Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$6.85B
5Y Perf.+6.1%
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17.56B
5Y Perf.+54.4%
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.-52.0%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.55T
5Y Perf.+141.6%

ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZK logoZK
RIVN logoRIVN
LCID logoLCID
TSLA logoTSLA
IndustryAuto - ManufacturersAuto - ManufacturersAuto - ManufacturersAuto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$6.85B$17.56B$2.00B$1.55T
Revenue (TTM)$90.59B$5.53B$1.12B$97.88B
Net Income (TTM)$-3.33B$-3.52B$-3.36B$3.88B
Gross Margin18.9%-1.7%-145.0%19.1%
Operating Margin-4.0%-68.9%-339.6%5.0%
Forward P/E2.3x213.0x
Total Debt$15.60B$6.65B$861M$8.38B
Cash & Equiv.$7.78B$3.58B$998M$16.51B

ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZK
RIVN
LCID
TSLA
StockMay 24Dec 25Return
ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK)100106.1+6.1%
Rivian Automotive, … (RIVN)100154.4+54.4%
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID)10048.0-52.0%
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)100241.6+141.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TSLA leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. LCID also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
The Income Pick

ZK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
  • Rev growth 46.9%, EPS growth 34.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 126.6%
  • Lower P/E (2.3x vs 213.0x)
  • Beta 0.47 vs TSLA's 2.06
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

RIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.59, current ratio 2.33x
  • Beta 1.59, current ratio 2.33x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
The Growth Leader

LCID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 67.6% revenue growth vs TSLA's -2.9%
Best for: growth
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TSLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 28.6% 10Y total return vs ZK's -5.4%
  • 4.0% margin vs LCID's -300.4%
  • +49.1% vs LCID's -73.1%
  • 2.9% ROA vs LCID's -40.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs -98.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLCID logoLCID67.6% revenue growth vs TSLA's -2.9%
ValueZK logoZKLower P/E (2.3x vs 213.0x)
Quality / MarginsTSLA logoTSLA4.0% margin vs LCID's -300.4%
Stability / SafetyZK logoZKBeta 0.47 vs TSLA's 2.06
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TSLA logoTSLA+49.1% vs LCID's -73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)TSLA logoTSLA2.9% ROA vs LCID's -40.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs -98.7%

ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZKZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
FY 2024
Vehicle Sales
100.0%$55.3B
RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive
71.1%$3.8B
Software And Services
28.9%$1.6B
LCIDLucid Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Regulatory Credits
100.0%$96M
TSLATesla, Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive
73.3%$69.5B
Energy Generation And Storage Segment
13.5%$12.8B
Services And Other
13.2%$12.5B

ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTSLALAGGINGLCID

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.9B annually — 87.5x LCID's $1.1B. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LCID's -3.0%. On growth, ZK holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZK logoZKZEEKR Intelligent…RIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$90.6B$5.5B$1.1B$97.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2.7B-$3.2B-$3.6B$9.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3.3B-$3.5B-$3.4B$3.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$2.5B-$4.7B$7.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.9%-1.7%-145.0%+19.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%-68.9%-3.4%+5.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.7%-63.6%-3.0%+4.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.0%-45.0%-4.2%+7.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+11.4%-100.0%+15.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+83.8%+31.3%-44.2%+11.9%
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricZK logoZKZEEKR Intelligent…RIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$6.8B$17.6B$2.0B$1.55T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.7B$20.6B$1.9B$1.54T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.98x-4.62x-0.50x381.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.29x212.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate9.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple146.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.09x3.26x1.48x16.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.66x2.64x17.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.61x248.44x
ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-193 for LCID. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RIVN's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs LCID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZK logoZKZEEKR Intelligent…RIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-69.6%-193.0%+4.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.4%-23.5%-40.0%+2.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.7%-98.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-29.5%-49.2%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95436
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.45x1.20x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7.8B$3.1B-$137M-$8.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.8B$3.6B$998M$16.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15.6B$6.7B$861M$8.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.40x-27.31x-146.67x17.04x
TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TSLA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $314 for LCID. Over the past 12 months, TSLA leads with a +49.1% total return vs LCID's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 33.8% vs LCID's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZK logoZKZEEKR Intelligent…RIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.9%-45.7%-6.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+6.1%+11.6%-73.1%+49.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.4%+2.3%-92.2%+139.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.4%-85.9%-96.9%+83.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.4%-85.9%-93.9%+2856.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.8%+0.8%-57.2%+33.8%
TSLA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ZK is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZK currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs LCID's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZK logoZKZEEKR Intelligent…RIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.47x1.59x2.03x2.06x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.71$22.69$33.70$498.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.58$11.57$5.62$271.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.3%+62.5%+18.0%+82.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.038.134.459.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded026.7M12.9M61.6M
ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZK as "Buy", RIVN as "Buy", LCID as "Hold", TSLA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 9.4% for TSLA (target: $450).

MetricZK logoZKZEEKR Intelligent…RIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.25$18.36$14.00$450.45
# AnalystsCovering analysts2281581
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallTesla, Inc. (TSLA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZK vs RIVN vs LCID vs TSLA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) offers the better valuation at 381. 3x trailing P/E (213. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA?

On forward P/E, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA?

Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.

(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -96. 9% for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus LCID's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

47β versus Tesla, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSLA is approximately 341% more volatile than ZK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 145% for Rivian Automotive, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -2. 9% for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Tesla, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZK leads at 126. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA?

Tesla, Inc.

(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -199. 3% for Lucid Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4. 6% versus -258. 7% for LCID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLA leads at 18. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) trades at 2.

3x forward P/E versus 213. 0x for Tesla, Inc. — 210. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 131. 4% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ZK or RIVN or LCID or TSLA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

47)). Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZK: -5. 4%, LCID: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZK and RIVN and LCID and TSLA?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ZK is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ZK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LCID

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TSLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZK and RIVN and LCID and TSLA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZK: 36.4% · RIVN: 11.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.