Specialty Business Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $9M | $1.18B | $1.98B | $337M | $1M | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $13.53B | $17.63B | $14.01B | $360M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $799K | $2.54B | $5.97B | $1.61B | $-51M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 77.0% | 78.6% | 74.4% | 35.5% | 100.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 21.5% | 39.1% | 14.4% | 54.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.6x | 0.5x | 0.4x | 4.3x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $7K | $1.32B | $3.82B | $4.80B | $4.22B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $327K | $6.20B | $4.70B | $3.88B | $338M | $10.27B |
ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 258.0 | +158.0% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 142.0 | +42.0% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| CNFinance Holdings … (CNF) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 135.2% revenue growth vs CNF's -60.9%
- 39.4% margin vs CNF's -14.0%
- 35.7% ROA vs CNF's -0.4%, ROIC 99.7% vs -0.6%
FINV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 73.69x
- Beta 1.11, yield 6.1%, current ratio 73.69x
QFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 19.7%
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 104.2%
- NIM 14.6% vs CNF's 0.6%
- 19.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
LX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.02 vs KO's 2.17
- Lower P/E (0.4x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.02 vs 2.17
CNF is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.39 vs ZGM's 1.78
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 115.0% 10Y total return vs QFIN's 28.2%
- +17.7% vs LX's -66.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 135.2% revenue growth vs CNF's -60.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.02 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.4% margin vs CNF's -14.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs ZGM's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 19.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs LX's -66.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 35.7% ROA vs CNF's -0.4%, ROIC 99.7% vs -0.6% |
ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNF leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • ZGM leads 1 • FINV leads 0 • QFIN leads 0 • LX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNF leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 24291.2x ZGM's $2M. ZGM is the more profitable business, keeping 39.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNF's -14.0%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $13.5B | $17.6B | $14.0B | $360M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $3.0B | $7.2B | $1.8B | $198M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2.5B | $6.0B | $1.6B | -$51M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $1.4B | $7.9B | $0 | $0 | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.0% | +78.6% | +74.4% | +35.5% | +100.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +21.5% | +39.1% | +14.4% | +54.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +39.4% | +18.8% | +33.9% | +11.5% | -14.0% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.8% | +10.3% | +45.0% | +25.5% | +12.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -38.5% | +14.5% | +110.3% | -8.5% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CNF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.2x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 95% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.04x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $1.2B | $2.0B | $337M | $1M | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $455M | $1.9B | $473M | $575M | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 3.38x | 1.20x | 1.48x | -0.02x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.56x | 0.54x | 0.40x | 4.35x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.47x | 0.04x | 0.06x | — | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.30x | 1.02x | 1.74x | 1.35x | — | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.21x | 0.60x | 0.72x | 0.18x | 0.01x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.50x | 0.29x | 0.20x | 0.00x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.48x | 1.23x | 0.70x | 0.09x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZGM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZGM delivers a 71.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $72 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CNF. ZGM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 7/9 vs FINV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +71.7% | +6.0% | +25.0% | +14.7% | -1.2% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +35.7% | +3.9% | +10.2% | +7.2% | -0.4% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +99.7% | +12.8% | +17.7% | +10.4% | -0.6% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +87.6% | +13.0% | +20.4% | +13.9% | -0.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.08x | 0.16x | 0.40x | 1.18x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$320,221 | -$4.9B | -$873M | $919M | $3.9B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $327,111 | $6.2B | $4.7B | $3.9B | $338M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6,890 | $1.3B | $3.8B | $4.8B | $4.2B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 153.26x | -0.14x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,020 for CNF. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.7% total return vs LX's -66.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 11.7% vs CNF's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.7% | -4.7% | -12.0% | -32.5% | -48.5% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.5% | -47.7% | -59.3% | -66.3% | -45.7% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | +20.9% | +27.1% | +18.9% | -89.6% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | -40.3% | -51.0% | -78.5% | -89.8% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | -50.8% | +28.2% | -74.3% | -95.9% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.8% | +6.5% | +8.3% | +5.9% | -52.9% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZGM's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs LX's 25.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.11x | 1.17x | 1.25x | 0.39x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.51 | $10.90 | $46.18 | $7.99 | $8.80 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $4.35 | $11.64 | $1.79 | $2.36 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.8% | +42.8% | +32.9% | +25.0% | +35.1% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.6 | 43.8 | 54.1 | 42.3 | 49.3 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 960K | 1.4M | 1.6M | 6K | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QFIN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FINV as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", LX as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.0% upside for LX (target: $4) vs 0.8% for QFIN (target: $15). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 19.69% vs KO's 2.56%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.94 | $15.33 | $3.50 | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 4 | 12 | — | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.1% | +19.7% | +16.0% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 5 | 3 | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.91 | $20.25 | $2.16 | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.6% | +36.2% | +8.9% | +24.7% | +0.2% |
CNF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ZGM vs FINV vs QFIN vs LX vs CNF vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares (ZGM) is the stronger pick with 135.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FinVolution Group (FINV) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 02x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to -89. 8% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +115. 0% versus CNF's -95. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 78β — meaning ZGM is approximately -862% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares (ZGM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares (ZGM) is pulling ahead at 135.
2% versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -122. 3% for CNFinance Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO?
Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares (ZGM) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
4% net margin versus -73. 1% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZGM leads at 48. 2% versus -11. 2% for CNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNF leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) trades at 0. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 23. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LX: 75. 0% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO?
In this comparison, QFIN (19.
7% yield), LX (16. 0% yield), FINV (6. 1% yield), KO (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ZGM, CNF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZGM or FINV or QFIN or LX or CNF or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares (ZGM) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ZGM: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZGM and FINV and QFIN and LX and CNF and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZGM (Industrials) and FINV (Financial Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and LX (Financial Services) and CNF (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZGM is a small-cap high-growth stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FINV, QFIN, LX, KO pay a dividend while ZGM, CNF do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.