +8.9% | -6.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.3% | +64.8% | -13.2% | +6.1% | -10.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, DHI trades at a 67% valuation discount to ZD's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $3.2B | $42.3B | $15.3B | $98M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $3.7B | $45.3B | $15.8B | $98M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.66x | -32.42x | 12.62x | 13.06x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.10x | 109.69x | 13.71x | 25.75x | 5.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.01x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.45x | 14.30x | 10.02x | 11.17x | 0.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 1.34x | 1.23x | 1.81x | 0.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 0.70x | 1.83x | 1.64x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.69x | 71.54x | 12.88x | 21.00x | 0.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. DHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZD's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWSA scores 7/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.6% | +0.9% | +12.9% | +18.1% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.6% | +8.9% | +10.9% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | -1.2% | +12.1% | +6.8% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | -1.3% | +13.1% | +7.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.30x | 0.24x | 0.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $285M | $466M | $3.0B | $537M | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $607M | $960M | $3.0B | $2.4B | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $892M | $1.4B | $6.0B | $2.9B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 4.84x | 44.09x | 127.43x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ZD and DHI and NWSA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DHI five years ago would be worth $14,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,813 for AMCX. Over the past 12 months, ZD leads with a +36.9% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWSA at 17.3% vs AMCX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | +10.5% | +0.8% | +3.6% | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.9% | +22.1% | +20.3% | -3.3% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.9% | -2.9% | +38.6% | +61.3% | -44.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.2% | -67.3% | +46.7% | +2.2% | -81.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.7% | +347.8% | +424.3% | +136.5% | -87.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | -1.0% | +11.5% | +17.3% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IAC and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZD's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs DHI's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 1.10x | 0.85x | 0.60x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.55 | $45.78 | $184.55 | $31.61 | $10.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.45 | $29.56 | $114.17 | $22.20 | $5.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +94.2% | +79.1% | +85.5% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 48.1 | 49.6 | 58.3 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.1M | 2.6M | 4.1M | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DHI and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZD as "Buy", IAC as "Buy", DHI as "Hold", NWSA as "Buy", AMCX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs DHI's 1.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $49.17 | $163.86 | $32.40 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 33 | 52 | 28 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.60 | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.6% | +9.8% | +10.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
AMCX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NWSA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
ZD vs IAC vs DHI vs NWSA vs AMCX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ziff Davis, Inc.
(ZD) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX?
On trailing P/E, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus Ziff Davis, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX?
Over the past 5 years, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -81. 9% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DHI returned +424. 3% versus AMCX's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), News Corporation (NWSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus Ziff Davis, Inc. 's 1. 19β — meaning ZD is approximately 99% more volatile than NWSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 51% for Ziff Davis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ziff Davis, Inc.
(ZD) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for D. R. Horton, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZD leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZD leads at 14. 1% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 104. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 19. 8% to $32. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX?
In this comparison, NWSA (1.
2% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ZD, IAC, AMCX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZD or IAC or DHI or NWSA or AMCX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, ZD: -13. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZD and IAC and DHI and NWSA and AMCX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZD (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical) and NWSA (Communication Services) and AMCX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DHI, NWSA pay a dividend while ZD, IAC, AMCX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.